this post was submitted on 13 Feb 2025
1026 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

63135 readers
3414 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I felt it happen realtime everytime, I still use it for questions but ik im about to not be able to think crtically for the rest of the day, its a last resort if I cant find any info online or any response from discords/forums

Its still useful for coding imo, I still have to think critically, it just fills some tedious stuff in.

[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It was hella useful for research in college and it made me think more because it kept giving me useful sources and telling me the context and where to find it, i still did the work and it actually took longer because I wouldnt commit to topics or keep adding more information. Just dont have it spit out your essay, it sucks at that, have it spit out topics and info on those topics with sources, then use that to build your work.

[–] Dil@is.hardlywork.ing 2 points 1 week ago (25 children)

Google used to be good, but this is far superior, I used bings chatgpt when I was in school idk whats good now (it only gave a paragraph max and included sources for each sentence)

load more comments (25 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Their reasoning seems valid - common sense says the less you do something the more your skill atrophies - but this study doesn't seem to have measured people's critical thinking skills. It measured how the subjects felt about their skills. People who feel like they're good at a job might not feel as adequate when their job changes to evaluating someone else's work. The study said the subjects felt that they used their analytical skills less when they had confidence in the AI. The same thing happens when you get a human assistant - as your confidence in their work grows you scrutinize it less. But that doesn't mean you yourself become less skillful. The title saying use of AI "kills" critical thinking skill isn't justified, and is very clickbaity IMO.

[–] kitnaht@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (10 children)

How many phone numbers do you know off of the top of your head?

In the 90s, my mother could rattle off 20 or more.

But they're all in her phone now. Are luddites going to start abandoning phones because they're losing the ability to remember phone numbers? No, of course not.

Either way, these fancy prediction engines have better critical thinking skills than most of the flesh and bone people I meet every day to begin with. The world might actually be smarter on average if they didn't open their mouths.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That's the same company that approved Clippie and the magic wizard.

[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Linux study, finds that relying on MS kills critical thinking skills. 😂

[–] intensely_human@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

Microsoft said it so I guess it must be true then 🤷‍♂️

[–] Mouette@jlai.lu 2 points 1 week ago

The definition of critical thinking is not relying on only one source. Next rain will make you wet keep tuned.

[–] Guidy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I use it to write code for me sometimes, saving me remembering the different syntax and syntactic sugar when I hop between languages. And I use to answer questions about things I wonder - it always provides references. So far it's been quite useful. And for all that people bitch and piss and cry giant crocodile tears while gnashing their teeth - I quite enjoy Apple AI. It's summaries have been amazing and even scarily accurate. No, it doesn't mean Siri's good now, but the rest of it's pretty amazing.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›