this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
158 points (99.4% liked)

Privacy

1733 readers
268 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No reposting of news that was already posted
  4. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  5. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
otter@lemmy.ca
shaytan@lemmy.dbzer0.com
fxomt@piefed.social
158
Turkey sees huge VPN usage spike amid reports of social media crackdown (www.tomsguide.com)
submitted 1 week ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/privacy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
14 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

In my opinion, we really need decentralized, self-hosted infrastructure.

I kind of hope we get a Fediverse alternative for WhatsApp.

I imagine running some kind of relay node on a raspberry pi, for perhaps 20-100 acquaintances. All traffic would be anonymized and encrypted as much as possible. Push notifications replaced by polling. Anonymous broadcast groups that allow anonymous sending and receiving of messages without revealing either who is sending or who is receiving.

Everything wiped every few minutes on the relay node.

Others would also run relays that are then federated together.

[–] SolarPunker@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

ActivityPub isn't good for everything, especially for privacy. Luckily SimpleX exists.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Thanks, never heard of SimpleX, but I will check it out.

But to make an analogy. Bitcoin wasn't good for privacy at first. But they added features and new coins like Monero were developed with strong privacy.

So I expect there will eventually be a private ActivityPub, either "on top of" or "next to" the current one.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 week ago

i mean sure, you can modify the standard enough until it's somewhat secure, but it doesn't make any sense to do so.

You actively don't want secure communication channels to be interoperable with insecure ones, they should be kept as separate as possible so there's minimal risk of leaking the important data.

[–] absentrevision@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

+1 for simplex

https://simplex.chat/

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev -1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

How would simplex even help here? Is the a Lemmy alternative built upon simplex? Or a friendica one?

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

not sure how this is confusing, simplex is a chat app with privacy as the #1 priority; OP wanted a private alternative to whatsapp, simplex is that alternative.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

I missed the thing about the chat app 😅 My bad.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] Cheradenine@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago

SimpleX can be self hosted

[–] fxomt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As in, activitypub is not suited for chatting apps. A decentralized protocol specifically designed for messaging (matrix,xmpp,simplex) would fit better here.

[–] onlinepersona@programming.dev 1 points 1 week ago

I missed the thing about the chat app 😅 My bad.

Anti Commercial-AI license

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

It doesn’t cover everything you’re referring to, but there are projects like

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secure_Scuttlebutt

So there is certainly a way forward for what you’re describing

[–] yessikg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

XMPP would work for this