this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
378 points (92.4% liked)

Technology

62073 readers
5025 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/54702508

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 26 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Man, real countries are doing this shit while the US is doing an illegal war on the thought crime of being"woke".

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (5 children)

China has this covered hands down. If you say Winnie, two mean looking Chinese men appear behind you.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Horses are fucked in China. They winnie all the time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] PhAzE@lemmy.ca 28 points 4 days ago (4 children)

There's a bunch of places in the US that has 10 Gbps speed, so this jump to 50 Gbps is not too shocking. Writing it as 50,000 Mbps to make it seem huge is an interesting take.

[–] MajorasMaskForever@lemmy.world 12 points 4 days ago

It's so incredibly annoying when people use smaller order of magnitude descriptors simply so they can then write more zeros. A good chunk of the time too it feels like it's done to distract from a different point or to exaggerate without technically lying.

Doesn't help that technical jargon is only best used when communicating with someone in that field or understands it. Big number + alphabet soup always seems scary 😞

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I’m just pretty sure my fiber vendor offers 10Gbps service but I’ve never had reason to check whether they offer it here. There app is not responding so I can’t verify …. They are better at fiber service than maintaining an app.

Personally I think gig fiber is the current sweet spot:

  • price has come down a lot
  • very low latency
  • high reliability
  • more than enough for most people

It’s technically overkill for most people but a huge benefit is it works. For everything. Cable tends to be way over-provisioned for plus asymmetrical and higher latency, so you won’t get the bandwidth you pay for, uploads will be slow, and latency may hit you while gaming or streaming. Most of the time cable or slower fiber will be good enough but you will hit glitches, buffering. My gigabit fiber has been rock solid for years, never a glitch, never a buffering, no slow uploads, never impacts gaming. It’s near perfect. I dont mind the extra cost due to the huge savings from dropping cable and phone

[–] shasta@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Worse than that, from the article:

The 50G-PON ITU-T standard supports theoretical speeds of up to 50 Gbps downstream and up to 25 Gbps upstream, though current real-world deployments in China - led by China Telecom, its regional branch Shanghai Telecom, and ZTE - typically provide 10 Gbps all-optical access.

So the 50G number is just theoretical and actual real world speed is only 10G. Due to regulations in the US, advertisements would need to advertise the real speeds. So this is really just the same as 10Gbps anywhere else.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago (7 children)

It will be in 10 years when a majority of their country has access to it. Industrialization in China is on a different level.

In less than 25 years they will take the top spot for global economy, and likely everything else.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yep, and in ten years, we’ll still be arguing about whether dsl counts as “broadband”

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 94 points 6 days ago (6 children)

50gbps **shared line using passive optical splitters. Bit misleading there Chona, nobody is getting an actual 50gbps connection to their house.

[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 39 points 6 days ago

Getting real tired of these „China is 30 years ahead of us“ clickbait headlines on an almost daily basis. They‘re always completely overblown and sadly really warp the public perception of the country and their government.

[–] cyberpunk007@lemmy.ca 23 points 6 days ago (8 children)

I'm sure the hardware for 50Gbps optics wouldn't be cheap for the consumer 🤣

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] kalleboo@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Most residential fiber globally currently is GPON with a 1-2 Gbps shared line using passive optical splitters, split up to 32 ways. Raising that shared line to 50 Gbps is a great upgrade.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] diffusive@lemmy.world 67 points 6 days ago (15 children)

Written in Switzerland from my 25GBps symmetric connection (for like 60$/month) that I have for a couple of years 🤷‍♂️

Also for personal use the difference between 1Gbps and 25 (or, I guess, 100GBps) is essentially zero… your everyday connection is via WiFi (good luck to get more than 1GBps there) or on a home server/NAS/workstation where likely you run batch jobs where the difference between 1 minute or 5 minutes is not a huge deal (and yes I am not saying 1 vs 25 because at that speed generally the bottleneck is the place where you are getting data from)

[–] lemmyingly@lemm.ee 8 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I have a 40Mbps down, 5Mbps up connection for $30. Consider yourself as real lucky.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I was on that until the other week, when my area finally got upgraded to 1Gbps.

It's nice for big downloads (and with game sizes what they are now, that bit is a big difference), but for regular use? Not really a vast change. It's nice that your bandwidth doesn't suddenly vanish when one of your unattended devices decides to wake up and download a 20GB update for a game you haven't played in months I guess.

[–] lemmyingly@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you've misread my comment or there is some misunderstanding.

Just in case, it's a misread, my speed is 40 Mega bit per second - not 40 mega byte per second.

I have to choose what I want to do and do those things with consideration, otherwise things like streaming will buffer a lot.

If you thought I said 40MBps, then I'd agree, as i imagine the difference between 320Mbps and 1Gbps won't be noticed unless you're timing large downloads.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I know. I was on 30Mbps. Took like 5 minutes to download a gigabyte. Now it takes around 10 seconds.

But most video streaming sites are well below that, and web pages are a few MB tops. The only noticeable difference is when doing larger downloads.

[–] lemmyingly@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

You and I have completely different views and experiences on this, as I don't agree with your statement at all; which is why I think you've misunderstood.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

Not to mention the server is the bottleneck at that point. I have access to 2.5Gb/2.5Gb but only pay for 500/500 because, even that is faster than most servers, and of course all the mobile devices aren’t pushing more than 400 on WiFi.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 5 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Interesting--when I made a similar argument on Reddit some years ago, networking geniuses assured me that they needed more than 1Gbps to play lag-free games. This on /r/programming, no less.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Glitchvid@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago

Seconding this, while I have the option for multi-gig at my address, I don't have the need, once you get around gigabit upload speeds life is fine.

I can upload hours of uncompressed gameplay to YouTube in under an hour, and that's limited mostly by their ingest speeds (≈300Mbps) and not my end, so that's plenty.

With all that said, the option for consumers is great, I'm thankful I have that choice, wish more people had it too.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 11 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I would rather have 50,000,000,000bps

[–] JabbaTheThott@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Bigger Number = Better

The math is mathing correctly

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (4 children)

Why do I care? Why it need to be so fast?

What is everyone doing with their internet that I'm apparently missing out on?

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 20 points 4 days ago (22 children)

Decades ago....

"Why do I need electricity? I have candles. Lights seem excessive."

Yes, but once most people have electricity, new products will be designed to take advantage of it. Now you can have a washing machine, for example.

Broadband is the same. Once most of your population has high bandwidth, we can start to design things that will use it. Right now we're still designing for DSL speeds.

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] frezik@midwest.social 9 points 4 days ago (2 children)

360 VR experience with 16K resolution, highly textured touchable surfaces, and smell-o-vision. Only a $40 Meta subscription with ads.

[–] realharo@lemm.ee 5 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Latency is much more critical than bandwidth for any sort of real-time VR.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

For me, the normal stuff. Mathematically my gig fiber is overkill for my usage. And internet services can rarely keep up with that - you want to download some update or new game? It’s throttled at the source regardless of your internet connection

But in reality when I visit people with “fast enough” internet, I always see glitches and buffering and lag. While it usually serves the need and sometimes gets advertised bandwidth, gig fiber always serves the need. I shouldn’t have to complain about my network or worry about how many streams or how big a download or how many people on their phones. I should never worry about lag during games or interrupted video calls. And I shouldn’t have to worry about sketchy broadband providers (like xFinity/ConCast) way over provisioning their lines or otherwise never delivering marketed bandwidth.

Gig fiber delivers. Always. Like any good infrastructure you don’t even have to think about it: it just always does the job

But computers are getting faster - it seems like even medium level laptops are coming with 2.5Ge, and everything is more and more digital, and we expect more all the time. Yes I do expect to want a faster connection within 5-10 years even without doing anything high bandwidth. Heck, if history holds, another couple upgrades of JavaScript and we’ll need 50G to load web pages

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

640kb should be enough for anybody.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 14 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Meanwhile, Telia in Estonia: "The Estonian customer doesn't prioritize connection speed or price, that's why we don't need to offer competitive speed/price ratios compared to what we have in other European countries"

[–] ZiemekZ@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Seems surprising, especially because Estonia is known for its digitized government. I logically thought that it'd be complemented with decent Internet coverage.

[–] boonhet@lemm.ee 7 points 4 days ago

We have roughly the same problem that the US has, where they've paid the big ISPs to put fiber everywhere and all that money got pocketed. Well, Estonia's first few big fiber projects were all through Telia. Telia put down way less fiber than promised and constantly kept saying the lines were already all committed so they couldn't rent it out to competitors.

This I believe started before we even had Telia here - We had Eesti Telekom, later known as Elion, and then finally it was acquired by Telia. The same company has had a semi-monopolistic status pretty much all the time. Tele2 and Elisa exist, but they've never had the sweet ass contracts Telia's always had.

This is slowly starting to change with the currently ongoing broadband project where you can get an ISP-neutral fiber connection installed for like 99€ or 199€, regardless of how much work it is to get the lines to you, but I'm not sure this is even available if you've already got Telia's monopoly fiber installed. It's very slow to roll out and every year or 2 they choose a bunch of municipalities with problematic Internet access and then if you live in one of those, you can apply. This has been a godsend, because it got me fiber at home, after years of only being able to get 12/1 mbps through Telia copper.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago (5 children)

AT&T still hasn't installed fiber in my old neighborhood where one of their lines cuts straight through a row of houses that conveniently do get fiber, while everyone else is stuck on cable.

Did I mention they received billions in federal funding to upgrade everyone?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Kushan@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago (4 children)

We're testing this same tech in the UK as well: https://www.ispreview.co.uk/index.php/2025/02/openreach-and-nokia-claim-uks-first-live-test-of-50gbps-broadband.html

China might be a little ahead but it's hardly a leapfrog.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] synicalx@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago

Very cool and they should keep doing this, but no one’s CPE is going to be able to do anywhere near this speed unless they plan on giving everyone large enterprises routers for home use.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 20 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (23 children)

We already have private 100gbps in Australia and our public network just trialled it last year so rollout is expected this year there as well.

Why is anyone celebrating 50gbps? I can’t imagine Australia is anywhere near leading here.

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Those will be some hot NICs.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›