this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2025
541 points (97.4% liked)

Science Memes

14599 readers
596 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ranvier@sopuli.xyz 51 points 3 months ago (1 children)

How about just 0 and 1? They didn't specify what base.

[–] Elgenzay@lemmy.ml 45 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Could also say pi is just 10 in base π

[–] C126@sh.itjust.works 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] MBM@lemmings.world 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

9 (the base pi number) doesn't exist because all digits must be less than pi. 9 (the base 10 number) is apparently roughly 22.2021120021 in base pi.

Edit: a bit of explanation for that last one, it's because 2π + 2 + 2/π + 2/π^3^ + 1/π^4^ ≈ 8.99

[–] Zwiebel@feddit.org 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Technically they didn't specify what number their use of the symbol '9' represents!!!!!

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago

They wanted to know how to represent 6, but displayed upside down.

[–] deo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

would all integers necessarily be irrational in base π?

[–] Mohamed@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Except for 0, 1, 2, 3.

Integers are necessarily irrational because π is transcendental and not an algebraic number.

[–] zeca 1 points 3 months ago

how are you defining irrational? the definition i know is not base dependent.

[–] tiramichu@lemm.ee 31 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] nBodyProblem@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

If you wanted it spelled right, you should have talked to an englisher

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

matematician

[–] nicknonya@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 3 months ago

a matematician specializes in palgebra

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Is the decimal point a digit, or a character?

[–] lena@gregtech.eu 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Hupf@feddit.org 1 points 2 months ago

Must be - a digit would be beside the point here.