this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
10 points (100.0% liked)

Work Reform

9976 readers
4 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nimbledaemon@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

If you work 40 hours a week, you should be able to afford a good life, full stop.

[–] vercimusart@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Same way minimum wage means “we’d pay you less if we could”

[–] seeCseas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"this is the aboslutely minimum we can get away with".

[–] cedarmesa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] dmmeyournudes@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

its more like, if people would stop settling for wages below what you need to survive, then businesses wouldn't be able to function without paying a living wage. but there is always someone willing to do the work for less so they get away with it. imagine a world where restaurants and farms were forced to employ fully waged employees, the entire country would cease to function.

[–] noita@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This assumes that there's an infinite supply of well paying jobs that are freely accessible to everyone, but that's not how reality works. If the options are "work for shit pay" or "don't work at all and starve" then people will choose the shit job. It's why market economies aim for a few percents unemployment(and why places like the US really don't want to forgive student debt) because people need to be desperate for whatever job they can get to keep wages low.

A much better way to solve it is just to legislate that if you work a fulltime job you have to be paid a livable wage.

[–] darkwing_duck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So in essence you just want to ban employers from being able to offer poverty wages.

Doesn't that mean even more people would be out of a job as the jobs paying poverty wages disappear? They won't pay more, they're way more likely to close up shop.