It's gotta be far more than just those.
There be a reason he won't get a security clearance
What is This Group is About?
De Quoi Parle ce Groupe?
The unofficial non-partisan Lemmy movement to bring proportional representation to all levels of government in Canada.
🗳️Voters deserve more choice and accountability from all politicians.
Le mouvement non officiel et non partisan de Lemmy visant à introduire la représentation proportionnelle à tous les niveaux de gouvernement au Canada.
🗳️Les électeurs méritent davantage de choix et de responsabilité de la part de tous les politiciens.
Related Communities/Communautés Associées
Resources/Ressources
Official Organizations/Organisations Officielles
We're looking for more moderators, especially those who are of French and indigenous identities.
Nous recherchons davantage de modérateurs, notamment ceux qui sont d'identité française et autochtone.
It's gotta be far more than just those.
There be a reason he won't get a security clearance
Yep, foreign "friends"
Koch is also a regular funder of Jordan Peterson, who just happens to taught P-boy and Musk to his fans.
"Shocking!", said no one at all....
Okay. Let me preface this by saying that I have no doubt at all that all of this about Poppinfresh is absolutely true.
He’s funded, aided, and helped by the same far-right cabal that worked to get Modhi, Trump, Meili and Meloni elected, and narrowly missed the Afd in Germany and Marine LePen in France. It is a global network of far right billionaires working at creating a autocracy of the rich.
But…but…but… and again, I stress that I absolutely think this particular example is true, so don’t crucify me…
When you throw that much shit into a chart, you can eventually find links between literally everything. There’s so much data on that chart I could probably link Poppinfresh to the Easter Bunny if I wanted to.
You make a fair point about connection mapping - with enough data points, you can create tenuous links between almost anything.
However, what matters isn't just the existence of connections but their nature, strength, and influence on policy. The concern isn't merely that Poilievre has connections (all politicians do), but rather the specific power dynamics these connections create in our democratic system.
Under our First-Past-the-Post system, a party can form a majority government with around 39% of the vote. This means corporate and wealthy interests only need to influence a relatively small portion of the electorate to gain 100% of governing power. This vulnerability is significantly reduced in proportional representation systems where coalition-building necessitates broader consensus.
The connection between corporate lobbying and our winner-take-all electoral system is precisely why many wealthy interests resist proportional representation - it dilutes their influence by making our democracy more resilient to capture.
Rather than focusing solely on Poilievre's connections, we should question why our electoral system makes it so profitable for special interests to influence so few decision-makers. A more proportional system would require influencing a much broader coalition.