this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
105 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19104 readers
2449 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

NGP VAN provides tools used by Democrats, from the White House to local school boards, to raise money and mobilize voters. But with new management in recent years, it has been stripping its operations to the bare bones.

The potential decline of these tools — which have given Democrats a significant technology edge over Republicans over the past few cycles — would be so threatening to operations that a handful of top Democratic digital firms recently called a roughly hourlong Zoom meeting with leadership of the company to seek answers. Among their demands: reassurance that NGP VAN wouldn’t dismantle one of its top products, an online organizing and fundraising tool called ActionKit. Without it, Democrats worried about their prospects during the 2024 cycle and beyond.

“I’m hoping that I’m wrong, that we’re all wrong, that everyone’s fine,” said a former NGP VAN employee, granted anonymity to speak candidly about their former employer. “But this could mean something really bad for 2024.”

The alarm relayed on the call reflected a larger concern: that the Democratic Party has grown too dependent on a small handful of companies to carry the bulk of its campaign operations.

Democrats up and down the ballot have long relied on NGP VAN to run their campaigns. Now, consultants and former employees are concerned that repeated layoffs will lead to problems with the party’s most vaunted tech tools. Some consultants are on the precipice of turning their back on NGP VAN altogether, according to six NGP VAN clients who spoke with POLITICO.

But the company’s monopoly-like grip on Democratic campaigns means there’s no clear alternative that can immediately replace it.

all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 63 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Four former employees said the staff cuts could delay response time to client questions, reduce the ability to update the software and slow the ability to address glitches.

“There’s a pattern in Democratic software of creating a tool and then you stop updating it, you stop working on it, you stop developing and creating new releases for it.”

Use. Open. Source. Software.

JFC, people.

If you're using products that are FOSS, it doesn't matter if a single company goes under. You can just take the code to somebody else.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

A big component of the VAN is having access to the names and addresses of likely democratic voters, which I understand this company to basically be selling access to and building tools around.

So it's not so much the data tools so much as the access.

That all being said, 20-16 till now, and the constant physical irritant that was the Trump years have left people pretty damn jaded. I'm a bit dubious about the value of these lists, but without them, a campaign is starting from scratch.

It's a tough thing, but if you need to reach 100k voters to win an election, you need both data and people.

[–] JWBananas@startrek.website 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which open source software do you recommend to replace ActionKit?

https://www.actionkit.com/

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Also, the software only one part of it. the other aspect is the likely voter data for a given race or district.

[–] JWBananas@startrek.website 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And, you know, the payment platform, the hosted APIs, the collaboration tools, the regulatory compliance...

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

yeah idk about the value of any of that, hence the lay offs.

I've worked with the VAN 3 times in a couple different campaigns.

None used the payment platform, the apis, or tools, and I'm not sure what if any regulatory compliance had to do with anything. It's a list of likely voters, not their medical records. I'm not sure there any required compliance whatsoever.

We worked with the lists directly or the campaigns had teams that built infra or reworked the lists for other tools like auto dialers and what not. There are many other options when it comes to tooling around lists, but there really very few places to buy lists.

[–] EnglishMobster@kbin.social -4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When you're out in the field and your FOSS product suddenly has a glitch, who runs tech support for you?

FOSS is great for some things but this isn't necessarily one of them.

[–] wahming@monyet.cc 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You realise there's a whole industry built around consulting services and support for FOSS software like Linux?

[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Alternatively, fork the software and hire your own in-house staff to support the fork. So long as that's allowed in license.

[–] seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 1 year ago

Who runs tech support? The people you hired to run tech support.

[–] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What's to stop some Republican billionaire from buying the company and shutting it down entirely before 2024? Maybe you get sued for damages but that doesn't undo an election. They have to be a lot more prepared for situations like this.

[–] SamsonSeinfelder@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago

It would trigger 5-10 news article in the first week, uproar for the days after in the comment sections and social media, 2 years later an AG would pick up the case, in the 4th year after a report would be released detailing how it was found that a company financed by a billionaire of an opposing party had interfered in the election campaign of the Democratic Party. In the 6th year 2-3 people have to stand trial for these findings. In the 7th year all of them are found not guilty, but the (already shut down) company with the billionaires ties would have to pay a hefty 30.000 $ fine as that was not correct to do. Rinse and repeat.

[–] cyd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Why doesn't the company simply raise prices? It sounds like they have a strong market position, which isn't something normally associated with financial problems and layoffs.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I know of at least one similar company that has intentionally avoided political campaigns because of the inherent instability and problems collecting fees even when someone wins an election, much less loses.

[–] Reptorian@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It would be nice to know which FOSS alternatives exist or alternative routes. There needs to be as many options possible to make sure Republicans stay underwater as they're not a legitimate political party.

[–] knotthatone@lemmy.one 7 points 1 year ago

The Republicans want to end democracy and convert the US to an oppressive fascist oligarchy like Russia, but make no mistake. They are not underwater and they are a legitimate political party with all of the power, funding and infrastructure that comes with it.

They have near absolute control of the judiciary and strangleholds on most of the federal and state legislatures.

The Democrats need to equip themselves to compete with that but I fear they've squandered whatever technology edge they had. One vendor having the ability to screw their entire operation is proof of that.

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

You assume FOSS even exists for this use case, which I sincerely doubt.