this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2025
1746 points (99.0% liked)

News

28442 readers
4462 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Walmart fired Dani Davis, a 6'4" cisgender woman, after a man who mistook her for transgender verbally threatened her in a women’s restroom at a Florida store.

Davis, visibly shaken, reported the March 14 incident to her immediate supervisor but was fired for not informing salaried management, allegedly creating a “security risk.”

Davis called the firing discriminatory. After viral backlash, Walmart offered to reinstate her with back pay.

Davis, a longtime employee, is uncertain about returning, citing fears of a hostile work environment.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] callyral@pawb.social 71 points 6 days ago (2 children)

a man who mistook her for transgender verbally threatened her in a women’s restroom

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago

Self-righteousness and reasoning are often mutually exclusive

[–] Enfors@lemm.ee 2 points 6 days ago

I'm assuming he threatened her as she was going into or coming out of the restroom.

[–] chetradley@lemm.ee 35 points 6 days ago

When you're so committed to "protecting women's spaces" that you go into a women's restroom to harass a woman.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 48 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Why did Walmart fire her for being attacked? Isn't that one if the easiest wrongful termination lawsuits ever?

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Most people who are wrongfully terminated don't take it to court. It might now be remedied since the press jumped on it but the remedy usually involved rehiring which is probably not ideal at this point.

[–] psion1369@lemmy.world 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Walmart made sure they were specific about the reason being reporting to the wrong supervisor and creating a security risk. Can't call it wrong that way.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 4 points 6 days ago

She created the security risk, not the guy attacking her, riiiiiight?

[–] uberdroog@lemmy.world 43 points 6 days ago (1 children)

WTF. For not informing salaried management? GTFO. She has a job to do and your bullshit corporate structure is dumb. Its a management failure for adding complexity where there shouldnt be any. Instead of any 360 introspection, they took what they thought was the easy way out. Salaried employee? Yeah, where was the manager when all this was happening? Great question. Not a brain cell fired, no pause at sanctioning harassment of employees. Walmart can suck it. Cheap disposable shit anyway. Leaches created the environment that requires their teet. Do all you can to shop direct and local.

[–] dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

For a while now I've been paying attention to the way customers are treated, and noticed a kind of symmetry with how the employees of a given business/institution are treated. If you're seeing one kind of abuse/neglect, the other is very likely to also be the case, because it all comes from the same place.

In the case of Walmart: employees under a rather heavy yoke of part-time-no-benefits-never-unions labor, and customers are given a dis-compassionate choice between poorly made and barely viable goods from dubious origins. It's not that management/ownership doesn't care about this or that, it's that they generally don't care about people and are grotesque about it. It's all here.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 40 points 6 days ago (1 children)

How the fuck can you reprimand someone for not reporting an incident properly when they report it to their supervisor? The supervisor's responsibility at that point is to either inform the employee of the proper way to report it or report it on their behalf. If the report doesn't come through properly then the supervisor has failed to fulfill their duties, not the other employee.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 18 points 6 days ago (1 children)

They know all this. They didn't fire her out of ignorance.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago

Why retaliate at all though?

[–] HighFructoseLowStand@lemm.ee 41 points 6 days ago (1 children)

In his dissent in Plessy v. Ferguson, John Marshall Harlan cited one of his objections to Louisiana's public transit segregation law as being that it effectively left the execution of policy to railroad porters. Homer Plessy was a light-skinned Creole man whose family was free before the Civil War. He would have enjoyed roughly equal rights to Whites up until the first generation of Jim Crow laws in the 1870s. Harlan pointed out that the criteria for "White" and "Black" for the purposes of segregation was not solid, just being whoever was in charge of the segregated facilities looking at them and determining what they are.

There is nothing new under the Sun.

[–] jwmgregory@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago

history doesn’t repeat but it sure does rhyme, as once said

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I would boycott Walmart but I already started boycotting them over a decade ago. I understand some people in tight financial situations need the lower prices they can get from places like Walmart. And therefore they cannot so freely boycott such a place but if you're somebody who can avoid it I would advise steering clear of that shit hole. Their policies are trash and the family that owns it are oligarchical douche bags.

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

This falls under "suffer on my own terms" for me. I won't go to Walmart, so we're going without extras. There's no cheese in my house right now because none was on sale at my local grocery store. So instead of going to Walmart, or paying $4 for a block of Cabot cheddar at my grocer, the choice is go without cheese for the time being.

Used to shop minimally at Walmart anyway, now I refuse to go. I go to my local co-op 2ce a week now though.

Bulk spices are cheap y'all.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 29 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Walmart should have "fired" that customer, ie trespass him. WTF was this goon doing in the women's restroom anyway?

[–] RowRowRowYourBot@sh.itjust.works 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Is that trespassing? I would think it qualifies as a sex crime since a man followed someone into the woman’s bathroom.

[–] swelter_spark@reddthat.com 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

"Trespassing" someone, in a Walmart context, means the person is banned from a store and if they return they will legally be trespassing and may be arrested.

[–] veni_vedi_veni@lemmy.world 9 points 6 days ago

Asking the real question

Zero surprise Walmart did the wrong thing

[–] WickedPissah@lemm.ee 12 points 6 days ago

This is our world now…please remember Inclusion Day April 30!🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍🌈

[–] Kalysta@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago

Fuck walmart and double fuck Florida.

I hope this poor girl can flee the state. Does she have a gofundme to help with moving expenses?

load more comments
view more: next ›