this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
135 points (98.6% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5383 readers
400 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
135
I’ve studied geopolitics all my life: climate breakdown is a bigger threat than China and Russia (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 3 months ago by piefedderatedd@piefed.social to c/climate@slrpnk.net
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

‘Risk’ analyses largely ignore the dangers of the climate crisis. Unless we wake up to them, they will soon outweigh all others

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 2 months ago

We can it climate change because all we know is that the balance of the Holocene is over

It will be less hospitable to humanity because we've long lived in ideal conditions. Will it benefit Canada and Russia? I'd argue "no", because the polar vortex is no joke. Stable climate is good, unpredictable climate is bad