this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2025
282 points (92.0% liked)

hopeposting

1046 readers
191 users here now

Proof of the indomitable human spirit.

Rules:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

I'm very much doom driven, but the past has taught me that humans tend to work their way through it.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Some humans will work it out for themselves.

That is all.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

China also is "stable" but an authoritarian shit hole.

Life and the economy goes on but under an oppressive regime

[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Don't think so. Nothing in history proves we can. This era seems to be on the way out so we we'll have some sort of collapse.

[–] kazaika@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Nothing in history proves we can

Bruh, now you're just talking nonsense. History proves shit about the future, and its kinda sad that you cant name a single great thing in history

[–] Ookami38@sh.itjust.works 2 points 6 days ago

We're still here. Through each of the roughest times in history, humans have pulled through. We'll keep pulling through, of that much I'm certain. Will it be in the same form? Eeeeeeeeeeh

[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I'll be brave and say that I don't think we deserve to.

This species deserves nothing but a quick extinction.

Edit: Sorry didn't realize what community this was

I wish I could still belive that

[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Here's what's going to happen.

Climate change will continue to ravage our planet, devastating vulnerable communities, fueling a great migration to areas that we can still use for agriculture. This scenario means that even if your area isn't terribly affected, you will be affected by the rise in immigration to your land.

As we all know, necessity is the mother of invention so this will lead us to:

-Finally bring to fruition stable fusion nuclear power.

-Invest in space travel on a scale we can't even imagine today.

-Place colonies on the moon.

-Figure out and eventually deploy terra forming operations to bring our planet back from the brink.

Also a lot of us will be psyched to find out that in the future, we'll want to build dwellings under ground, so yes, you may yet get to live in a hobbit hole, and have a small farm on your roof.

Oh yeah, and Greenland will be MAD valuable as an agricultural hub, which is why (I suspect) drumpf is trying (like a child would) to take it.

[–] Lemminary@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

For a little while. Then it's back to plundering and pillaging. :/

[–] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 59 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, yes. Humanity as a whole will probably stop sucking ass before it gets wiped out completely. Though it might cost us a few billion. Lives, I mean, not dollars.

[–] Dagnet@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago

Got me worried there for a min, losing dollars would be unrecoverable! /s

[–] hedge_lord@lemmy.world 27 points 1 week ago

Objection: feels like copeposting

[–] TheBat@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yeah, good luck fighting entropy.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Also basic human behavior.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 6 points 6 days ago (2 children)

self-destruction neoliberal capitalism is not basic human behavior

[–] leftytighty@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 days ago

thank you for making this point. capitalist realism is a huge barrier to people imagining a better future.

[–] earphone843@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Of course it is. Humans have always been extremely greedy and selfish.

Things would be much worse if we didn't have regulations to control human behavior, and in the US we're about to experience what happens when those regulations disappear.

No, they haven't always been extremely greedy and selfish. All social animals strike a balance between self-interest and group-interest, and humans are no different.

Some humans have always been extremely greedy and selfish. And some of those humans have always been charismatic and persuasive. And many other humans are not equipped to differentiate between emotionally persuasive and right. Well-intentioned humans will often connect themselves to the wrong people or ideas.

That's not really their fault. We're repurposing evolution's creations for things they weren't built to do. We're trying to build empathy and connection with people that are chronologically, geographically, and/or psychologically distant from us.

And unfortunately we're trying to do that while a handful of us try to sever those connections and build physical and metaphorical barriers between us for their own self-interest.

Most of us struggle with the ability to feel empathy and connection with our own future selves. We often choose instant gratification over personal benefit, we often choose to forego temporary burdens in the present at the foreseen expense of finding greater burdens in the future.

That's not greed or self-interest. That's the opposite of self-interest. That's just the burden of the rising ape. But it's no reason to lose hope, and it's no reason to stop trying.

The most important proof that humans aren't all greedy and selfish is that people are still trying to do better. We are still trying to build better connections, even as others try to tear them apart.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 days ago

humans lived in small communes for most of their history.

the renaissance wasnt people deciding suddenly to be rational and inventive. the feudal religious system was dying and stopped being the limiting factor.

capitalism is our modern day limiting factor, the one that encourages us to be greedy to survive when we dont need it anymore.

[–] Alienmonkey@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

Surfing entropy.

Ride the stardust wave into an agricultural mountain dew future. It's what plants love.

[–] RagnarokOnline@programming.dev 15 points 1 week ago

I don’t want to get along with anyone, but this is the outcome I hope for.

(Everyone just needs to come to the conclusion that I’m right and we’ll be able to live happily.)

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, absolutely. Humans will prevail. But right now the forest is on fire and many of us are the small bits on the forest floor that will be completely consumed by the oncoming fire. The destruction will test the perseverance of everything and the burgeoning that follows will be another minor Renaissance, like the period between WW2 and the Internet. When ignorance reigns and sequels are the only entertainment, expect the worst.

[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

How many died before France got the revolution it needed to eventually make things better?

How many need to die right now for shit to happen so things finally start improving?

We might prevail in the end, but how long will we suffer in the meantime?

[–] Cris_Color@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I have no idea if we will, but I want to give it the best god damn chance we can get.

[–] inv3r5ion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 week ago

Fun fact: my exes great grandfather modeled for Rockwell for this painting.

[–] don@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Depends on what one calls a good future. On a long enough timeline, everything (probably) decays to photons in an infinitely expanding universe. On an even muuuuch longer (est. 10 to the 10th to the 10th to the 1.2nd years) timeline, another iteration of this exact universe’s timeline spontaneously exists all over again.

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

Nah, climate change will either finish us or make us beg for death.

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 3 points 1 week ago

We must assuredly all hang together, or assuredly we shall all hang separately.

[–] ArchmageAzor@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

How dare you? Drop that optimism and start panicking like the rest of us!

[–] ladicius@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's not an unpopular scenario - it's just completely improbable.

[–] CompostMaterial@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The more likely scenario being that we wipe ourselves out long before evolving to learn to work things out.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

There is a theory that the reason we haven't found other intelligent life in the universe is that it inevitably destroys itself.

[–] lurch@sh.itjust.works 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If we hadn't had fossil fuels, including Uranium and Plutonium, we wouldn't be able to wipe ourselves out quickly and likely a few would always survive all self made catastrophies.

There may be species out there who don't have this stuff on their planets. Maybe we'll meet them one day.

[–] MelodiousFunk@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago

The most probable of the great filters IMO.