this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
165 points (98.8% liked)

World News

39000 readers
2085 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Chais@sh.itjust.works 46 points 1 year ago

Now that sounds like a good use for taxpayers' money.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

While renewables don't come without costs and downsides, they're a no-brainer, no matter one's politics.

Let's say you don't believe in global warming. Fine. You're an idiot, but fine. Who among those idiots would argue that energy independence is a bad thing?!

Imagine Europe getting off the Russian and Saudi teats. Is anyone seriously arguing that the world shouldn't defang those barbarians and cavemen? Energy independence is a geopolitical win no matter how you slice it. Tell the House of Saud and Putin (along with whatever filthy system the Russians go for next) to go fuck each other.

Energy is the only reason we put up with so much political bullshit in the world. Using the Saudi and Russian examples again, ask yourself how much geopolitical power those countries would hold if we yanked the rug out. Western democracies should make renewable energy a geopolitical goal, even if they ignore global warming.

[–] kjetil@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Renewable energy is literally freedom energy. Geopolitical win for sure

[–] cmbabul@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

If that’s all it would cost it’s a fucking bargain, and if they use that as a stepping stone to being fully supplied by renewable it could be priceless

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 11 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


FRANKFURT, Oct 5 (Reuters) - Europe could wean itself off fossil fuels and create a self-sustainable energy sector by spending around 2 trillion euros ($2.1 trillion) on solar, wind and other regenerative sources by 2040, according to a new study.

It would take another decade to convert the entire energy system, including things such as heating currently powered by oil or gas, to renewables, according to the study, which was shared with Reuters.

"These figures are considerable, but it is important to remember that the European countries are estimated to have spent additional 792 billion euros in the last year just on the status quo system to protect consumers from the effects of the energy crisis introduced by the Russian invasion into Ukraine," the study said.

Last month, European lawmakers gave their final approval to legally binding targets to expand renewable energy faster this decade, a central part of Europe's plans to curb climate change and shift away from fossil fuels.

The scientific study - commissioned by Aquila Capital, one of Europe's largest private renewables investors - echoed industry criticism towards European regulation, asking for faster approval of projects to make sure targets were hit.

It said renewable energy supply would need to grow by 20% per year to meet expected power demand by 2030.


The original article contains 316 words, the summary contains 215 words. Saved 32%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Spaghetti_Hitchens@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's fun sitting here in Texas, watching Europe do these wonderful things.