this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
30 points (87.5% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 59 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The article helpfully never spells out the acronym. Environmental Social & Governance

[–] taladar@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you sure? There is 58 other definitions for that three letter acronym, just like there are for most others.

https://www.acronymfinder.com/ESG.html

Environmentally Sustainable Growth

Essential Surfing Gear

Electroslag Welding

are probably also things not very well understood by most Brits.

[–] HerbalGamer@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

Electroslag Welding

them slags

[–] thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It was actually defined in the last sentence of the article

"Some Β£448m was pulled by retail investors from environment, social and governance (ESG) funds in August"

But I scrolled the article 3 times before I spotted it, so your point stands.

[–] tal@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I'm thinking that this is some sort of joke article at City AM, because it's always convention to define an acronym at first use, and they didn't just omit it -- like, it probably wasn't just an editorial error -- but put it in at the very end of the article.

[–] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 year ago
[–] bedrooms@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

And I have no idea what that means after reading it

[–] jaelisp@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's understandable because I have to explain it every single time (already explained it to my mother about 4 times now). Whereas believing in aliens is actually quite reasonable (just not that they are here and spend their time making crop circles and probing trailer trash).

[–] taladar@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wish more people made that distinction. Believing that there is a whole universe and Earth is the only planet to develop life is quite unreasonable without strong evidence for it but so is the idea that aliens would cross the interstellar distances just to make crop circles or probe random farmers.

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

are you kidding. human farmers are known for their ass cracks. Always showing them off while working on tractors or doing plumbing. Well except for those prudish overalls types. I mean how are the aliens going to resist that.

Maybe late-70s New York punk-funk just isn’t that big in the UK these days