58

In a recent interview, Todd Howard explains how planet exploration in Starfield would have been a lot more punishing before the team decided to nerf "the hell out of it".

...

"So the way the environmental damage works in the game, on planets, and your suit, you have resistances to certain types of atmosphere effects, whether that's radiation or thermal, etc., and that was a pretty complex system - actually, it was very punitive," Howard said on the podcast. "... And what we did at the end of the day, and it was a complicated system for players to understand, is we just nerfed the hell out of it. It matters only a little bit. It matters more in flavor. The affliction you get is more annoying knowing you have it."

...

Howard's comment that Bethesda may address it "going forward" implies Starfield may receive a Hardcore or Survival mode-type difficulty level in the game. It would not be the first time Bethesda added a difficulty mode to one of its games post-release, as Fallout 4 received a Survival Mode a few months after launch. This added a set of features not found in the other difficulty levels, such as eliminating the option to autosave or save manually from the pause menu or stronger enemies spawning more frequently. Should such a mode be added to Starfield, the team could bring back the more punitive system for planet exploration.

all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Veraxus@kbin.social 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can't believe how this guy just keeps opening his mouth and telling us how Starfield used to be fun and interesting, but that they removed all that stuff until all that was left was this sterile Far Cry clone that feels more like a chore than a game.

I'm already mad at how unbearably boring the game is, and the more Todd Howard talks about the development, the more angry I get. It's callously just rubbing salt in an open wound.

[-] Zehzin@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Well, the last thing I need is less incentive to "explore" most of these planets.

[-] HarkMahlberg@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Can't help but feel like that was a missed opportunity. Exploration being risky could lead the player to make meaningful choices with meaningful consequences. It certainly seemed to have that effect in Dark Souls (yes I just invoked Dark Souls please don't dogpile me).

[-] remus989@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Everything about this game feels like a missed opportunity.

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago

I'm all for hardcore as long as you can figure out what the affliction is and how to avoid/cure it.

[-] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

"It was good on my machine."

[-] toxicbubble@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

subnautica is still the best planet exploration game I've played. piloting the sub into the depths feels more like space travel than actual space games

[-] geosoco@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

top notch exploration, and the story was just the right amount.

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
58 points (95.3% liked)

Games

16645 readers
651 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS