this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
1069 points (98.8% liked)

News

28902 readers
4324 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In December, Luigi Mangione was arrested for shooting health insurance executive Brian Thompson. Last week, Trump’s attorney general, Pam Bondi, announced that she was seeking the death penalty. It’s a highly unusual announcement, since Mangione hasn’t even been indicted yet on a federal level. (He has been indicted in Manhattan.) By intervening in this high-profile case, the Trump administration has made clear that it believes that CEOs are especially important people whose deaths need to be swiftly and mercilessly avenged.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] oji@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] ComradeRachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 159 points 1 week ago (9 children)

I think the death penalty being on the table would increase the likelihood of the jury finding a reasonable doubt or jury nullification. It would only hurt the prosecution imo.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 128 points 1 week ago (8 children)

OR it's going to prejudice the jury against him, like it usually does.

When capital punishment is on the table, only people who are in favor of it are selected for the jury, and people who are in favor of state murder are MUCH more likely to return a guilty verdict than people who aren't.

That's one of hundreds of reasons why civilized legal systems don't murder prisoners anymore.

[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe 35 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why the fuck does the prosecution have the ability to put punishments on the table that are known to bias jury selection?

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 57 points 1 week ago

Because the system itself is rigged in favor of the prosecution by design.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I kind of agree, if I were in the jury, it would make me think twice about finding them guilty since I would feel like I have someone’s death on my hands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Why does it feel like the trump administration would use Mangione's acquittal by jury as a reason to try to attack and do away with the 6th Amendment (trial by jury amendment)?

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Chozo@fedia.io 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yep, if you set the bar extraordinarily high, then you have to jump extraordinarily high. Bondi's likely doing more harm than good for her cause.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 50 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Assuming his trial is carried out normally and isn't a sham

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 141 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The bullets Mangione used to kill Thomson had “deny,” “delay,” and “depose” inscribed on them.

Allegedly. The reporter forgot to be professional for a moment.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 40 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe 117 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I'm glad they're seeking the death penalty.

Because it makes it much easier for the defence team to argue that the prosecution is trying to turn the law into a spectacle, and that Luigi should be acquitted of all charges.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 25 points 1 week ago

The federal system gives the judge a lot more power, they can basically pick the jury and evidence themselves, and appeals really, really suck.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 23 points 1 week ago

It doesn't much matter if it's easier for the defense to argue that. It matters what the judge and jury find.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 116 points 1 week ago (1 children)

None of this, of course, is to say that what Mangione did was justifiable or wise.

Um, fuck you? He hasn't been convicted and the author's assumption here, that Mangione is guilty of what he has been accused of, is part of the fucking problem.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 18 points 1 week ago

Damn, when did Jacobin get soft?

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 77 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, we have a convicted felon and rapist as president already.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 17 points 1 week ago

Exactly. They've set a precedent that running for office gets you out of any consequences. I really want to see what happens if Mangione runs for congress

[–] Gudl@feddit.org 47 points 1 week ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] smokingpistol@lemm.ee 27 points 1 week ago

He’s a real true America hero and a patriot! Que Viva Luigi!

[–] Lolseas@lemmy.world 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So what are the odds of jury nullification on this case?

[–] FenderStratocaster@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (10 children)

That depends on whether or not jury nullification is in favor of billionaires....which it isn't. So it won't happen.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›