this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
187 points (99.0% liked)

DeGoogle Yourself

11219 readers
256 users here now

A community for those that would like to get away from Google.

Here you may post anything related to DeGoogling, why we should do it or good software alternatives!

Rules

  1. Be respectful even in disagreement

  2. No advertising unless it is very relevent and justified. Do not do this excessively.

  3. No low value posts / memes. We or you need to learn, or discuss something.

Related communities

!privacyguides@lemmy.one !privacy@lemmy.ml !privatelife@lemmy.ml !linuxphones@lemmy.ml !fossdroid@social.fossware.space !fdroid@lemmy.ml

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For several years I've been using DuckDuckGo instead of Google Search, and I've been overall quite happy with the results. Only rarely had I to resort to Google search (!g).

During the last month or two, however, I've found myself using the !g switch and Google search more than half of the time. DuckDuckGo shows no or few results where Google shows more (and useful) ones.

Still I don't want to give in. So:

  • Have you also experienced this worsening of DuckDuckGo?
  • Which other more privacy-respecting alternatives do you recommend?
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 11 points 12 hours ago

At some point, DuckDuckGo stop handling boolean logic properly in search terms. I've been using it for more than a decade, and the quality has definitely gotten worse over the last few years

[–] Wimster@europe.pub 9 points 12 hours ago

I use Qwant instead and I'm pretty happy wiith that.

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 11 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

There's only a handful of companies out there actually spidering. A lot of third party offerings are just re-scraping the existing spiders. I wouldn't be surprised if deficiencies in quality were cat and mouse games between google/bing/et all and DuckDuckGo.

I've been self-hosting SearXNG. It's fantastic for everything except local hits, business hours, stuff where Google maps data is being referenced.

I think the problem with free search is that somebody needs to pay for it. There's more people block both ads and anonymize themselves, the more free options will eventually wither.

And while I'm perfectly willing to pay for ad-free anonymity, capitalism dictates that all services need to have exponential growth or fail, and eventually all that data can just be sold or otherwise make it into the wrong hands.

I'm kind of hoping that at some point you can purchase distilled search content in a locally hostable AI model. It could post ad free and complete anonymous access, and you just need to pay for updates to the search model.

[–] dbtng@eviltoast.org 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Right on. I'm running searxng and whoogle. Whoogle is a low resource option, and it only sources Google. I like searxng for the deep results, all kinds of weird stuff pops.

I was recently recommended to check out YaCy. Haven't done it yet.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago

I've been using SearXNG during the last day and I'm quite impressed too so far!

True what you say about the problems behind net search. It's actually a very complex problem. In my opinion part of the problem is that there's a lot (most?) of rubbish out there. It's like a library with useful books of different genres all mixed together, and mixed with an even larger amount of nonsense books. Maybe a solution would be something completely different from indexing – but I have no idea what.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 4 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

I haven't used DDG in years. I've been using Start Page and its fit all my needs (its basically old google before enshitification).

I've played with searxng which seems promising but I haven't given it enough time. But it seems like I might eventually move there.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Tried Startpage a while ago, but was put off but some alleged iffy dealings of the company behind it. Trying SearXNG now and I'm impressed!

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

What iffy dealings are you referring to? Because they were acquired? They've been established, and restablished after being acquired, as being completely privacy focused.

My only criticism is that they don't always play nice with VPNs.

But yes, SearXNG is a great way to go too.

[–] theblips@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I switched to Kagi and am beyond satisfied. If your goal is to strictly degoogle, it fits the bill, but it still does if you are looking for better privacy, as it now comes with an implementation of Privacy Pass. The algorithm is leagues above Google's and DDGs, IMO, and the "lens" feature allows you to seamlessly filter the results to specialized sources, including the Fediverse. "Small web" is a fun feature for when you're bored running unit tests at work, too

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I tried Kagi for a while, but it was giving me less useful results than DDG, so I simply left it. I think it depends a lot on what kinds of searches one does, and Kagi is more useful for other users.

[–] theblips@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

AFAIK the algorithm for Kagi is really alien compared to Google and Bing/DDG, so the results do look a little weird at first, the main difference being just the sheer reduction in quantity of results.
But I guess if you didn't like it, you didn't. Maybe it is worse and I'm biased because I already paid

[–] theblips@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Forgot to mention that it unfortunately is a US-owned company, so it would be off the table for the full-on US boycott crowd, especially because it's a paid service.
Though they seem to be a genuinely good company that consistenly provides good customer support and improves the product in tangible ways. Privacy Pass was implemented because of customer feedback, for example, and so were crypto payments, and both were publicly discussed on the forums with good transparency. They also actively promote the decentralization of the internet: with that Small Web feature I mentioned, with Fediverse and Usenet Archives search being implemented by default, by providing an interface to use any LLM model through their assistant... So I wouldn't want to boycott them, and I don't

[–] monovergent@lemmy.ml 8 points 23 hours ago

Maybe I search for weird things, but my major gripe with DDG is that its autocorrect is way too aggressive. But SearXNG public instances work for me 99% of the time.

[–] BeyondRuby@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I have thought the same thing after about three years or so of using DDG, I've been using Qwant as of late and seem to get much better results

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'll give Qwant too a try, cheers! Testing SearXNG for a couple of days first.

[–] BeyondRuby@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago

I wish you luck with SearXNG, I don't know if I used the wrong instances or what but I didn't find the results i got that great. However that is the reason people say you should host you own instance. Hopefully it works out I really enjoy the idea of hosting my own instance

[–] unsettlinglymoist@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Same, I was a DDG user for years and switched to Qwant a month ago. Qwant results are a step up from DDG, and Qwant takes the same approach to privacy as DDG but it's based in France so it wins in that regard as well. I'm in the US and Qwant still does a great job of providing localized results.

[–] arakhis_@feddit.org 13 points 1 day ago
[–] corgi@lemmy.world 6 points 23 hours ago

Been happy with Kagi for the past few months. So far no thoughts of switching back to either Google or DDG.

[–] fabio@lemmy.manganiello.tech 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You can find a good Searxng instance or run your own (it can also run on a RPi)

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

This.

I'm using perennialte.ch, they redirect reddit urls to redlib which is a nice touch.

I went ddg > kagi > searxng and this is the set up I'm happiest with.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

Nice initiative besides the search service! Thanks for sharing.

[–] ZeroCool@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

I haven't noticed any issues with the quality of DDG results, but if you feel the results are lackluster, you could try a metasearch engine like SearXNG. You can self-host it or use one of the many public instances maintained by the community. The main advantage, apart from the privacy focused aspect of the project, is that you can pull results from multiple search engines with a single query. It's highly customizable too. You can configure it exactly how you want.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago

Trying it these past days and I'm impressed!

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And for anyone who doesn't know: SearX is pronounced "Search", and it's successor, SearXNG, is pronounced "Searching".

(In many languages "x" signals a "ch" sound)

Note: But maybe don't go around saying "Have you Searching'd it yet?"

[–] scheep@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I like SearXNG, you get all of all worlds

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I've noticed this is the case but not that it's declining. I haven't used it that long.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

Admittedly it could be a temporary fluctuation of some kind.

[–] hellfire103@lemmy.ca 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

For you, I would recommend the following:

I use SearXNG, which I self-host.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PalmTreeIsBestTree@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I use StartPage because it’s the closest to Google 10+ years ago.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

True about the good old-Google feeling! I want to find how much about of the shadiness claims about Startpage have been substantiated or denied.

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)
  • Have you also experienced this worsening of DuckDuckGo?

Yes.

  • Which other more privacy-respecting alternatives do you recommend?

I'm in the same boat. I'll be trying out these answers.

[–] flango 6 points 1 day ago
[–] K0W4LSK1@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago

Really funny about page 😂 Cool that they share the git code!

[–] MantisToboggon@lazysoci.al 2 points 19 hours ago

How is it for porn?

[–] guest@feddit.org 38 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I like qwant.com from France. They are using the Bing index but started to collaborate with Ecosia to build their own.

[–] _LordMcNuggets_@feddit.org 1 points 12 hours ago

+1, Qwant is awesome

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RoachFire@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I run my own instance of SearX. Very reliable.

[–] dogma11@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Just setup my own instance! Happy so far!

[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I have been very happy with Kagi. I think that it is worth the money. I did quit it though, in line with the US boycott, so now i am on Quant.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Dengalicious@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 day ago

The main problem for me is how much DuckDuckGo priorities recency in the results over relevancy

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Duckduckgo gives you Bing results. If you like Microsoft they are up the alley. If not tough luck.

DDG is often but not always a lot worse than Google in my experience.

[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I didn't know about this – that may explain the problem.

[–] UltraMasculine@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

DuckDuckGo/Bing is pretty bad at finding stuff in my native language. That's why I use Startpage (and sometimes even Google) more nowadays.

[–] Commiunism@beehaw.org 7 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Searx is good enough if you set up plenty of engines - I do look up quite a lot of stuff and not once in the past 3 months did I go "yeah I need to use google for this".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] haverholm@kbin.earth 15 points 1 day ago

I've definitely felt the enshittification of DDG. A couple of years ago they would start dropping hits related to my location into my search results, even when I had region off and private search by default. That gave me the impression that my IP address was being used and possibly passed on to Bing, but I don't have the chops to confirm it 🤷

[–] RedSnt@feddit.dk 7 points 1 day ago

I mostly use startpage, but occasionally ecosia and mojeek.

load more comments
view more: next ›