982
'Omg': Critics stunned as Trump caught 'endorsing The Purge' as a real policy at his rally
(www.rawstory.com)
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
982 points (97.2% liked)
News
23376 readers
2133 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I am not trying to silence anyone. People are free to do what they want. I stand by my position that voting for anyone but Trump or Harris achieves nothing.
Voting third party in modern history has never achieved anything and there is no one anywhere close to the popularity of Ross Perot, who came closest.
Telling people that if they don't vote with you they shouldn't vote at all is pretty telling of who you are and what you want. You said it above and you barely have changed your stance to hide your disdain.
And now you saying people can only other vote for Trump since he's the other representative of a deeply problematic 2 party system?
If people want to voice their displeasure but not necessarily achieve something, I'm not yelling at people that they are worth less than nothing when they do it. And I definitely don't want to push the idea that Republicans have to only vote Trump because it's his party.
People can vote for whomever they like.
I have no idea why you think I have the power to stop them, but I do not have that ability.
I also do not have the ability to yell at anyone over Lemmy.
You are being ridiculous.
Just because you put on a veneer of post indifference doesn't make reality any different.
You can vote for whoever you want. That doesn't mean you don't get to face the very clear negative consequences for how you vote.
If you want to make the choice to not vote for the only candidate that can beat Trump, that's your call. But dont for a second think you're immune from criticism for not wanting to help beat him.
Yeah, that's how the world works. I don't think people who don't vote in line with the Democratic Party care about not being in the same good graces to be considered one of them.
But pushing the false equivalence that somehow not voting for Trump is the same as directly voting for him is foolish and not a good tactic to swing them into voting with the party.
These are anti authoritarian people. As in literally don't like being told what to do. And you can't fix a negative with a negative. People need to feel inspired themselves to do the right things. Otherwise people are shockingly self destructive and will cut off their nose to spite the fact.
You are free to bully people that will say they voting a way you don't like too but don't think it will be productive is my point.
I did not say that, nor would I agree with that statement. 3rd party/non voters ARE supporting Trump. They are not providing as much support as someone who actively votes for him, but because of the way FPTP voting works, their actions absolutely benefit the GOP more than the Democratic Party.
I haven't told anyone what to do. I've explained the results of not voting/3rd party voting, that's all. If they don't like those results it sure sounds like they shouldn't do the dumb shit they're proposing.
"By doing X, you are causing Y" is not bullying. That's absurd.
Alright last comment cause I got stuff to do. But you literally just said you don't agree that not voting for Trump is the same then said it's practically the same. In literally the next sentence.
Just because someone isn't voting for your desired candidate or your opposition doesn't mean they are supporting the one you have issue with. It literally doesn't work that way. They might not be helping you but somehow it only impacts one side? Cause there isn't a net positive for it anymore? That doesn't equal a positive for the other just literally a neutral "wasted" vote because sure it is.
If you can drive a car and not support climate change than this can be true as well. Attaching a moral equivalence to measure people against for a desired outcome is just you telling people they don't matter and are "other" for not being with you. You aren't say8ng what will happen cause if someone votes third party... They vote third party. That's it. You just don't like it so you push that it equates to something you see as worse.
Pushing fake math to appease your own mind is not exactly great. And you can lament them not helping but saying they are doing something you view as immoral because you view it a negative as a positive for the enemy is creating a wedge that doesn't need to exist.
Not going to continue this if you insist on this bad faith bullshit. Have a nice day!
Blue MAGA out here going strong
Weak ass bullshitters want to piss in everyone's Cheerios to make themselves feel better. Can't even engage without intentionally misstating me.
Okay? That doesn't change the fact that I can't force anyone to vote for anyone or not vote or do anything and I don't have the ability to yell at someone on Lemmy.
Also, for someone who complains about people being silenced, you sure want me to shut up.
"Hey that sure sounds like unproductive bullying"
OK cool whatever. But you are totally being reasonable and pedantic now so nothing you have done or said before matters. Got it.
I said nothing about bullying, nor did I try to bully anyone. Why are you lying?
You acted like the victim by saying I wanted you to shut up when that wasn't said by me and now are doubling down on the victim for being told something you don't like. I really don't care.
You say the most bizarre and untrue things.
By quoting you?
Are you a troll or that sheltered that you are able to alter every interaction in your head to make yourself the only good person?
Some would call that narcissistic behaviour or borderline personality disorder.
I mean... you sure seemed like you didn't want me talking about what I was talking about, but maybe I was wrong about that.
Of course, what with my narcissistic behavior and/or borderline personality disorder, admitting I'm wrong about something is impossible, so now I'm confused.
And still playing the victim while ignoring that none of what happens in your head is what is happening in real life and I have participated in the conversation the whole time.
I think you are wrong to talk the way you do. And assume things that are self affirming than being honest with reality.
You literally are still using sarcasm and avoidance as a shield and haven't met the conversation once but used the feeling of being right to be your moral compass.
Yeah I would still call you a narcissist.
I honestly have no idea what you're talking about, but you sure do like insults.
No you just like to say stuff and don't listen to others. So yes I'm sure these all sound like insults.
Oh to have your free time and ignorance.
If I'm ignorant, shouldn't you want to educate me rather than berate me? Is this how you think ignorance should be dealt with?
Oh cool, if you want to be educated, well then reread this conversation from the beginning where I try to have the conversation you refuse to have. Then when you get to here and haven't changed start over and reread the conversation from the beginning. And when you get to here and pretend to care again start from the beginning where I tried to have this conversation.
Okay, well at the beginning, you accused me of silencing people and yelling and both of those were lies, so I'm not sure where you want me to go from there.