468
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by 101@feddit.org to c/whitepeopletwitter@sh.itjust.works

Taylor & Francis and Wiley sold out their researchers in bulk, this should be a crime.

Researchers need to be able to consent or refuse to consent and science need to be respected more than that.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Grimy@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago

It's for reasons like these that I think its foolhardy to be advocating for a strengthening of copyrights when it comes to AI.

The windfall will not be shared, the data is already out of the hands of the individuals and any "pro-artist" law will only help kill the competition for companies like Google, Sony Music, Disney and Microsoft.

These companies will happily pay huge sums to lock anyone out of the scene. They are already splitting it between each other, they are anticipating a green light for regulatory capture.

[-] hemko@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 weeks ago

Copyright is not supposed to be protecting individuals work from corporations, but the otherway around

this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
468 points (97.2% liked)

People Twitter

5084 readers
708 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying.
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS