this post was submitted on 03 Mar 2025
25 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmygrad

900 readers
91 users here now

A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I often find non-marxist political science frustrating in ways I can't describe. It always seems focuses on the wrong things yet I don't have the foundation to even begin to critique it.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jin008@lemmygrad.ml 33 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] cimbazarov@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 5 days ago

Unironically, there are so many parallels with Harry potter and the way modern liberals act

[–] Rextreff@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities Capital in the 21st century Principles of Economics by Menger The labour tradition and the paradoxers of politics the little blue book: the essential guide to thinking and talking democratic Arneson, Richard (1982), 'The Principle of Fairness and Free-Rider Problems' Simmons, A. John (1979), 'The Principle of Fair Play' Also the books in this list: https://old.reddit.com/r/neoliberal/wiki/readinglist (don't actually look at the posts, it's pretty cringe)

[–] TankieReplyBot@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 4 days ago

A Reddit link was detected in your comment. Here are links to the same location on alternative frontends that protect your privacy.

[–] Dengalicious@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 5 days ago

I think reading classical liberal authors like Locke, Hume, Mill, Bentham, Ricardo, Smith, Voltaire, and Montesquieu is the best way to understand. (And as an aside, I think absolutely everyone on Earth should read Kant, to understand anything that came after him, it is necessary without a shadow of a doubt, even to understand Marxism). But overall, starting with where these ideas came from is the ideal way in my mind.

[–] Roof_Roach@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 5 days ago

As an absolute ground floor starting point, I’d suggest getting some 101 level textbooks of any non-explicitly Marxist intro political science course taught in a US university. That will introduce you to general topics and the unique language used in the field; you can read on specifics from there using other textbooks or sources given in the 101 books.

[–] ghost_of_faso3@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Foucault and Baudrillard are decent intros if you're trying to understand 1950s-2010s post-modernism and the deviation of marxism that it took.

Further reading I would suggest Georges Battielle, Steven Lukes (He's closer to being a marxist but focuses more on structuralism and power dynamics) and Judith Butler.

Foucault and Baudrillard

To add to this, Gabriel Rockhill, a marxist, does a great critique of this school of western thinking and he even came from it.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-6NNh2EIOa4

[–] guardofrepublic@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 5 days ago

What about Carl Schmitt?He was also influenced by Hegel.