theory

672 readers

19 users here now

A community for in-depth discussion of books, posts that are better suited for !literature@www.hexbear.net will be removed.

The hexbear rules against sectarian posts or comments will be strictly enforced here.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Vampire@hexbear.net

ChestRockwell@hexbear.net

Cowbee@hexbear.net

The News Megathread Imperialism Reading Group: Week 3 - January 27th to February 2nd, 2025 (hexbear.net)

submitted 4 days ago by SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net to c/theory@hexbear.net

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Welcome to the third week of the Imperialism Reading Group! Last week's thread is here.

This is a weekly thread in which we read through books on and related to imperialism and geopolitics. How many chapters or pages we will cover per week will vary based on the density and difficulty of the book, but I'm generally aiming at 30 to 40 pages per week, which should take you about an hour or two.

The first book we are covering is the foundation, the one and only, Lenin's Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism. We will read two chapters per week, meaning that we will finish reading in mid-to-late February. Unless a better suggestion is made, we will then cover Michael Hudson's Super Imperialism, and continue with various books from there.

Every week, I will write a summary of the chapter(s) read, for those who have already read the book and don't wish to reread, can't follow along for various reasons, or for those joining later who want to dive right in to the next book without needing to pick this one up too.

This week, we will be reading Chapter 5: Division Of The World Among Capital Associations and Chapter 6: Division Of The World Among The Great Powers.

Please comment or message me directly if you wish to be pinged for this group.

top 6 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] StillNoLeftLeft@hexbear.net 4 points 1 day ago

Trying not to tell too much about my life, but just wanted to share this moment today. A client of mine brought me candy today at work, just out of the goodness of their heart. I work with homeless people or people in risk of becoming homeless and this was because I managed to get them a safe place to sleep in last week. This person has nothing, no money and no home to go to. Yet they decided to use those smallest of resources to bring me something nice.💔

These are the people we are leaving behind, always genuinely the best people. It crushes me a little inside when I know I am going to my safe home after my work is done and so many are in such precarious positions, often the kindest of us. Not that anyone needs to earn safety or shelter in any way.

[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago

This week, we'll be halfway through Imperialism!

@RedDawn@hexbear.net @Cowbee@hexbear.net @kittin@hexbear.net @Sebrof@hexbear.net @TrippyFocus@lemmy.ml @OrionsMask@hexbear.net @0__0@hexbear.net @SummerIsTooWarm@hexbear.net @mbt2402@hexbear.net @BanjoBolshevik@hexbear.net @BodyBySisyphus@hexbear.net @NinjaGinga@hexbear.net @Test_Tickles@hexbear.net @luddybuddy@hexbear.net @Coca_Cola_but_Commie@hexbear.net @niph@hexbear.net @redline@lemmygrad.ml @glimmer_twin@hexbear.net @MF_COOM@hexbear.net @MiraculousMM@hexbear.net @StarkWolf@hexbear.net @StillNoLeftLeft@hexbear.net @BGDelirium@hexbear.net @THEPH0NECOMPANY@hexbear.net @devils_dust@hexbear.net @iridaniotter@hexbear.net @Ehrmantrout@hexbear.net @quarrk@hexbear.net @RaisedFistJoker@hexbear.net @Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net @darkmode@hexbear.net @PaulSmackage@hexbear.net @FunkyStuff@hexbear.net @IceWallowCum@hexbear.net @Babs@hexbear.net @PerryGirl@hexbear.net @Rojo27@hexbear.net @OgdenTO@hexbear.net

[–] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is a couple chapters behind (apologies), but in chapter 3 when Lenin quotes Siemens stating to the Reichstag that 'the one pound share is the basis of British Imperialism,' why exactly is that? One pound shares allow for freer movement of capital which facilitates monopoly? More scattered investors holding small shares increases the power of the remaining finance capitalists that control ~40% shares?

[–] SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net 4 points 3 days ago

My understanding of his argument (and I would love for somebody to correct me if you don't think I get the full picture!) is as follows, and is basically two-pronged:

First prong: The lower the minimum denomination of shares, the more total investors there can be (as most of society is impoverished and would like to, if possible, put some of their savings into banks and shares and such in order to grow their savings). The more total investors, the less united the control over a company can be, as many tiny shareholders will probably not show up to meetings. The less united the control, the more likely that a single corporation can take full control over it with relatively few shares. So, as you say, "More scattered investors holding small shares increases the power of the remaining finance capitalists that control ~40% shares?"

Second prong: The more people put their money into these shares, the more invested they are in the success of the corporation, so as to grow their savings. Therefore, the proletariat becomes kinda bourgeois-ified (most notable in Britain in Lenin's day, and in the US in the current day) because they know that imperialist international relationships - colonies and such - must be maintained. Therefore, naive "democratization" by making each worker a shareholder is actually counterproductive to socialism.

[–] anarchoilluminati@hexbear.net 3 points 3 days ago

Damn, how did I not notice this reading group?

I just read and finished this last week. Damn, I'm going to go through the other threads.

[–] UnitedNations@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

EDIT: This is not the news megathread. Was too quick and did not fully read title