this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2025
313 points (98.2% liked)

News

28823 readers
4863 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

More than 50 people stood outside the Enoch Pratt Library’s Southeast Anchor branch on a recent spring morning in Baltimore. Parents with small children, teenagers, and senior citizens clustered outside the door and waited to hear their ticket numbers called.

They weren’t there for books—at least, not at that moment. They came to shop for groceries.

Connected to the library, the brightly painted market space is small but doesn’t feel cramped. Massive windows drench it in sunshine. In a previous life, it was a café. Now, shelves, tables, counters, and a refrigerator are spread out across the room, holding a mix of produce and shelf-stable goods.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 98 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Conservatives would say this is communism and bad, which is why we should kill and eat conservatives.

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 38 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't want brain worms from eating unvaccinated Republicans.

[–] Cargon@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

In practical terms, you feed them to pigs and butcher the pigs. The pigs act as a filter.

[–] Not_Dav3@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

What if I don't want to eat a cop ? 🤨

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yeah prion diseases are fucking horrifying when you actually look into the details.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 15 points 6 days ago (5 children)

According to the article, this thing is entirely funded by private donations. Apart from the most reactionary right wing edgelords, I've yet to see any conservatives argue against charity. Most just don't want to be FORCED to pay for others via increased taxes, but they're happy to give when it's voluntary.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I've yet to see any conservatives argue against charity.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/01/20/freeze-winter-storm-midwest-cold-deaths-homeless/72269446007/

They absolutely argue against charity if said charity benefits those they don't like.

[–] MacNCheezus@lemmy.today 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, that sounds shitty, but what the article doesn't mention, despite being literally in the first paragraph of the press release that was linked, is that the real problem wasn't the zoning law violation, but the fact that the police department had received multiple calls for various crimes being committed there, including theft, harassment, drug overdose, and sexual assault. It also mentions various fire code violations involving the electrical supply, people cooking in non-ventilated rooms, etc.

It appears that the use of zoning laws violation to put an end to it was just a convenient excuse, but the author "forgot" to mention that in order to paint the city government in a bad light.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (6 children)

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/colorado/news/rock-church-lawsuit-colorado-free-exercise-religion-burdened-castle-rock-homeless/

Here's another one. There are cases of places banning charity all over the place. Hell, you can't give out bottles of water to people stuck in line outside in Georgia if they happen to be voting. They cut social programs and claim churches/charities will pick up the slack, and then attack said churches/charities.

My point is here that conservatives will simply attack anything they feel is in their way. They simply want control. They want homeless people to be homeless because "they deserve to be homeless". They have absolutely no problem attacking charitable efforts, even if it has no impact on them whatsoever. They want to maintain the social hierarchy they feel should be in place.

[–] turnip@sh.itjust.works 0 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Hayek just hated homeless people?

Have you read any of his books or delved into that side seriously at all, or is this a hunch?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] EightBitBlood@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

You're "forced" to pay taxes for the stability it provides the entire community.

Here's a great study on what causes crime:

https://sentencing.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/sentencingnvgov/content/Meetings/2022/08.24.22%20NSC%20Mtg.%20Agenda%20Item%208%20PFJ%20What%20Really%20Lowers%20Crime.pdf

Overwhelmingly most crime and violence in a community is related to the ability it's people have to earn income, housing, and healthcare. The very things our taxes are supposed to provide a security net for.

The taxes "forced" on you, to a point, are necessary for the stability of our communities. And the reason that stability is fading in most American cities isn't becuase of illegals, it's because of conservatives lowering and diverting tax revenues away from the social programs necessary to minimize crime. (Because those programs are "socialism.") Also conservatives fighting to never raise the minimum wage for a generation of Americans. What are the conservative policies on housing again? Oh yeah, people now have to compete with corporations to get them, so prices will never lower.

People are generally happy to pay taxes towards social safety nets when they understand the basic economics of the security it provides. Especially when there is a scientifically proven increase in violence and crime that comes from the erosion of that security.

If you feel "forced" to provide basic economic security to other Americans for the benefit of your entire community, and it's safety - then you don't have to look far to find a conservative who is against charity. Just look in a mirror.

We’ve been saying this for many years. It seems we have fostered a society that isn’t really interested in victim reduction as it is in vengeance. Only have to look at some of the countries with low recidivism rates.

[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (19 children)

I've always found that logic weird on their part.

If I am planning to do it anyway, because I recognize it is the right thing to do, what difference does it make if there are laws in place to ensure the less ethical among us do it as well?

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 5 points 6 days ago (11 children)

Conservatives have no real value system beyond "what is good for me right now?". They like or dislike things for transient, emotional, reasons. They might be in favor of charity when it's doing something they personally benefit from, but that's about as far as their reasoning goes.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] squid_slime@lemm.ee 1 points 4 days ago

I'm calling bs

[–] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Food should all be free.

We make more than twice the food we consume just to throw it away.

But starvation is profitable.

[–] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

All artificial scarcity is profitable, that’s why access is limited and sold.

load more comments
view more: next ›