this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2025
79 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19296 readers
2043 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HK65@sopuli.xyz 7 points 9 hours ago

So after drugs won the war on drugs, it seems terror won the war on terror.

[–] not_that_guy05@lemmy.world 44 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Afghanistan is calling.

Welcome all American ISIS. You became the thing you were fighting lol.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 18 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

They always were like this. If you shuffle a bit of their doctrine like diet/day of worship/what they choose to call the same god they all worship, etc.

But they are both conservatives following a branch of Abrahamic religion. They both despise secularism, science, gays, women...

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 10 hours ago

Yep. ISIS just had the wrong operating system. Religious fundamentalism is cross-platform.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 8 points 10 hours ago

Might as well call themselves Gilead too.

[–] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 31 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Congratulations, America, you became Iran.

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 17 points 13 hours ago (1 children)
[–] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

Hey man, I'm hating it with you. I always hated our leadership but still loved our country, but now I just overall hate everything about us. Our fellow traitorous countrymen fucked our futures.

Yeah. I’ve kinda lost all remaining faith I had in the American electorate.

We’ll see how the brain drain pans out in the next few years I guess, depending on how much of a shitshow this place turns into. Who knows - maybe we’ll get the New England Union, Republic of Pacifica, and the Great Lakes Federation out of this idiocy.

The flyover states + Bible Belt are free to enjoy their theocracy, but I don’t want any of that shit. Enjoy having all these dogma and none of the economy, I guess.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 17 points 13 hours ago

I wonder how many of these geniuses have actually read the Constitution or "the" bible.

[–] glowie@h4x0r.host 12 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Reads like a nothing burger. So confirms 20 people in a barn. Loosely tries to connect Tucker Carlson, Elon Musk, and Trump to this movement. This just sounds like fear porn for a fringe minority of radical evangelicals, no different from other radical sects in other religious groups.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

At this point, tens of millions of believers—about 40 percent of American Christians, including Catholics, according to a recent Denison University survey—are embracing an alluring, charismatic movement that has little use for religious pluralism, individual rights, or constitutional democracy.

Doesn't sound very fringe to me.

[–] glowie@h4x0r.host 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

A lot of “surveys” are hardly vetted and they are used in an attempt to extrapolate across a larger group, but are seldom right. Just look at all the early polling that showed Kamala would be leading the Presidency, but we got orange man instead. The article also doesn’t link to said survey, so we can’t even compare its sample size or any other statistical analysis. Maybe they only surveyed 30 people. We just have to use an incredibly large figure injected by the author that supports the article’s claims. For all we know, the results of the survey might even have not been interpreted the way the author has interpreted them. I tried searching for this survey, but came up short in Kagi. Would love to read the survey and find out how it was conducted and whether or not it really does represent the American Christian community at large.

[–] FolknForage@lemm.ee 7 points 13 hours ago
[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Fuck Christianity. Fuck being a secular state.

Religion is a poison to society.

[–] Whiskey_iicarus@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (2 children)

I think you mean non secular state, secular means without respect to religion.

Edit: or are you saying the state should not be neutral to religion (definition of secular), but dismiss it entirely?

[–] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I am saying that being a state tolerant of religion is clearly not working. An atheistic state would be more just to residents.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 10 hours ago

What you're describing is the Laicité that is a cornerstone of French politics and promotes state institutions free "from" religion, not just freedom "of" religion.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 12 hours ago

An atheistic society would also be secular. Unless it turns out that I don't know what that word means...

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I think they are trying to bring up the paradox of tolerance, but dont quote me on that.

[–] Sanctus@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

That was thoroughly sickening. They just might achieve their goals. Never thought I'd be rooting for an establishment being possible to change, but fuck.

[–] SoftTeeth@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 12 hours ago

In 2016, Sheets began embracing prophecies that God was using Trump, telling fellow prophets and apostles that his victory would bring “new levels of demonic desperation.”

Well, he was kind of right about that part. He just got it backwards.