this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
153 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

64655 readers
4402 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
153
Eutelsat almost triples its value on prospect of Ukraine replacing Starlink with OneWeb (www.marketscreener.com)
submitted 2 days ago by Wispy2891@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
5 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

They say they're a viable alternative to starlink and ready to start - not sure how much true is that

I read a musk fan saying "but their terminals aren't made in a NATO country" - isn't the same for starlink?

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 26 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The Americans are definitely going to cut off StarLink, we don't have any option even if OneWeb isn't fully ready.

[–] scratchee@feddit.uk 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, it’ll definitely be worse using a less complete constellation, but at least you can probably trust them to not fuck around and ruin military operations out of malicious political flailing, or whatever it is that Musk is doing constantly, so that’ll be a nice change of pace.

[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

or that you won't get baited&switched with the "we will give thousands of completely free* terminals"

*=each "free" terminal is subject to a $500/month usage fee

[–] Skua@kbin.earth 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I haven't checked all of them, but I looked up the first three receivers listed by Eutelsat Oneweb for "land mobility" usage. One was made in the US and UK, one was South Korean, and the one intended for military usage is Spanish. I guess South Korea is not NATO, but that's about the NATO-est non-NATO country there is

[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

The US made one is the real issue. 😆