this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2025
265 points (94.0% liked)

Technology

63082 readers
3538 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] puppinstuff@lemmy.ca 112 points 1 week ago

It didn’t start grey but then I read the issues tracker.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 56 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Because the replacement comes from non-graybeards in FOSS, and their replacement from without-beards in FOSS, and they come from youths in FOSS, and they from teens geeking around with computers, and oops - teens are not geeking around with computers, they are watching reels and scrolling recommendations and doing other bullshit. If they have a PC, it's an unloved work tool for them, with crappy bloated Windows, crappy bloated software for work and studies, not always crappy, but bloated games, you get the idea.

Because there was a generation very fertile on geeks. It's going away. There are demographic pits and there are demographic, what they call them, hills? The point is, we are seeing the effects of the latter.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 24 points 1 week ago (17 children)

and they from teens geeking around with computers, and oops - teens are not geeking around with computers, they are watching reels and scrolling recommendations and doing other bullshit.

"Youth bad." Lazy take. As if everyone in the gray beard generation was tinkering around with computers? Plenty of youths still tinker. Posting condescending shit like this is just going to turn them off from pursuing/contributing.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago

It's not youth bad. It's that in the 80s and 90s, computers were fun and required a lot of tinkering. Nowadays they mostly work. They're boring.

People who tinkered learned stuff. Users just know how to use a couple applications.

[–] Viri4thus@feddit.org 24 points 1 week ago

Gen Z/Alpha are the new boomers. I teach hundreds of so called intellectual cream of the crop per year. It was bad before the pandemic, it's seriously concerning now. The youth has largely divorced from reasoning and are used to reason in simple inputs to simple output. I am genuinely scared.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 13 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Sure, sure, old man. Everything was better when you were young.

There never was a majority of people who were into computers. It was always a minority. And I'd argue that nowadays there's more developers because there's simply more people with access to computers.

Some of them won't like them, some will be neutral and some will be "geeking around".

And having seen some code from people both older and younger, the younger ones are better (note that it's my anecdotal evidence). And you at least can train the younger ones, while the "experienced" will argue with you and take energy out of your day.

I'm so tired of the stupid "when I was young, everything was better". You know what else was exactly the same? The previous generation telling you how everything was better when they were young. Congrats, you're them now.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sure, sure, old man. Everything was better when you were young.

I'm 28.

There never was a majority of people who were into computers. It was always a minority. And I’d argue that nowadays there’s more developers because there’s simply more people with access to computers.

I've literally said that the kind of access to computers matters. In my childhood it was Windows 2000 (98SE when I wasn't intelligent or interested enough). In those greybeards' childhoods - I guess a greybeard is someone who didn't have a computer in their childhood, but with programmable calculators, or automatic devices (like sewing machines) manufactured then, it was easier to grasp the initial concepts.

Human brain is not a condom, it can't just fit something as messy and big even to use as today's desktop OS'es and general approaches and the Web. It will reject it and find other occupations. While in year 2005 the Web was more or less understandable, and desktop operating systems at least in UI\UX didn't complicate matters too much.

Some of them won’t like them, some will be neutral and some will be “geeking around”.

But the proportion will change in just the way I've described.

And having seen some code from people both older and younger, the younger ones are better (note that it’s my anecdotal evidence). And you at least can train the younger ones, while the “experienced” will argue with you and take energy out of your day.

Maybe that's because you are wrong and like people who bend under the pressure of your ignorance. Hypothetically, this is not an attack. Or maybe just those who don't argue, that's a social thing.

Also, of course, people whose experience has been formed in a different environment think differently, and their solutions might seem worse for someone preferring the current environment.

As you said, that's anecdotal.

I’m so tired of the stupid “when I was young, everything was better”. You know what else was exactly the same? The previous generation telling you how everything was better when they were young. Congrats, you’re them now.

Well, this would mean you're tired of your own mental masturbation because this is not what I said.

I'm talking more along the lines of everything coming to an end and this complexity growth being one of the mechanisms through which this industry will eventually crash. Analogous to, say, citizenship through service for Roman empire.

[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Grey-stubble Gen-X'er here... The 80s and (moreso for me) 90s were a great time to get into tech. Amiga, DOS, Win3.11, OS/2, Linux.. BBS's and the start of the Internet, accompanied by special interest groups and regular in-person social events.

Everyone was learning at the same time, and the complexity arrived in consumable chunks.

Nowadays, details are hidden behind touchscreens and custom UXs, and the complexity must seem insurmountable to many. I guess courses have more value now.

[–] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Me, thinking about the days of dial up: 😭

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago

Dzzzz rrrrr bidibidibippbip KRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR...

[–] jbloggs777@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 days ago

Hah. I was just playing a YT video of modem sounds for my son, after showing him some "history" videos about early PCs, BBS's, text adventure and early commodore* and PC gaming.

History? I lived it, son.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Basically everybody making a game for Amiga made the equivalent of their own graphics drivers. Programming direct to the specialized hardware, and M68000 assembly was so easy and intuitive it was a joy to use.
But that way of programming apps is completely obsolete today. Now it's all about abstraction layers. And for a guy like me, it feels like I lost control.
If you want to program "old school" you have to play with things like Arduino.
I'm a relic now, that's just how it is.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Time to program the ESP8266 :-)

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

My wife actually used that for something she needed to be able to remote control a few years back. She tells me it an amazing chip. 😀

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago

Wow cool!

Yes it's one of the most cheapest and amazing chips but also not very known about, or so I feel.

I made a little webserver on it that polled a site I had, so that I could switch (ok, only a led but still) on and off both from the esp and the website. Quite capable little chip.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I think it's more a matter of the ideals of the times, Foss was created in the 80's, as I see it as an ideological child of the 70's, a period of time where progress, optimism and idealism about creating a better future and a better world probably peaked.
Of course there is also idealism today, but it's different, at least the way I see it, the sense of quick progress especially on the humanitarian side is gone, the decades of peace with Russia is broken, and climate change hangs as a threatening cloud above us, and the rise of China creates turbulence in the world order.
So although things maybe weren't actually better in the 80's, there are definitely aspects that look very attractive in hindsight.

But as I see it, the mentality for FOSS is now stronger than ever, because aside from idealism, it's proved itself to also be a pragmatically good choice in many situations. But all the original founders and enablers are of course old today.

And complaining about how "people today" use technology is stupid, because chances are we would have done the same had it been available to us when we were young.

[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world -2 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I disagree with your idea of real world turbulence affecting it. Things were going the wrong way even in 2005. Dotcom bubble, Iraq war, those things - maybe.

I actually think that USSR's breakup is what long-term caused how our world has become worse.

Say, in terms of computers and mass culture too, they sometimes treat the 90s as a result of that breakup, but that doesn't quite make sense, despite a few armed conflicts, it was a gradual process, CIS as an organization was treated as almost a new union in making even in my childhood.

That breakup has released a lot of dirty money into the world, and through not the cleanest people in western countries, too.

And ideologically - the optimist version of the Cold War ending was some syncretic version of the "western" and the "eastern" promises for the space-faring united future. And much of the 90s was about, often dystopian, but fantasies in the context of such an utopia.

IRL both optimist promises were forgotten. Thus the current reality.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Lol yeah that was some anecdotal evidence!

What's next, girls vs boys code? People wearing hats vs people not wearing hats code?

Manager material right there.

BTW if an old geek argues that your code design/decision is bad then you should probably listen. But that's what beginners don't do, they think they know it all...

[–] Thetimefarm@lemm.ee 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think this is also a problem of old timers not being able to articulate their concerns well. There is probably a reason they do or don't do something a certain way, but if they can't explain why, then no one is going to listen. Blindly following someone for percieved wisdom doesn't teach you anything.

I actually like it when someone can show me why I'm wrong, because it saves me time. But if you can't tell me WHY my idea won't work, I'm probably just gunna do it anyway to figure it out myself.

I think this is as much a case of bad teachers as it is bad students.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 0 points 6 days ago

Yes totally. I mean there are the same people just with an age/experience gap.

[–] rikudou@lemmings.world 1 points 6 days ago

Glad you can read and repeat stuff! I presented it as such to avoid wannabe smartasses, guess they still arrived. Since we've touched on the subject of managers and hiring, do you often hear the phrase "not a cultural fit"? Wouldn't surprise me.

If an old geek argues with a senior architect about architecture, I kinda think the architect is the one who's right in 99% of cases.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] syklemil@discuss.tchncs.de 42 points 1 week ago (5 children)

One rather obvious reason is that society has a lot of greybeards in general. The baby boomer generation was named that for a reason, and people have been living longer on average. Lots of countries are struggling with the demographic effects. There's no reason to expect that tech or something even more specific like FOSS would be exempt.

Another aspect here is that FOSS is still kind of new in society. There's just more people who have had the chance to age into FOSS greybeards than when those greybeards were young. (And they were thus likely to a lesser degree blocked by entrenched greybeards when they were getting started.)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›