this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
1224 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

11414 readers
2175 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] OpenStars@discuss.online 72 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh how right/wrong they were... ๐Ÿ˜ฎ

[โ€“] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 106 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

At that level of co2 production, they were probably right about the timetable. What they couldn't predict is that co2 production would rise so dramatically with automobiles and industry in the decades after that. They were at 7 billion tons a year then. We are over 36 billion tons a year now, over 5 times as much. That has clearly expedited the effects on the climate.

[โ€“] OpenStars@discuss.online 29 points 2 months ago

That's so cool to know! Oh wait I mean hot, and also not, well anyway thanks for sharing:-P.

[โ€“] EddyBot@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 months ago

What they couldn't predict is that co2 production would rise so dramatically

interestingly enough in the early 1900 there were more electric cars than ICEs in north america