this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
892 points (99.4% liked)

politics

22913 readers
3893 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Top Trump official Stephen Miller's recent declaration that anyone who "preaches hate for America" will face deportation has ignited alarm online, with critics warning the statement disregards First Amendment protections.

Social media users and legal analysts raised immediate concerns, pointing out that expressing dissent or criticism of the government is protected under the First Amendment. Some worried the administration was veering into authoritarian territory.

The backlash has reignited broader debates over the limits of free speech, especially as civil liberties fall under scrutiny. While immigration enforcement remains a core theme of President Donald Trump's platform, critics are increasingly questioning whether rhetoric like Miller's is a precursor to more aggressive suppression of dissent.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 1 points 10 minutes ago

Wow, what a dumb thing to claim when you have surrounded yourself with “free speech absolutists”. They are going to lose it on him, right? …. Right?

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

He means anyone who doesn't kiss his ass.

[–] TON618@lemmy.world 5 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

If America wants people to stop hating, maybe instead of trying to wipe it's ass with the first amendment, it should stop cultivating hate with it's actions.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 minutes ago

If America wants people to stop hating

What makes you think that is on the agenda? Hate is their specialty. A divided people are no threat to the oligarchy. Hate for breakfast, lunch and dinner.

[–] SwordandArt@lemmy.world 2 points 49 minutes ago

Hate has been actively cultivated online through various psyop campaigns over the years. It may have started offline but it skyrocketed with the growth of the internet to specifically destabilize the US.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 4 points 1 hour ago

Kapo Stephen "PeeWee Himmler" Miller.

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 4 points 1 hour ago

This walking penis needs to be catapulted into the sun.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago

This reminds me, i have to sharpen my guillotine.

[–] Liberteez@lemm.ee 11 points 7 hours ago

Free means all.

Rise, or fall.

[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 7 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

CANADA. Take note!! Get out and vote!!

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I'm gonna laugh so hard if the polls are correct (Canada has less of an issue here) and Trump causes Pierre Populism to go from a majority to a minority. I'm still voting and I am encouraging everyone I know to as well.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 1 points 14 minutes ago

The polls suggest a Liberal majority and PP might lose his seat.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 10 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

If they destroy the first, use the second. That's why it was ratified!

[–] Snowclone@lemmy.world 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

It wasn't. At all. And you can clearly see armed people aren't lining up to stop a clearly lawless authoritarian tyrant from holding power over them.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 hour ago

This all just got started. People are still hoping something changes before they have to commit murder. By next summer, the attitude will be different.

[–] Liberteez@lemm.ee 5 points 7 hours ago

Free means all.

Rise, or fall.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"Veering into authoritarian territory"?! They set course for that the moment he was sworn in and floored it, have you not been paying attention?!

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 hour ago

Since before even lol

[–] opus86@lemmy.today 4 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

After all the stuff Stephen Miller pulled during Trumps first term, I can't believe no one made sure he couldn't do it again. Apparently, I'm an idiot for thinking someone would hold him accountable.

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Could you remind us all the stuff he pulled?

[–] Prethoryn@lemmy.world 22 points 10 hours ago

Some worried the administration was veering into an authoritarian territory.

Yeah no fucking shit. It has been happening since he got into office you fucking dipshits.

[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 4 points 8 hours ago

kinda like how SA have banned LGBTq, immediately deports people if they come out.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

A lunatic Nazi clown says what?

[–] p3n@lemmy.world 17 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I can hardly believe that we have devolved so far, so quickly. We are literally one step away from becoming an authoritarian dictatorship. The plan is this:

  1. Deport (and by deport, they mean imprison for life) immigrants. These immigrants will mostly be legitimately illegal and gang associated criminals, but there will be a few individuals with legal standing and no criminal records. This could simply be the result of denying due process, or it could be an intentional test. The important factor is that 5th Amendment Due process rights are denied to all of them. The fact that these people (but be sure to de-humanize them as much as possible) are immigrants will be the distracting factor. <---- We are here

  2. Deport (and by deport, they mean imprison for life) criminals. These will be legitimate criminals with legitimately horrible records; that will be the distracting issue that will be made the focus of the argument: "They are serial killers, rapists, pedophiles, we don't want them here, so we should get rid of them." This has already been announced as the plan: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUfrwWz-m5I . That is not the point! The point is that they are still U.S. citizens, despite their crimes. The significance of this is that it will be the final barrier that needs to be broken, and the final protection that must be dismantled for the final solution to be enacted. If no one steps up and successfully defends the constitutional rights of these American citizens, then all the pieces will be in place for step 3.

  3. Deport (and by deport, they mean imprison for life) political dissidents, rivals, business opponents, and maybe just anyone the administration doesn't like. If they are political dissidents they will claim that they have committed crimes like, "hate speech against America(TM)", if they are a minority, they will be "associated with gangs", if they are business rivals it will have committed "economic terrorism", or something like that. It doesn't really matter because they eliminated due process in step 1 (remember that was the important factor, not the immigrant dis-tractor), and without due process they don't have to prove any crimes. Our last defense would have been the simple fact that we are American Citizens, but we established that doesn't matter in step 2 because they were "bad people", but now the "bad people" are whoever the administration decides is bad.

The context of the 5th amendment is important to understand its intent:

Historically, the Fifth Amendment draws significant influence from English common law. The grand jury clause specifically dates back to the Magna Carta, and was designed to protect accused persons from prosecution by the English royalty. In keeping with that intention, the Constitution’s framers opted to adapt the grand jury to the Constitution, so as to protect citizens from prosecution by the federal government.
Reagan Library

Even in a Monarchy, which is not the form of government we are supposed to have, the Magna Carta offered protections against the King from prosecuting commoners, which is the origin of this amendment. We aren't just devolving to pre-revolution America, which had enough disagreements with the rule of King George III that it sparked a war...no we are devolving to a pre-Magna Carta England type of Government. We are descending into middle-age feudalism with complete authoritarian rule.... and we aren't fortunate enough to have a dictator like Alfred the Great.

[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 hours ago

He literally SAID he was going to do this. I don’t understand why anyone is surprised.

[–] Ton@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Ledericas@lemm.ee 3 points 8 hours ago

thiel unlike many other billionaire seems to stay out of the spotlight, because they dont want attention upon themselves, hes a mastermind of TRUMP through vance. thiel being GAY also makes him a big target if hes in the news too many times. one of the reasons he went after gawker by using hogan as intermediary.

[–] fireduck@lem.trashbrain.org 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Skipping the first amendment would be making some speech illegal. With like a law and courts. They are also skipping the 5th, which would be due process.

[–] barneypiccolo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 hour ago

The Founding Fathers gave us the 2nd Amendment as a protection against anyone who would take away any of the other amendments. These people are DARING us to use it.

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 20 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Why do Americans still talk about the constitution like it means something or is still relevant?

Your constitution is GONE. It's a historical artifact. It has no meaning in today's America.

All that matters now is the whim of the emotional toddler in the White House. Get used to it. He's not going until he's dead.

[–] KMAMURI@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

They can't grasp that they will have to pick up arms to get their country back and they'll fight you about it too.

[–] BlackSheep@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

And PP is having wet dreams about destroying Canada in the same way. FFS Get out and vote!!!

[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

On trump's new voting machines with back end processing via musk's starlink. Like I say, he's not going till he's dead.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 33 points 15 hours ago (9 children)

I love America… I fucking hate Trump, MAGA and the GOP.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] match@pawb.social 19 points 13 hours ago

america means freedom and diversity and immigrants. the trump administration hates america

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 9 points 12 hours ago

Just for the record, I hate America and I think you should too.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 48 points 17 hours ago (9 children)

Some worried the administration was veering into authoritarian territory.

Oh good, you're finally awake. Let's get you caught up on the last six months.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Auzy@aussie.zone 13 points 13 hours ago

Put Trump and his family on the first boat then..

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

He's been in office 3 months. Please kill me, make it quick

[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 7 points 11 hours ago

Just start yelling about supporting Palestine. It'll probably happen

load more comments
view more: next ›