this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
1616 points (98.4% liked)

memes

12044 readers
3329 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pyre@lemmy.world 128 points 6 days ago (2 children)

funny but make no mistake, the entire purpose of doge is to find funds to divert to rich people

[–] Critical_Thinker@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The money is already diverted. That's what the tax cuts were in 2017.

This is just a way to upset various government agencies that might otherwise not be ok with law being upended to accomplish the goal of eliminating services our elected government has mandated.

The entire legislative branch is broken now.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago

I'm not American, but it seems to me, that to get to where you currently are, the legislative branch probably needed to be already busted.

This just shines a spotlight on how busted.

[–] burgersc12@mander.xyz 63 points 6 days ago (3 children)
[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm five drinks in and this is still what jumped out.

[–] MyNameIsIgglePiggle@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I read the first post, spotted nothing amiss, saw this, thought it was a correction, then noticed they were both the incorrect spelling

[–] cmoney@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago
[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 29 points 6 days ago

The parasite class

[–] icdmize@lemm.ee 21 points 6 days ago

Donald Trump's dad made a lot of his money off of overcharging for FHA housing. Does that count?

[–] uis@lemm.ee 3 points 6 days ago

"Why save billions, when we can save millions?"

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Which SpaceX subsidies are you referring to? Just the contracts they're fulfilling for NASA and the DOD?

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 22 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Nice try.

https://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hy-musk-subsidies-20150531-story.html

Musk is insane and lies when he opens his mouth. The whole operation runs on government dollars and tax breaks.

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I was wondering the same thing. I wasn't aware he got subsidies. The article only pinpoints $4.9B, but it's an old article. Thanks for sharing.

[–] parrhesia@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yes, it talks about spacex winning $17B in federal contracts from the US government. That's not subsidies. The US government is a customer.

If we assume the 1B is the rest for Tesla, that's in EV subsidies. It isn't just Tesla that benefits from those. Any manufacturer that sells EVs does.

[–] parrhesia@sh.itjust.works -1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I just gave you a potential source for the meme but I guess if you really want to ride on his dick, he'sonly had 5 billion dollars in subsidies. And if you really want to be technical, that was as of 2015 before inflation. My apologies for stepping on your toes.

https://fortune.com/2025/02/13/elon-musk-rich-taxpayer-expense/

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 days ago

No need to be so combative. A shitty meme presenting falsehood does not help furthering the cause to tax the wealthy.

[–] Not_a_gov_agent@eviltoast.org 2 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

@IncogCyberspaceUser@lemmy.world

The article linked in the post I'm replying to, while from 2015, details $5.9 billion of subsidies that no-one I know approved in forms including tax breaks, century long $1 leasing deal in New York, rebates, and gifted sellable carbon credits.

This is separate to the $5.5 billion in SpaceTwitter contracts.

Both numbers, have, I'm sure I don't need to check any data sets to see have gone up in the 10 years since.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Looks like state subsidies, not federal?

On a smaller scale, SpaceX, Musk’s rocket company, cut a deal for about $20 million in economic development subsidies from Texas to construct a launch facility there.

Included in the local subsidies is a 15-year property tax break from the local school district worth $3.1 million to SpaceX. O

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 0 points 6 days ago

Nice try, stan

[–] IncogCyberspaceUser@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If that's the case, which I suspect it is, we look really fucking dumb being so hyperbolic(or what would the word be here? I just woke up). Let's not stoop to their level with nonsense like this, there are plenty of legitimate criticisms to be made.

[–] haui_lemmy@lemmy.giftedmc.com 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The complete opposite is the case. Musk is lying through his teeth. The whole world sees it, just some folks still don't want to accept it.

[–] IncogCyberspaceUser@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm not sure what you're trying to say in response to what I said. I'm not denying that Musk lies.
I'm saying calling money from government contracts for NASA and the likes subsidies is not correct. Unless my definition of subsidies isn't right and needs expanding.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'd agree that unnecessary contracts are subsidies but then that just pushes your point down the road a little bit. I'd say that maintaining the ISS isn't unnecessary, for instance.

[–] Argonne@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Maintaining the ISS is absolutely necessary unless you want brainrot like RFK Jr and have all your best scientists move to Chinas new space station projects. The world is a complicated place, but shunning science and space is not the answer

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 6 days ago

That's exactly what I said.

[–] wirebeads@lemmy.ca 121 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Guarantee that’s not going to happen. In fact with all the savings from the other more critical services being defunded, Elon will have more money for his own projects.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 36 points 1 week ago

GIMME ALL YOUR LUNCH MONEY, PUNK! DON'T YOU KNOW THERE ARE PEOPLE STARVING WHO CAN'T BUY GROCERIES???

... Now to buy second dessert with this sudden windfall!

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 54 points 1 week ago

Hey! He EARNED that Welfare UNLIKE those SINGLE MOMS working 3 JOBS!

[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Since they started, how much money in subsidies found its way directly to the American co-president anyway?

[–] Chivera@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Co-president? Elon is the only president.

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago (3 children)

well, the one that hit the news recently is that bullshit $400m 'armored tesla' contract for state department. the one they 'oopsed' and went back to remove tesla by name from.

[–] pivot_root@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

That whole thing sounds rather counterintuitive. Armor is supposed to protect the occupants of the vehicle, but Tesla's crown jewel of armored* trucks has a track record of spontaneous system failures that put its occupants in direct harm.

*with glass windows and steel sheet metal that can't stop a bullet.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Looks like that was initiated under the Biden administration?

The Tesla contract started in the Biden administration "to explore interest from private companies to produce armored electric vehicles," a State Department spokesperson said on Thursday.

Tesla was the only company to express interest in the department's request at the time.

https://www.npr.org/2025/02/13/g-s1-48571/trump-administration-order-400-million-worth-of-armored-teslas

[–] nexguy@lemmy.world 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't matter. Musk must withdrawal his company from consideration due to conflict of interest.

[–] Denjin@lemmings.world 1 points 6 days ago

He's not elected. He couldn't give a f about conflict of interest.

[–] JackFrostNCola@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Armoured tesla...
Was the cybertruck just a soft prototype of the TeslaTank© ?

load more comments
view more: next ›