this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
576 points (95.4% liked)

politics

20563 readers
3979 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Secretary of State Marco Rubio grew visibly frustrated during an ABC News interview when questioned about the Trump administration’s approach to Russia.

Defending Trump’s push for peace talks with Putin, Rubio insisted negotiations were necessary but admitted the administration didn’t know Russia’s demands.

He clashed with host George Stephanopoulos over Trump’s refusal to call Putin a dictator and the U.S. siding with Russia in a recent UN vote.

Rubio also compared Trump’s handling of Ukraine to Biden’s approach to Israel, further escalating tensions.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZombieMantis@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

We're not placating Putin, we're actively realigning ourselves with him. He is our ally in the Moscow-Maralago Axis of Evil.

[–] DicJacobus@lemmy.world 25 points 23 hours ago

having the intelligence to realize, but not have the balls to speak out to the fact that the Russian Mafia just regulatory captured your country is something to melt down over.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 19 points 23 hours ago

The U.S. isn't placating Putin. The Republican party is. Because they're traitors.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah Biden placated netanyahu. It was bad, but for the lowest of bars, he at least was placating an ally instead of giving a hostile power everything they want and yelling at the ally they invaded

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

And placating Netanyahu and is better than finishing off that genocide with a nice ethnic cleansing

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago

Yeah, but holy fuck I'm exhausted at the bar being that fucking low

[–] Scott_of_the_Arctic@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (4 children)

As a European, only the complete collapse of the Russian federation in an acceptable outcome.

[–] nednobbins@lemm.ee 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

What would be the best way for that to happen? More specifically, how can we pull this off safely?

We have very little historical precedent to go on. The USSR collapsed in 1991. There was some nervousness around what was going to happen with all their nukes. Ultimately, we ended up with Russia, led by Putin.

How would we stop Putin from triggering nuclear retaliation?
If we stop that, how do we make sure some other oligarch doesn't immediately take his place?
If Russia were to completely collapse, what would happen to Russia? Would we be willing to let China take over? If not would we be willing to maintain an indefinite occupation of Russia?

There may be good answers to all of these questions. It seems the more practical solution is to contain Russia. Do you think the EU would be ready to adopt a constitution if it came up again?

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 hours ago

Russian federal subjects would semi-autonomously be their own countries. Falling under supervision of the UN and neighbouring countries

But that is on the US and China agreeing to it when currently both are against that

It does give China potentially direct control over some resources they would want but they already can get those without weakening their position

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] KulunkelBoom@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago

This guy sucking putin's asshole says what?

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago

While the title is the usual nonsense, the interview is the usual nonsense delivery that the master of deals is going to save the day, when he couldn't deal his way out of a wet paper bag.

[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Rubio also compared Trump’s handling of Ukraine to Biden’s approach to Israel, further escalating tensions.

Well... that's not too far off

[–] ansiz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

So Trump's going to give Ukraine all the weapons that they want?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago

His handling of Ukraine is like his handling of Gaza, so he'll be giving Russia all the weapons they want.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 day ago
[–] runiq@feddit.org 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I'm beginning to feel there's a fundamental disconnect between the vocabulary of everyday people and the words journalists use. I can only imagine how the dialogue goes around a journalist's house.


"Honey, have you heard about the Winstons?"
"No, why?"
"Fred from accounting SLAMMED they're planning to move to Wisconsin."
"Oh, I see. Did you GRILL him about where exactly they'd be going?"
"Yeah, I HAMMERED him with questions until he MELTED down. IN TEARS, he SCREAMED at me, 'Yeah, somewhere near Madison.'"
"...screamed?"
"You know... politely."

[–] mhague@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

"We had fun at this amazing diner. The food was out of this world!! Literally the best night of my life."

"So you had fun and ate good food?"

Feels like you gotta reach for top shelf words to keep up.

[–] MilitantAtheist@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Placating? More like deep throating. The US is gluckglucking Russia and liking it.

[–] Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 166 points 1 day ago (13 children)

The only person to talk about backing out of NATO since its creation has been Putin/Xi and Trump/Musk. So why wouldn't everyone think it?

NATO is Russia/China's greatest deterrent. It's literally devastating to our national security to pull out--so clearly only a bad actor would want that.... It's pretty goddamn obvious.

Don forget ending all US cyber operations against Russia

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] AvailableFill74@lemmy.ml 69 points 1 day ago (3 children)

This title is misleading. I watched the whole 9min and he was calm and collected in his delivery. Was he frustrated at the leading questions? Yes. Was he melting down? Ya no, not even close.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago

The Daily Beast with a bullshit, misleading, clickbait headline? Surprising.

I'm sure I downvote Daily Beast articles more than any other site. I wish people would find other sources - although the stories might not sound as exciting.

[–] notsoshaihulud@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The summary is reasonable though. Again we are cutting trump and his underlings a ton of slack about his campaign claims of fixing the war in 24 hours, and 6 weeks into his presidency. No, we should not accept political hyperbole just because it comes from trump, and Stephanopoulos was rightly asking how does calling Zelenskyy a dictator (and undercutting Ukraine-supporting allies) but sucking up to putin move peace talks forward?

As I said before, the way trump makes these deals is like putting duct tape on your passenger door, calling yourself a master mechanic, and then blame next mechanic when the car falls apart.

[–] ajikeshi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

seems like trumps 1 day special diplomatic operation failed weeks ago

[–] GaMEChld@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

SLAMMMED! BLASTED! CCCCOMBO BREAKER!

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

the administration didn’t know Russia’s demands.

Liar

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 120 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

Why can't we have a woman president? They're too emotional for politics?

Also: the emotional melt down is a tactic. This is populism trump style, none of this is unintentional

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (26 children)

Just to be fair: Only women can be elected president for the next 47 presidents.

load more comments (26 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Nemean_lion@lemmy.ca 52 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I guess if you don't want the world to think trump isn't sucking putins dick every chance he gets then i guess he should just stop sucking putins dick every chance he gets.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IcedSeraphine@lemm.ee 36 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, TRUmp is placating Putin. He’s got to be a Russian asset.

[–] SupraMario@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Stopping any cyber offense/defense towards russia is just straight up treasonous at this point.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 37 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Biden’s approach to Israel

seems absolutely sane by comparison to your boss, there, buddy.

and if you were going to 'biden' your support for ukraine, there'd be a non-stop airlift going on with equipment and armaments.

load more comments (6 replies)

Rubio also compared Trump’s handling of Ukraine to Biden’s approach to Israel, further escalating tensions.

Distracting from Trump's servile position towards the fascists in control of present day Russia by using the favorite logical fallacy of the USSR, whataboutism, is either highly ironic or very on the nose depending on which axis of the political compass you choose to focus on..

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (15 children)

The problem is that most people handling this current situation through the lens of classic geopolitics

This is not classic geopolitics. This is the ultra wealthy enacting their plan to create a global plutocracy. A ruling class of only the most wealthy in the world.

They believe that their plans are more easily achieved with a Russian empire than with a free Ukraine.

Ask people like Rubio questions using that as the basis, not classic geopolitics.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›