this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
545 points (99.5% liked)

politics

19829 readers
3906 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez denied claims that she is secretly wealthy, stating she is worth less than $500,000 and doesn’t trade stocks or take corporate money.

Her financial disclosures show modest savings and student debt.

Some conservatives on X, despite opposing her politics, praised her perceived integrity.

Accusations of political corruption have surged online, partly fueled by Elon Musk.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 2 points 40 minutes ago

she is worth less than $500,000

That sounds like a lot of money still, but I'd imagine public figures can easily leverage that to wealth so makes sense

[–] qevlarr@lemmy.world 12 points 3 hours ago

Can we all please notice how under capitalism, you can refer to people being 'worth' a dollar amount? Money is something you have, it says nothing about who you are. I'm fine with having an amount of wealth, but your worth is not measured in dollars, that's fucked

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 21 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's still 450k more than me

[–] doomcanoe@sh.itjust.works 26 points 8 hours ago

Look at Oysters Rockefeller over here showing off their 50g's

Her salary jumped to like 20x what it was before she became a politician so she’s well on her way to beating them all in a decade or so

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 56 points 11 hours ago

I hope that AOC has a security detail, a go bag and plan, and an ideal state to reside in. It is my expectation for Yarvin's Cabel to try to capture or assasinate her at some point, since she is one of the few major lightning rods to be the president of a Free America. We will need great people to organize the defense of our people against the fascist agenda.

Bernie, AOC, others, stay safe and strong. 🖖

[–] Cossty@lemmy.world 42 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Wait.... Muskrat is accusing her of being rich?

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 19 points 10 hours ago

It’s pretty absurd that y’all qaeda bitch about all the money that (insert lib politician) makes while throwing money or votes at billionaires who then turn around and accuse lib politicians like AOC or Sanders of being rich.

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 86 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (4 children)

I think if we don't start WW3 and nuke the planet she's gonna be the first woman president in the US

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Unless the republicans field a multiple rapist convict again. Then it's a tossup and a guaranteed L, if there's a war somewhere the genocide people can get behind.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 60 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (4 children)

The DNC would murder her if she broke through their primary defenses and got close enough.

They're fine with losing, the pendulum is part of the grift, what they aren't fine with is losing their half of that bipartisan oligarch gravy train. Our capitalists don't bribe both parties to have those parties stand against economic metastasis at all human cost.

We can have affirmation ribbons and be sucked dry by the oligarchs, or we can have scapegoating and be sucked dry by the oligarchs, that is the extent of our "freedom." Reagan and Kemp saw to that by getting their former opposition on the take.

[–] FKA_Demosthenes@lemmy.world 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Now would be a great time to just put the democratic party out of its misery. Looking around the party, we can be comforted that at least it will go peacefully, in its sleep. Let's at least see if we can get a fresh new party out of all this shit.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 7 points 11 hours ago

That would be the golden lining from this whole damn mess - political reforms that make the spirit of the Constitution have genuine power, and a rebalancing of the scales. People like Musk should be extinguished, never to return from that dark cesspit known as capitalism.

[–] bayesianbandit@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

Serious talk. When are people going to start calling them DINOs. Democrats In Name Only from the Jurassic period.

You think Trump took over the RNC because the old guard liked him?? No he built on the backs of the tea party.

Bernie and the squad were the lefts tea party. What they need now is a charismatic leader to build on it and kick the DINOs out by force.

The DNC is not that powerful. We outnumber them. Stop forgetting we outnumber them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 10 hours ago

Don't kid yourself. She'll be the next Bernie.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 294 points 15 hours ago (21 children)

AOC feels like the only hope America has at any improvement.

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 8 points 8 hours ago

So of course Pelosi shafts her at every turn.

[–] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

She needs to just start her own party.

[–] lennybird@lemmy.world 94 points 15 hours ago (4 children)

I'm glad it seems that many democrats are quitting their Gatekeeping bullshit with AOC.

So frustrating to see people so concerned about the perception of some strawman caricature the right manufacture for our best fighters that we turn on our own. If it wasn't obvious, they attack her so relentlessly because they fear her and know her potential more some of our own.

[–] Allonzee@lemmy.world 43 points 11 hours ago

Nancy Pelosi dedicated the month before Trump was inaugurated to ensuring AOC, a spoiler leftist in a sea of her crony neoliberals, didn't get an oversight committee seat.

Neoliberals Democrats hate actual leftwing politicians far more than they hate their fascist opposition party. Makes sense, Fascists and neoliberals have the same bosses and take the same bribe checks.

[–] Tyrangle@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

I'm more moderate and have always respected AOC, but thought she was too extreme to make a good president. I genuinely believe that the president should be someone who wants to build coalitions and steer the country towards a better future without allowing it to fracture. I still believe that, but I recognize now that my way of thinking can't win elections in this modern era of politics. Now is the time for a firebrand - someone who would rather lose than compromise. I would still be worried about civil war if AOC became president, but I'm already worried about that now, so no point in holding it against her.

[–] bayesianbandit@lemm.ee 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

The irony here is AOC is the one who can build meaningful coalitions you haven’t even realized are possible yet.

The working class is the largest player in this game and she speaks directly to the working class of all stripes.

Moderate neoliberal DINOs speak only to capitalists. That’s why they lost their old base who all went to the right.

[–] moakley@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago

AOC can build coalitions. She even wrote legislation with Ted Cruz. She only stopped working with him after he effectively tried to have her killed on January 6th.

[–] SabinStargem@lemmings.world 7 points 11 hours ago

I think compromise can only work, if the the other guy thought they could lose it all if things went terribly. Compromising ahead of time says "We both get something, no matter what." Which in turn removes the fear of loss.

This is a bad quality in a politician, as it excuses sleeping at the wheel. There is no fire under their ass to keep them awake.

[–] Donjuanme@lemmy.world 23 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

A thought I had a few days ago,

The left is all about inclusivity and forgiveness unless you've made any amount of mispropriety, then it's a race to drop you as quick as possible.

The right is all about being held accountable for your transgressions, law and order, you do the crime you pay the time, but they have 0 cares about their leaders being held accountable.

I feel like each party is the watchdog for the others politicians, and the left is way too accepting of the right wings transgressions, while the right wing hammers the left as quick and hard as possible (except we just do it to ourselves!)

[–] knightly@pawb.social 21 points 12 hours ago

I agree with you, except the Democrats are only "left" when compared to Republicans. The USA has a conservative party and a fascist one.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] _wizard@lemmy.world 35 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Take a peep into Jeff Jackson, NC AG. Hoping for big things out of him.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 51 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Just looked him up and he looks shit.

AOC is great because she is outspoken and holds actual left wing values compared to 99.9% of her party.

This clown seems like a Kamala-lite with his boasting on his law enforcement and military service history.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 28 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

We would need 60 of her in the senate, or literally anybody else on the blue team, for America to have any hope. Otherwise Republicans will filibuster any spec of salvation.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 19 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Which is why, for now, the Democrats need to be pulling all the tactics McConnell demonstrated for them under Obama.

FILIBUSTER EVERYTHING.

This is not the time for Democrats to be the Party of smooth-running government.

Use those loopholes the Right-stealers gave themselves in the rules. The only thing they should be voting for is bills that entangle, delay, or reject Trump's blitzkrieg.

And if they have to talk across the aisle, it should be to remind them that if they hand the Power of the Purse over now, they'll never get it back and they'll lose all their value to lobbyists, all their stock-market prescience, all their importance back home.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 11 hours ago (6 children)

That's the fun part, the Republicans in Congress are hardly even attempting to pass any laws. All they're doing is appointments, which can't be filibustered as of 2013, except for SCOTUS which can't be filibustered as of 2017.

All they have to do now is not stop Trump and they win, because Congress is in charge of reigning him in.

You cannot filibuster against doing nothing.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 122 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I think regardless of whether you are Republican or a Democrat, AOC is probably the closest to what a representative should be. Now whether you agree with her or not is a different discussion entirely, but that's not the point I'm trying to make. She's just the only one that actually seems to give a shit about who she represents. Whereas both for Republicans and Democrats the vast majority of our "representation" are crotchety and corrupt old people that don't give a shit anymore.

[–] octopus_ink@lemmy.ml 38 points 14 hours ago (19 children)

She’s just the only one that actually seems to give a shit about who she represents. Whereas both for Republicans and Democrats the vast majority of our “representation”

While I agree with almost everything you said, there's really no good reason to make a statement like that and leave Bernie in with the "vast majority" group. 🙂

The man has walked the walk for a very long time. (Yes he's too old to run for office now, but he deserves his due!)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bernie_Sanders#Political_activism

[–] zmrl@lemmy.zip 22 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I saw a recent interview Bernie did with AOC and I learned that she got into politics specifically because she was inspired by Bernie during his presidential run in 2016. Thats something I didn't realize and it explains a lot why we feel a lot of the same energy from them.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 62 points 15 hours ago

Man, if you don’t agree with her views, fine whatever. But for people to hate her so much to claim she’s corrupt when she’s clearly not is just silly.

We live in a stupid timeline. More politicians should be like her. We’d all be better off, regardless of which party they were from.

[–] eran_morad@lemmy.world 48 points 15 hours ago (5 children)
[–] niketunic@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

wouldn’t mind if she moved to canada and ran here either. i adore her energy.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›