this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2023
255 points (90.5% liked)

politics

19126 readers
2393 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] protist@mander.xyz 84 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Hot take here, judging by the company, but I think Biden's doing great. He's moved the federal government in a more progressive direction than any presidential administration since Lyndon Johnson, and I'm confident with more Democrats in the legislature he could do even more.

Simultaneously, the opposition has become so dangerous that it's absolutely critical the Democratic coalition remain together. There are always going to be criticisms you can level against any leader. I certainly don't agree with Biden 100% of the time. But if you check out the other hot takes here, making Biden out to be the devil, or saying they'll never vote for him...those people are trying to elect Donald Trump again.

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Biden is definitely doing much better than I expected. No question. Nowhere near the Bernie Sanders type that we need, but a pleasant surprise.

In another time, I probably would go on a rant about Boomer politics killing us slowly. But since Republicans have literally become fascist lunatics, Democrats have to stick together no matter what.

History has shown us just how bad things can get under fascism, and these Republicans are dangerous, stupid, and cruel, and stupid. And yes, I know I put stupid twice.

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In another time, I probably would go on a rant about Boomer politics killing us slowly. But since Republicans have literally become fascist lunatics, Democrats have to stick together no matter what.

God, isn't that the truth. If you told me in 2012 that Mitt fucking Romney, theocrat and corpo cocksucker extraordinaire, was going to be one of the least fascist members of the GOP in 10 years, I would have laughed in your face.

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Or that we'd be happy with Liz Cheney?!

For real - coming to the realization that Liz was basically the only adult in the room that is the GOP who was willing to take any semblance of a leadership position staunchly against, you know, conducting a fucking coup was a bit of a shock for me.

[–] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have no problem with democrats 'sticking together' as far as voting blue next election, but don't sit back after you've done that.

The seeds for fascism in the USA are the same ones that were in Germany when Hitler rose - rampant inequality and poverty leading to desperate people leading to christian nationalism, and later fascism. I hate to break it to you but a Democratic party with no one to the left of them has no incentive to fix the root problems, and every incentive to stay on the take and then escape to their favorite country with their wealth if they push it too far.

Campaign finance reform, election reform, labor reform ... pick a cause and find some friends. We cannot have a democracy without working for it. Fascism will rise in the absence of effort.

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

What we need is a left-wing candidate to win a primary, and pull the party to the left the way Bush and Trump pulled their party to the alt-right

[–] SlikPikker@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

I'm just impressed he didn't crack down on the left first thing.

Not snark here, I had worried he would.

[–] takeda@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

It's the #walkaway all over again, which really was conservatives saying that they won't vote for democrats "again".

[–] PugJesus@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know if I'd say great, but he was considerably less disappointing than I'd feared.

Ultimately, we need an overhaul rather than incremental change - but bet your ass I'm voting Dem for every Federal office come 2024, Biden included. The overhaul the fascists promise, after all, is not one that can be reversed.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

but bet your ass I'm voting Dem for every Federal office come 2024, Biden included.

And just a reminder, why don't we all get warmed up voting in our local elections in 2023.

[–] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

I have to admit, I was definitively in the “they’re really gonna make me vote for Joe Biden?” Camp, but I’ve been pleasantly surprised. His work with the railroad union really solidified it, where sure, don’t love the strike breaking, but the post-strike negotiations end results was certainly a win for those same rail workers.

[–] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

Man I'm so fully employed that I have three part time jobs. All of which I need to pay rent. Pretty sweet!

No I do not have health insurance.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (12 children)

The goal should be zero employment. Making people work to justify their existence is the antithesis of what we've fought and suffered for a hundred thousand years to achieve.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/promise/1575/increase-federal-minimum-wage-15hour/

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/promise/1541/increase-access-affordable-housing/

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/promise/1584/end-pay-discrimination/

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/promise/1552/provide-section-8-vouchers-low-income-families-cap/

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/promise/1583/offer-8000-tax-credit-child-care/

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/promise/1602/guarantee-12-weeks-paid-family-and-medical-leave/

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/promise/1601/make-2-years-community-college-or-high-quality-tra/

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/promise/1596/make-public-colleges-and-universities-tuition-free/

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/promise/1588/no-tax-increase-anyone-making-less-400000/

certain industries are also paying less than when Biden first took office and costs for everything has gone up sometimes doubling

Walmart is just one example paying $4 less or more than a few years ago

why should this be celebrated? links below are what we are celebrating the ones above stalled out

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/promise/1581/give-small-businesses-restart-package-pandemic-rel/

https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/biden-promise-tracker/promise/1577/help-state-and-local-governments-prevent-budget-sh/

[–] scottywh@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Full employment" is a lie...

[–] Techmaster@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe they used speech recognition. They meant fool.

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 12 points 1 year ago

It's not helping me or anyone I know, so...

[–] Rice_Daddy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

This was a well balanced article overall, considering the title. It does celebrate the low unemployment but balances it out by calling out cost related issues. Left leaning but not delusional.

Don't believe your eyes and ears! You're doing well! You're all doing so well

[–] snipvoid@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Plus think of all the EXTRA jobs building the border wall will bring!

load more comments
view more: next ›