this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
617 points (99.4% liked)

politics

19829 readers
4441 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez denied claims that she is secretly wealthy, stating she is worth less than $500,000 and doesn’t trade stocks or take corporate money.

Her financial disclosures show modest savings and student debt.

Some conservatives on X, despite opposing her politics, praised her perceived integrity.

Accusations of political corruption have surged online, partly fueled by Elon Musk.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] solaceinrage@lemmy.world 1 points 39 minutes ago

I don't think people realize how big the crossover is between AOC and Trump. A lot of centrists that flipped were Bernie bros. that tired of stuff like identity politics and the DNC backstabbing that shafted Bernie.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl -5 points 44 minutes ago

Bitch is rich, Jesus I didn't realize she's also a plutocrat

[–] onlyoneIbought@r.nf 9 points 2 hours ago

I love it when rich guys pretend to hate corruption. You ARE the corruption, idiot

[–] 2ugly2live@lemmy.world 26 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That's because she's actually trying to help people, and you don't get rich helping people.

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl -4 points 40 minutes ago (1 children)

Well obviously you do. Or she isnt trying to help people. She admitted to having hundreds of thousands of dollars

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago

Damn man, learn to read an article.

[–] fuck_u_spez_in_particular@lemmy.world 18 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Accusations of political corruption have surged online, partly fueled by Elon Musk.

Lol, says the guy who's currently at the top of corrupting world-politics...

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 11 points 3 hours ago

AKA, every accusation is a confession

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 7 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

she is worth less than $500,000

That sounds like a lot of money still, but I'd imagine public figures can easily leverage that to wealth so makes sense

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 4 points 57 minutes ago

Anyone who owns a home is probably worth more than that.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 1 points 25 minutes ago

Jesus, people need to learn to read a damn article.

Her financial disclosure form last year showed she had no more than $46,000 across her checking, savings, brokerage, and 401(k) accounts, and owed between $15,000 and $50,000 of student loans.

Forbes estimated Ocasio-Cortez's net worth last year at about $125,000 with most of her wealth in a Thrift Savings Plan — a 401(k)-style investment vehicle for government employees that doesn't have to be listed in financial disclosures.

And no it's not that unusual for even president people to have 500k net worth.

[–] bane_killgrind@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 hours ago (3 children)

She doesn't even own her own home, or she lives in a shark at that value. No second property: no cottage or landlording.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

lives in a shark at that value.

Well that's certainly a choice...

It's gonna bite her in the ass.

[–] MothmanDelorian@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

She has to have two places one in DC and one in her district. She like.y cannot afford that at her salary as both places are extremely expensive

[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Man Americans are worth a shitload on average

[–] ALiteralCabbage@feddit.uk 3 points 2 hours ago

Anywhere property is massively over valued this is going to be true.

Even taking off what I owe in mortgage my net worth would make me look pretty well off in the UK, but I earn a pretty below average wage.

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 27 points 7 hours ago

Can we all please notice how under capitalism, you can refer to people being 'worth' a dollar amount? Money is something you have, it says nothing about who you are. I'm fine with having an amount of wealth, but your worth is not measured in dollars, that's fucked

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 23 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

That's still 450k more than me

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 hours ago

About 500k more than me

[–] doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works 32 points 11 hours ago

Look at Oysters Rockefeller over here showing off their 50g's

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 62 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I hope that AOC has a security detail, a go bag and plan, and an ideal state to reside in. It is my expectation for Yarvin's Cabel to try to capture or assasinate her at some point, since she is one of the few major lightning rods to be the president of a Free America. We will need great people to organize the defense of our people against the fascist agenda.

Bernie, AOC, others, stay safe and strong. 🖖

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 1 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

I'm not in the know. What is "Yarvin's Cabel"?

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 3 points 33 minutes ago (1 children)

That is the name that I have given to the authors of Project 2025. It is basically a playbook on how to take over America and to dismantle democracy. Curtis Yarvin is likely the leader of the bunch in a ideological sense. If Trump and Elon is disposed, it would be problematic if Yarvin and his friends didn't get caught in the net. We have to make a point that America's takeover was a planned group effort.

Curtis Yarvin, wikipedia

Project 2025 - Mandate for Leadership, PDF at the Internet Archive

[–] Wiz@midwest.social 1 points 32 minutes ago

Thank you, kind Internet stranger!

[–] Cossty@lemmy.world 50 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Wait.... Muskrat is accusing her of being rich?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 28 points 13 hours ago

It’s pretty absurd that y’all qaeda bitch about all the money that (insert lib politician) makes while throwing money or votes at billionaires who then turn around and accuse lib politicians like AOC or Sanders of being rich.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 95 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (5 children)

I think if we don't start WW3 and nuke the planet she's gonna be the first woman president in the US

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago

I hope so, but she’s going to have to get through at least another four years, probably more, of being ratted and feathered by Republicans, and somehow still look clean

I still contend that was the real problem with Hillary Clinton. Not that she was a poor candidate or hade some questionable decisions but that Repugnants spent years throwing shit at her so she looked like a mess. She was at least as good as a candidate as anyone else and many of the objections were manufactured

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 66 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (5 children)

The DNC would murder her if she broke through their primary defenses and got close enough.

They're fine with losing, the pendulum is part of the grift, what they aren't fine with is losing their half of that bipartisan oligarch gravy train. Our capitalists don't bribe both parties to have those parties stand against economic metastasis at all human cost.

We can have affirmation ribbons and be sucked dry by the oligarchs, or we can have scapegoating and be sucked dry by the oligarchs, that is the extent of our "freedom." Reagan and Kemp saw to that by getting their former opposition on the take.

[–] bayesianbandit@lemm.ee 10 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Serious talk. When are people going to start calling them DINOs. Democrats In Name Only from the Jurassic period.

You think Trump took over the RNC because the old guard liked him?? No he built on the backs of the tea party.

Bernie and the squad were the lefts tea party. What they need now is a charismatic leader to build on it and kick the DINOs out by force.

The DNC is not that powerful. We outnumber them. Stop forgetting we outnumber them.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 1 points 27 minutes ago

I call the old guard Geronocrats myself. They are old, tired, and very much uninspired. Far as I can tell, Bernie is the only ancient congress critter who is worthy of being called a leader.

Just look at the bill Hakeem Jeffries is trying to pass: to make raiding the US treasury illegal. WTF do we need a new laws for that?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 13 hours ago

Don't kid yourself. She'll be the next Bernie.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 310 points 19 hours ago (42 children)

AOC feels like the only hope America has at any improvement.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 9 points 11 hours ago

So of course Pelosi shafts her at every turn.

load more comments (41 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›