this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
21 points (92.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

807 readers
66 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I know this question will sound silly to some, but suppose a group of people in a low key third world country decide to make their own commune. They work together to build up farming and industry purely based on their own need, and slowly expand to accomodate their needs.

I understand Communes are viewed as ineffective, but a commune like this would be meant to grow, not just remain isolated. It would inspire communes in other areas, and it would aim to expand.

I see a couple of issues with this:

  • not all countries can do this. For example, Palestinians living in Palestine will suffer trying to do this. But most countries can, right?
  • it will only benefit the tiny group of people within proximity to the commune. But the commune can 1) expand and 2) inspire communes in other locations
  • some needs are hard for a small commune to make, such as computer chip manufacturing, and other things they will need to get from the non commune world

But still, I can't see this as less than a good step forward?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] GreatSquare@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Why is trade necessary? Is it because the commune would not be able to produce everything it needs and wants?

Correct. It's wants would exceed what it can produce. It can trade the excess of what it produces for other goods and services.

What if it can cover all needs and good enough portion of the wants?

Self sufficiency is difficult at a commune level. Just access to healthcare is a need.

We can see this already in real world. Don't even worry about the commune aspect. A less developed country has lower access to healthcare, education, etc. To develop they have to have something valuable to trade.