this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
139 points (98.6% liked)

Games

37192 readers
1040 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here and here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Quoting someone from another site:

Some key things:

  1. The real world price must be displayed for the item, not just the currency (ie, an outfit should say $24 next to it, not just 2800 vbucks).

  2. Currencies must be exactly matchable to purchase amounts, so no 1000 point packages for 800 point items to leave 200 extra

It’s nice to see some government documents that genuinely understand how these currencies are being used in manipulative ways.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Aielman15@lemmy.world 18 points 1 week ago

Quite the big step for gaming rights in the EU. In the last page, the document also mentions "whales" as "vulnerable people", adding that a game targeting them specifically may run afoul of EU legislation when precaution are not taken to protect them from their impulses.

This may have a gigantic ripple effect in the industry -- or it may not, if the industry decides that targeting whales in the US and China is more profitable than bowing to the EU.

[–] HollowNaught@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

This is long overdue

EU taking some big strides rn

[–] kane@femboys.biz 5 points 1 week ago

Honestly that sounds amazing, and would help a lot of people to not over spend.

[–] arakhis_@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

finally.

literally why is anarchist NA not doing their jobs here... same with the apple/google offensive just a couple days ago people need to preassure from within, EU can only do so much

[–] imecth@fedia.io 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I guess guidelines are a decent start, the part that's gonna be tricky is getting the gaming industry to follow them.

[–] arakhis_@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

what's hard here, either you follow the rules or you get disabled in EU markets - your loss

[–] imecth@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The gaming industry is gonna fight this every step of the way. There's gonna be lobbying, kicking and screaming; and no it's certainly not as simple as "follow the rules or get banned". First off because you can't just ban games by flicking your fingers, there's thousands of games and dozens of distributing platforms. Secondly because the goal isn't to remove them from the market but to get them to play ball.

[–] arakhis_@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean they play ball when they are disabled until they comply with the law, no?

Similar to the loot case law change (belgium/netherlands iirc). Or was that handled differently?

[–] imecth@fedia.io 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you look at how the EU is handling the Digital Markets Act - it's gonna be fines.

[–] arakhis_@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

so lootboxes were never diabled?

Pretty sure I've heard users from these regions mention that they had their shops completely unavailable in certain games

But fines wouldnt be an issue here either to me, maybe Im missing something

[–] imecth@fedia.io -1 points 1 week ago

Pretty sure I've heard users from these regions mention that they had their shops completely unavailable in certain games

Those were local measures that were not handled by the European Union.

rare EU commission W