this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
123 points (94.9% liked)

Lemmy.world Support

3275 readers
14 users here now

Lemmy.world Support

Welcome to the official Lemmy.world Support community! Post your issues or questions about Lemmy.world here.

This community is for issues related to the Lemmy World instance only. For Lemmy software requests or bug reports, please go to the Lemmy github page.

This community is subject to the rules defined here for lemmy.world.

To open a support ticket Static Badge


You can also DM https://lemmy.world/u/lwreport or email report@lemmy.world (PGP Supported) if you need to reach our directly to the admin team.


Follow us for server news 🐘

Outages πŸ”₯

https://status.lemmy.world/



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm not sure if this is the best place for this post, I'm just curious to see what everybody else thinks.

It seems like a lot of communities (outside lemmy) have had enough and are banning twitter links after Elons recent Nazi salute.

top 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breadsmasher@lemmy.world 48 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Direct xitter links? Yes. Ban them. They bring no value a a screenshot couldn’t provide.

[–] kabi@lemm.ee 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Screenshots can, have been, and will be doctored. Sometimes you read somrthing so insane, you gotta check the source. Except finding anything on that shithole of a site is painful, especially if you don't have an account, quadruply so on mobile.

Both would be a nice compromise.

[–] Thistlewick@lemmynsfw.com 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Anything worth any value on Twitter will be reported on by another source. Link to those if you want corroborating evidence. The point is to not give the Nazis the traffic at all.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah anything posted to Twitter should be taken with a massive grain of salt anyway, so it doesn’t really matter if it’s a screenshot or a direct link, it should only be considered a hint of something maybe true but never as proof.

[–] Lennnny@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago

Yes. Fuck giving them traffic, and you have to log in to view parts of it anyway - screenshots are better if truly needed.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

The playstation community just did.

And nothing of value was lost.

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 19 points 1 week ago

Just screenshot it. I want nothing to do with that cesspool.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago
[–] Eldritch@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

Why not just post screenshots? Not give anyone reason to accidentally give them traffic. People can still see what you wanted, win win

[–] Blaze@feddit.org 13 points 1 week ago

If Lemmy doesn't, who will?

[–] That_Devil_Girl@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

Yes. Twitter has nothing of value left to offer the world. Anyone who's still on that platform is either not paying attention or supports neo Nazis.

[–] ctx@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Yes, ban direct links to twitter.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 11 points 1 week ago

Yes they should be banned

[–] rosahaj@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 week ago

blahaj local here, I believe that there is little to be gained from allowing continued linking to these walled gardens (especially since accessing anything on Twitter without an account is more of a hassle than it's worth.) I think it would be good to cut off the Twitter links, possibly with the rare exception for archive pages deemed able to promote discussion well enough to be worth compromise?

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 10 points 1 week ago

I'm not a .world local if that matters, but yes.

[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 9 points 1 week ago
[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Twitter no longer exists.

But X links should, indeed, be banned.

[–] Mr_Blott@feddit.uk 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If the Musknazi wants you to call it X, YOU FUCKIN CALL IT TWITTER

[–] BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That is an excellent point.

[–] Vieric@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

I would say yes at this point, for sure.

[–] flames5123@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No. As much as I disagree with giving them traffic, they do allow for context if someone wants to divulge. Can we ban them from the main post link and have them in the description of the post?

[–] aaa999@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

I don't have an account and musk stopped letting people without accounts read twitter links a while ago

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

No, lemmy.world should not censor itself. I can decide for myself which link I click on. If people think they have to link to Twitter, then let them do it. I will never do that and I will never follow Twitter links. But I would still like to be able to do so on principle.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago

Igen

Same in English.

εŒγ˜γ§γ™γ€γ§γ‚‚γ«ζ—₯本θͺžγ€‚