this post was submitted on 14 Jan 2025
808 points (99.0% liked)

Funny

7305 readers
2330 users here now

General rules:

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JustinTheGM@ttrpg.network 300 points 1 week ago (4 children)

For those wondering, this played out well! OP found someone to take the job. His wife bit on the prank gleefully, was actually thrilled by the idea that OP had a son he didn't know about. When the prank was revealed, she thought it was hilarious. Ultimately pretty wholesome, OP married a keeper.

[–] SayJess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 230 points 1 week ago (5 children)

We fired our fact-checkers, so we cannot verify whether that is true or not.

[–] talentedkiwi@sh.itjust.works 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

True or not, this is the outcome we deserve.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 20 points 1 week ago

It's the outcome I want to believe as well.

[–] affiliate@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

i would like to post a community note saying that i personally believe it to be true

[–] loudWaterEnjoyer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I can assure you it is true as I was there. I was the $100 note.

[–] eltoukan@jlai.lu 3 points 1 week ago

I can also assure you it is true. I was given a $100 not.. uh wait no you didn't hear that

[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Literally everything about it's anecdotal so the best result a fact-checker could have is a shrug.

Nah they have actual footage from the event

[–] lath@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

The AI replacement says this is true.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They couldn't before they fired them either, so not a lot has changed. Their "fact checkers" were poorly written algorithms that frequently flagged benign content as misinformation.

Their "fact checkers" were poorly written algorithms that frequently flagged benign content as misinformation.

I think the goal was to flag benign content as misinformation to push truthful content to the same level as flat earth content.

So doing exactly what was intended.

[–] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 76 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 week ago

Look at mister MVP over here.

[–] big_slap@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

ahahahaha, thanks for linking

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

He's playing checkers, she's playing 3d go.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I think 3d go is called gone

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dogsnest@lemmy.world 52 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

$500 minimum, and I'd really have to think hard about it.
$1000, done deal.

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 46 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Even at $100 it's a pretty reasonable time/compensation ratio, assuming you only have to spend like 10 minutes on actual performance time.

Of course there is potentially travel time and the overhead of communicating ahead of time to set up the prank.

May not be worth it if you have a full time job already.

[–] driving_crooner 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Any acting student would take the 100 gladly.

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Any ~~acting~~ student would take the 100 gladly.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

> Any ~~acting~~ student would ~~take~~ the 100 ~~gladly~~.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

any ~~acting~~ ~~stu~~Dent would take ~~100~~ his towel

[–] Yeller_king@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago

It's reasonable for a steady gig but not for a one-off contract.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago

Eh I'd even take the gig for an entire evening

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Sorry, someone else already has the job. Thanks for your application though!

[–] BradleyUffner@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Dealer's choice ehh? Let's go with "explosive herpes".

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Doctor's have never seen anything like it before, explosive, just completely explosive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheOgreChef@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

To shreds you say

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Sounds like something will Farrell would say. Approved.

[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Sounds like the basis of a very healthy marriage!

[–] merde@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago

he sounds playful. They will be alright

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago

Once again a random user diagnoses a marriage from a single post. What a time we live in to have access to so many skilled experts capable of diagnosing such things with just a little bit of information!

I think they'll be fine: https://www.reddit.com/r/harrisonburg/comments/1hvdyv8/fake_kidpissed_wife_epilogue/

[–] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

This is definitely healthy marriage shit. And a marriage that is better off than at least half. Humor is a necessary ingredient to happiness and the crazier the better sometimes.

Edit: and if it wouldn't work on your marriage, one or both of you is fragile.

[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I've got some free time but I don’t think I could pass for twenty. RIP, $100.

[–] OmegaLemmy@discuss.online 17 points 1 week ago

Oh shit I wanna do this

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 13 points 1 week ago

Oh I would have totally done this lol

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I really want to know how this played out

[–] turboturtle@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] RattlerSix@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

What a great story. I love both her reaction to his "son" and her reaction to finding out it was an act.

[–] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Thanks! That was a fun read :)

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I like how OP denotes the actors, as to be very clear in his description of how he's either going to get divorced or murdered.

Let's pretend you accomplish this and she sees the err of her ways. Then what? She's going to kill you when she finds out the kid is not really yours.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Actually it went really well. The wife thought it was hilarious, according to the husband.

"I can't decide what amused her more... the effort I put into the ruse or the fact that I ended up proving her right in the process. [...She said] 'Next time you can save $100 and just assume you're wrong.'"

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'll be damned. He found someone to match his crazy.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not as uncommon as sitcoms make it seem. My wife--brilliant, hilarious, way smarter and better at things than I am--would probably think it was hilarious, too. It wouldn't work for our situation (we got together too early in life for it to be believable), but I wouldn't expect any backlash.

I would expect payback in-kind, though.

[–] NineMileTower@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My wife found out last year that her mom cheated and that her dad was not her biological dad. He didn't know either. 3 months later he died. Then when she found her biological dad, he had just died too. Then her mom got divorced from her current husband.

Ain't NO way am I fucking around with that right now.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Whoa. Yep, I'd call that...like, the dictionary definition of reading the room. Yikes.

load more comments
view more: next ›