I've been outbid for a few apartments in St Kilda. I just want a shitty studio to call my own AND live in, I'm not reaching for the moon here. But the return for airBnB is better than renting them so investors have more money to outbid me. Now the bottom price for the area is beyond my means. Maybe I should just start squatting in AirBNBs until they send the jacks round to boot me out.
this post was submitted on 13 Apr 2025
44 points (92.3% liked)
Australia
4097 readers
59 users here now
A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.
Before you post:
If you're posting anything related to:
- The Environment, post it to Aussie Environment
- Politics, post it to Australian Politics
- World News/Events, post it to World News
- A question to Australians (from outside) post it to Ask an Australian
If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:
- When posting news articles use the source headline and place your commentary in a separate comment
Banner Photo
Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Australian Politics
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
- Aussie Memes
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
Moderation
Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.
Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
In Western Australia you need council approval now or airbnb won't list you.
Councils can manage approvals to mitigate this type of problem.
Its great in theory only while councils have money to do enforcement and surveillance.
Nah so you need council approval. When you get approved you get a code number. You give the code number to AirBnB who looks it up to confirm it hasn't been cancelled by the council. If you don't have a code you don't get listed.
The council doesn't have to do surveillance and enforcement because owners need to apply.
The requirements are fairly strict. For example, a single apartment in a block of apartments can't get approved. The entire block of apartments needs to be approved as holiday accommodation, and they're not going to do that for a block of apartments where locals are living. In my city it's only places that have been constructed with the intention of being holiday resorts.
Standalone houses are a different story. You do need to notify neighbours and give them an opportunity to object. There needs to be adequate parking et cetera. You need a formal management plan to mitigate anti-social behavior and what have you.
Suffice to say it's heavily regulated and local residents have a mechanism by which to manage problematic listings.
I've family in Amsterdam, they're only allowed to Airbnb places for a maximum of 45 days per year.
Presumably that would depend on the type of property. Like hotels list their rooms on AirBnB, and it wouldn't make any sense to limit those. If you're listing your own apartment or home then a days-per-year limit makes more sense.
It's easy to pick those locks too ...
Ha. Loved the sneaky plug for his Senate campaign in the background of the video.
They stopped using them on construction sites specifically for that reason. You can just cut them off (or knock them off the wall), and open them at your leisure. Everyone hides the keys instead now.
Also, its just a stupid solution for AirBNB too, since anyone can easily clone the keys. You're better off installing a lock that accepts pin numbers and you can change whenever a guest leaves
You can just cut them off (or knock them off the wall), and open them at your leisure.
When it comes down to it, there's usually a brute-force way through most standard locks, say, bolt cutters, pin raking (or bumping), unscrewing the door hinges if they're on the wrong side. But in populated areas, a loud break-in isn't ideal, especially for squatters who plan on sleeping overnight. So for all intents and purposes, I'd assume the point of the lock is just to make it not worth a basic squatter or thief's time and tempt them to search elsewhere for an easy win.
Everyone hides the keys instead now.
I'm curious - if you went to a new construction site, do you reckon you could find their key/s within an hour or two without already knowing where they were?
Everyone uses them because usability is dramatically more important than security.
The key is only in the box for a few hours between guests, and during that time the cleaner will be there.
Even if someone picked the lock or cloned a key... all they can steal is some shitty ikea furniture and maybe make an instant coffee.
The point is you can have both security and usability
If the guest loses the key too, it's not an issue
I suspect people mainly use the lockboxes only because other people do
We have an apartment in a holiday village. We couldn't rent to long term tenants if we wanted to.
We have a fancy electronic lock. The codes update automatically to the last 4 digits of a guest's phone number.
It was expensive. $1,200 or something.
You need to change the batteries. Not every week, but maybe once every few months.
Guest's struggle with it. We literally send a diagram with step by step instructions for how to operate it but guests still struggle.
Occasionally guests call us because they can't find the key-safe. "I'm looking at a key safe but I think it's for the neighbours apartment and it doesn't look like your diagram and my code doesn't work".
We had another version of the same thing previously which was terrible. The number pad kept dropping the connection to the lock and it was just a shit show.
On balance, I do like this fandangle new lock and I do like that we don't have to change the codes and that guests only have access for the duration of their stay. There is definitely a reduction in usability, although we've been able to mitigate that. I don't regret getting it but there's definitely something to be said for these cheap usable boxes.
I suspect people mainly use the lockboxes only because other people do
I suspect it's a cheap and easy hack, I don't work with locks but I assume they don't need to 𝙿̝̃𝙰̤͙̑̇𝚈̲̠̤̪͒̉͐͑ ̲͇̳̺͈̽͌̇̓̄ ̟̝̹̞̩͔̼̀͂̓͑͒ͦ̓𝙼̞̹̩͎̣̥͇̟̒̊͂̽̇͗̓͌͊ͅ𝙾͚̲͎̰͔̖̼̐͑͒̀́ͩ̚𝙽͇͍̖̖̙ͮ̓̎ͤ̿𝙴̪̺̜̱̅̋̆̊𝚈̯̘̇̚ to install a whole new locking system on the door itself, just change the lock cylinder and put the new key in a cheap box.
Even if someone picked the lock or cloned a key… all they can steal is some shitty ikea furniture and maybe make an instant coffee.
Well, they could also sabotage the AirBnB if they wanted to devalue the property, or they could steal from a tenant who isn't home.
If a tenant isn't home they will have the key with them, it won't be in the box.
Sabotage would be covered by insurance. It wouldn't de-value the property. Who would actually do that? Huge personal risk for a vague improbable social benefit.
If you wanted to sabotage surely a molotov through the window would be more effective.
If a tenant isn’t home they will have the key with them, it won’t be in the box.
I was thinking about if a key was taken when it was there, then the attacker leaves to have a duplicate key cut, returns it (to prevent suspicion and the lock being replaced) and infiltrates with it whenever they want.
insurance
I don't know how that kind of property insurance works, but surely there are limits to what is covered? Plus, as another motive, it might just be out of spite, rather than to devalue property.
If you wanted to sabotage surely a molotov through the window would be more effective.
Yes, but there's surely a larger chance of needlessly getting on the federal shitlist for firebombing.
If these things ever happened no one would use those boxes.
Stealing from guests would still be high risk / low yield. I doubt people are leaving cash and jewellery in their apartment when they go out for lunch. If you want to engage in a life of petty crime I'm sure there are more rewarding ways.
There isn't really a limit to what's covered by insurance. That's kind of the idea of having insurance. Low-cost damage isn't covered, but if you started a campaign of petty vandalism the owner would address the security deficiency.
Man that is some bad subtitling. TL;DW? Is it just a worse version of lock picking lawyer? I guess it isn’t a great idea to secure your property with a $40 Bunnings lock if so. Still surprising that one of those common locks can be defeated by a metal shim. I lost the key to a small lockbox I bought from Bunnings and “picked” the lock with the thin end of a zip tie. Criminals must love Bunnings based security.
Purplepingers is an anti-landlord activist currently running for the Australian Senate with the Victorian Socialists party: https://pingers4parliament.com/
He's previously done a lot of 'naming and shaming' of landlords (https://www.shitrentals.org/) and compiled lists of unused properties that people could squat in.
Reading between the lines, this video is encouraging people to fuck with properties rented out through Airbnb, or at least trying to mess with the heads of the 'hosts'.
Reading between the lines, this video is encouraging people to fuck with properties rented out through Airbnb, or at least trying to mess with the heads of the ‘hosts’.
I liked the comment under the video ~~suggesting~~ warning against the much easier method of sticking a bit of super glue in the mechanism.
Nice, I’ll have to check out that site. As much as I wouldn’t want people fucking with airbnbs. Especially not in way the videos comments mention, no sir.
Shitrentals breaks on mobile typed out a whole reply and it fuckin doesn’t let you scroll to post it
Def consider telling them somehow, might be happening to other people too.
0/10, didn't recommend an equally-weak lock at the end and call it "unbreakable, apparently, from what I've heard"