this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
59 points (92.8% liked)

World News

42773 readers
3326 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MyDogLovesMe@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Love him, or hate him; Canadians WILL miss Trudea’s steadfast commitment to Canada.

This guy, and his staff, sat across the table and told Trump’s people to pound sand. Over, and over.

Trudeau has shows us, repeatedly, he doesn’t back down from a fight. Especially from the USA.

Freeland is cut from that same cloth. That whole free trade negotiation thing soured Trump on Canada, BECAUSE the Liberal govt wouldnt play his games.

This defiance was repeated again over the last month.

It’s why Trump hate Trudeau, and Freeland. They couldn’t be bought.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 2 points 17 hours ago

I would be happy with Freeland as PM but I don’t think she could win the next election unfortunately. She’s too linked to Trudeau during a time when people are really looking for change. Carney seems to be the only one people are really rallying behind

But yeah agreed about Canadians missing Trudeau. I don’t think there’s anyone who doesn’t have something to say about him (kind of inevitable after a decade in office really) but he’ll be remembered as an amazing PM imo. He was probably the best person to be in charge for the plethora of crises we’ve been through recently

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

As an outsider (UK), Carney is a pretty good choice IMHO. Certainly better than Poilievre. Don't need Canada taking a step to the right at the moment.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

As an outsider (AU) who has heard Poilievre speak on multiple occasions, a wet sack of dog shit would be a better choice than that criminally corrupt cuntrag.

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 1 points 17 hours ago

Yeah, if it was a vote between that dog shit and PP, I would happily vote for the dog shit.

PP is running for PM but he still doesn’t have a security clearance, even after it came out that there was foreign interference within his own party (he’d need the clearance to get the specifics on the interference). He also seems to be struggling to show any real patriotism in the face of all of Trump’s threats. He pretty much always deflects to “Trudeau bad”

I don’t believe that he wouldn’t just sell us out to the USA the minute he takes office