this post was submitted on 16 Apr 2025
295 points (99.0% liked)

News

28669 readers
6026 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In December, Luigi Mangione was arrested for shooting health insurance executive Brian Thompson. Last week, Trump’s attorney general, Pam Bondi, announced that she was seeking the death penalty. It’s a highly unusual announcement, since Mangione hasn’t even been indicted yet on a federal level. (He has been indicted in Manhattan.) By intervening in this high-profile case, the Trump administration has made clear that it believes that CEOs are especially important people whose deaths need to be swiftly and mercilessly avenged.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe 15 points 1 hour ago

I'm glad they're seeking the death penalty.

Because it makes it much easier for the defence team to argue that the prosecution is trying to turn the law into a spectacle, and that Luigi should be acquitted of all charges.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 2 points 21 minutes ago

He should run for office

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 29 points 3 hours ago

The bullets Mangione used to kill Thomson had “deny,” “delay,” and “depose” inscribed on them.

Allegedly. The reporter forgot to be professional for a moment.

[–] Gudl@feddit.org 10 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] imetators@lemm.ee 2 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

Californians would die of heart attack after eating all of them

[–] whiskeytango@lemm.ee 3 points 26 minutes ago* (last edited 24 minutes ago)

At least then they could afford to have a heart attack. Heck, have two

[–] ComradeRachel@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 5 hours ago (6 children)

I think the death penalty being on the table would increase the likelihood of the jury finding a reasonable doubt or jury nullification. It would only hurt the prosecution imo.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

OR it's going to prejudice the jury against him, like it usually does.

When capital punishment is on the table, only people who are in favor of it are selected for the jury, and people who are in favor of state murder are MUCH more likely to return a guilty verdict than people who aren't.

That's one of hundreds of reasons why civilized legal systems don't murder prisoners anymore.

[–] LeninsOvaries@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Why the fuck does the prosecution have the ability to put punishments on the table that are known to bias jury selection?

Because the system itself is rigged in favor of the prosecution by design.

[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 30 minutes ago

Doesn't the defense have just as much say in terms of who gets selected out and which signals are used to parse that

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 5 hours ago

I kind of agree, if I were in the jury, it would make me think twice about finding them guilty since I would feel like I have someone’s death on my hands.

[–] Chozo@fedia.io 14 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, if you set the bar extraordinarily high, then you have to jump extraordinarily high. Bondi's likely doing more harm than good for her cause.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 33 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Assuming his trial is carried out normally and isn't a sham

[–] char_stats@lemm.ee 3 points 4 hours ago

This ☝️

[–] primemagnus@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Trump and his sycophants are really really dumb. Like, really. All they have is muscle. Zero brains.

[–] whiskeytango@lemm.ee 3 points 22 minutes ago

I didn't realize muscle was so flabby

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

Why does it feel like the trump administration would use Mangione's acquittal by jury as a reason to try to attack and do away with the 6th Amendment (trial by jury amendment)?

[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Luckily it would be really hard for them to actually get rid of it. I wouldn't put it past them to try to start doing summary executions or just illegally trying to detain people without trial or whatever but there's 0 chance they get the support to actually remove that amendment.

[–] whostosay@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

They're just going to skip the courts altogether like they've been doing.

[–] takeda@lemm.ee 6 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

My worry is that trump is thinking of sending him to CECOT.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Trump always starts with the “worst” criminals as he knows it’s hard for Democrats or others to object since they don’t want to be “on the side of criminals,” but it won’t end there.