this post was submitted on 06 Jan 2025
58 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

44280 readers
445 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Soulifix@kbin.melroy.org 9 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Anytime I enter one with a purist/gatekeeper. You just can't reason with them and they absolutely refuse to see the other side of the argument. They must always believe that their direction is the direction for all things regarding X fandoms or general hobby.

[โ€“] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Or people who are pedantic.

"The sky is blue."

"No it isn't! It is red at sunrise and at sundown."

"Ok comic book guy."

[โ€“] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

Whether 12:00:00 is a period of time and could be AM or PM, or whether it was a point in time i.e., the meridian, and was neither AM nor PM.

[โ€“] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 days ago

12:00:00 exists in both AM and PM. I have my lunch at 12 PM.

[โ€“] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I feel like there's not much to fight about. I can understand the latter perspective, but from a practical point of view it just makes sense to consistently assign it to AM/PM rather than creating an unnecessary edge case (lord knows there are enough of those with date/time systems). Also this is all made moot by the superior system: the 24-hour clock (now THERE'S something I bet you could have a good argument about!).

[โ€“] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Indeed, the minute (sorry) difference is what made the argument so dumb. In the end it came down to the implementation of the systems we were working withm which wereโ€ฆ not good. My favourite thing about 24-hour time is to be able to use 00:00 and 24:00. And the worst thing is notation in systems only going up to 23:59:59.

[โ€“] xilliah@beehaw.org 7 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That the whole transgender thing is a conspiracy by the healthcare sector to earn more money.

load more comments (2 replies)

ugh. gotta be the one about jesus preaching pacifism. The person said the turn the other cheek was not to be taken literally but a thing he says after he admonishes a disciple for cuting off a soldiers ear and healing the ear but then he says his fight is yet to come and he will need to be armed and armored for it. that he feels is literal and not prose at all. smh.

[โ€“] vk6flab@lemmy.radio 11 points 4 days ago (3 children)
[โ€“] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Whether the saying is โ€œif they think that, then theyโ€™ve got another think comingโ€ or โ€œif they think that, then theyโ€™ve got another thing comingโ€.

After a cursory search it seems like both are acceptable. "Think" appears to be the original phrase, but "thing" is more common today, especially in America.

[โ€“] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

That one always gets me. The phrase means that the person is wrong about something, and circumstances will compel them to reconsider their position or opinion. The word "think" refers to a cognitive process, such as reconsidering their position or opinion. As for the alternative, what's the "thing" that's coming? Their latest Amazon order is out for delivery?

[โ€“] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[โ€“] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's what I've always figured, since the implied threat of violence/retribution seems like a very American attitude.

[โ€“] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

What? No, just via circumstances. As in, the situation will have consequences you failed to predict.

[โ€“] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I feel that "another thing coming" has mobster vibes, and a comeuppance is a deserved punishment.

Okay, well, it doesn't.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] AernaLingus@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago

I can't remember the specifics (both because it was dumb and because it's so embarrassing I think my brain is trying to protect me), but from what I recall I got into a heated argument on the internet with someone because I felt that fans weren't cheering hard enough for a band I liked at a concert.

...yeah, I know. I'm grateful, though, because it was so colossally stupid and pointless that I had a come-to-Jesus moment and swore off internet arguments entirely. I can only imagine the countless hours of my life it's saved me in the intervening years.

[โ€“] ace_garp@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So dumb.

Hour argument, that the final cliff fall scene in Predator 1 was two different jumps in the 2 cuts.

Can see in the first one he is rotating. Second cut is a straight plumb drop into the water.

How were the rotational moments counteracted?

They weren't, it's two different jumps/takes.

2 friends came up with some hair-brained arguments that you could stop rotating on the way down. (๋ˆˆ_๋ˆˆ)

The only way would be air resistance, and hands/arms is not going to be enough to create drag to counter the rotation.

[โ€“] JackbyDev@programming.dev 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I hate when people get into minute arguments about what is visually happening on screen versus the story that's being told. It can be a single jump narratively but two jumps in production. (I've never seen the movie.)

[โ€“] ace_garp@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

I was not invested in the outcome of the argument, just seeing how far they were willing to take being wrong about aerodynamics/physics. Quite far it turns out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[โ€“] spongebue@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Kinda related, I studied in Spain for a semester. Was taking with my fellow American roommate about the debate of if a tomato is a fruit or vegetable. Our host mom's daughter's boyfriend (Cuban, fwiw) overheard, and we told him about the "controversy" in the US but all 3 of us agreed it was a fruit. Host mom overheard us and asked what we were talking about, and the Cuban told her. "Well yeah, of course it's a vegetable"

I couldn't understand every word but when I could tell they were arguing about some vegetables having seeds or something like that I knew I spread something.

[โ€“] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

All fruits are vegetables, not all vegetables are fruits. All edible plant matter is vegetable. Fruits are, well, the fruit of a plant.

[โ€“] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Fruits are the reproductive organs of plants designed to be eaten by other animals in order to spread their seeds.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ