this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2024
298 points (96.9% liked)

Asklemmy

43889 readers
804 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] flubba86@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Everyone replying seems to be confusing "timeline" with "generation" or "era", discussing how this point in time is better than other times in history. That is not what OP was asking.

[โ€“] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We live in a timeline where the niceties of this generation or era were possible and came to be. Seems like a pretty decent timeline to me.

[โ€“] flubba86@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Yeah, that's how I'm choosing to interpret them.

[โ€“] orcrist@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

That's true but I think irrelevant. People are posting examples of things that used to be bad and have improved. If you want your science fiction framing, just consider the timeline where those things didn't improve, and you have your answer.

Because so many of us didn't interpret the question properly at first, maybe the question could have been written more clearly, and it wasn't and that's okay, but I hope people looking for answers would be willing to do a little bit of logical reasoning.

[โ€“] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It demonstrates how things could be worse, but aren't.

[โ€“] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's basically look at all these improvements that happen in the last n years. This is obviously better than a timeline where those changes didn't happen.

[โ€“] milicent_bystandr@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

It also gives context for what way things could be worse. Compared to a completely dissociated suggestion like, "the entire universe didn't spontaneously turn into farts therefore this isn't the worst timeline."