this post was submitted on 29 Sep 2023
85 points (100.0% liked)

Games

16796 readers
570 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] funnystuff97@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

HOLY FUCK I AM SO FUCKING HARD

...small concern though: I currently use the rail planner a lot, usually to map out how I want my outposts to look at long distances. If the rail planner, particularly shift + click, is actively looking for rails to snap to, I hope it won't greedily try to snap to rails I don't want it to. I'm sure the devs already have this considered, but I just want to make sure that if I have multi-layer train crossings, and I'm trying to plan them out before I actually build them, that I'm able to path out rails behind an elevated rail without the rail planner assuming I want the rail to connect to the elevated rail. I hope that won't be an annoying issue.

[–] Sylver@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Best money I’ve ever spent on a game

[–] Eylrid@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Best money I'm ever going to spend on an expansion

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 14 points 1 year ago

Holy crap finally, multilevel railway!

[–] dom@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I guess I should learn how to use rails now

[–] Ithi@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Rails are amazing and I don't even fully utilize them with all the cool logic stuff you can do.

They get rid of so much clutter when done right.

[–] Eylrid@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Between this and the new more flexible curves rail spaghetti is going to be off the chain!

[–] aesopjah@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Goddamn, the devs of this game are just so passionate about it and it shows in the game itself, love to see it!

[–] bloopernova@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm guessing that you will need long-armed robots to un/load cargo from an elevated rail?

[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think they said you can't interact with trains on elevated rail at all, un/loading works only on ground level.

[–] ashok36@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fine with me. Dyspon sphere program does the whole build up instead of out thing and I don't like it as much. I think satisfactory started the trend though.

[–] Acters@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Me too, wish it was for making game play easier instead of an arbitrary game play mechanic that forces you to play a certain way. I am happy that factorio is very easily mod able, and you can install mods that expand or remove limits on players.

[–] bloopernova@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Acters@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't worry there will be a mod

[–] Chailles@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

And now introducing: Elevated Everything