Yeah, it wasn't my brightest moment ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Literally the first part of the sentence lol

I know it's a joke, but you've missed the dollar symbol. That's the fine in USD.

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago

Isn't that... More money than the GDP of the world?

I like me some strawberry milk

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I'm not sure of the exact numbers, but I remember recently listening to a podcast or something where they mentioned that premium users' views are worth a little bit more than ad watchers on average. I'm assuming that's because there's no third party advertiser that needs a cut.

Well I've seen how people have shared the way YouTube have changed their tactics over time and I don't feel like I can blame you for feeling that way.

I got my subscription back when it was named YouTube Red. Like, as soon as it became available in my country. I just always saw it as a good deal, and I haven't really had to see any of that shit personally. I do think the way they're marketing it these days seems to be very annoying though.

In a workshop making shovels for those outside people am I right

I actually in reality live in a really good place for walking and cycling, but I do understand the pain in the ass that is traffic congestion and "just add more lanes, man" mentality.

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago

I like that creators still get some compensation while I get to not think about ads.

[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 10 points 4 days ago

Yes, but car centric planning, man

258
222
Amazon man (lemmy.world)
108
877
Pee posting? (lemmy.world)
488
181
ghetti (lemmy.world)
546
Gosh dawg it (lemmy.world)
452
Veggie (lemmy.world)
422
561
It's too early (lemmy.world)
1045
Brand recognition (lemmy.world)
1
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world to c/sewing@lemmy.world

Excuse the pun in the title. I've got it to work, but looking around doesn't give much info. I'm assuming it might not be an original Singer part. Does anyone know anything about it?

edit: I should clarify that this box contained accessories mainly for the Singer 66k. Most of them identifiable.

edit2: I've found it on this page (in french) towards the bottom. It is indeed an adjustable hemmer without any further info. Might be a Singer part, might not be. Guessing not since it is not marked with a part number.

view more: next ›

ObviouslyNotBanana

joined 1 year ago