this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
791 points (99.1% liked)

politics

23035 readers
4250 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

$150 billion: that’s the grand total of savings Elon Musk revealed last Thursday that he and his DOGE team are “expecting” to make after months of ruthless and often mindless cuts.

To call this a monumentally unimpressive number doesn’t do it justice. Musk’s “savings” here — which are already error-ridden and inflated in the first place, created by totaling up spending that never actually existed or that was, alternately, either already cut or never actually was — represent just 15% of the trillion dollars he originally promised he would slash.

In fact, government spending so far under Donald Trump has actually gone up compared to the last two years under Joe Biden.

“Musk will have effectively crippled the modern American state and ripped vital services away from ordinary Americans in order to pay for more waste at the Pentagon.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Which is what Putin has tasked him with.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 139 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

“Musk will have effectively crippled the modern American state and ripped vital services away from ordinary Americans in order to pay for more waste at the Pentagon.”

So, mission accomplished then? I never believed for a moment it was ever about reducing waste / increasing efficiency. At best, it was scrounging the government couch for change to pay for tax breaks for the rich.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 31 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Well, yeah. He should have named it the Department of Dismantling the Administrative State, but that's not a meme.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 15 points 3 days ago

should have named it the Department of Dismantling the Administrative State, but that's not a meme.

At least if you read the acronym backwards, SADD, it's fitting.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The only waste in government is corruption. “Inefficiencies” are actually resiliency—a crucial trait of any social system.

[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 7 points 2 days ago

Underappreciated fact.

I was listening to conservative AM radio (combo of morbid curiosity and masochism), and they talked about a social security warehouse full of documents and how inefficient that is in 2025, and we should get rid of it.

I’m just like:

First of all, there’s no way that’s their primary data source. So if you’re crying for modernization, that already happened a long time ago.

But if you’re saying we shouldn’t preserve paper copies, then you’re opening the door to all sorts of terrible things.

Like, saying we should just trust whatever the government says and not have to prove it in a court of law, or making our systems vulnerable to hackers, or making it so certain government actions can never be undone.

But uh... I guess all three of those things have become hallmarks of this administration anyway, huh?

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 61 points 2 days ago (4 children)

150 billion

Yeah and if you actually believe that to be true then I have a bridge to sell you. These dumb fucks sold 8 million as 8 billion

I'd be surprised if it's even close to 15 billion

[–] PlzGivHugs@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

These dumb fucks sold 8 million as 8 billion

Even aside from stuff like this, things they claim to be saving tend to be cut contracts. Contracts that have already been paid, but will no longer have to provided what they'd been paid for.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Also they lost like 500Bn according to the IRS due to cutting IRS staff alone, not including revenue lost as a result of cutting services that the government provided and revenue lost as a result of other nations no longer doing business with the USA such as arms sales, energy, rocketry, hospitals, and other transactions.

By all accounts DOGE is losing money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] schema@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It also completely ignored the cost of the consequences, which is likely going to easily outpace any money "saved".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 43 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The goal was never to save money but find ways to enrich himself.

[–] Tryenjer@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Ending democracy, that's their true goal.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] garretble@lemmy.world 80 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The amount of money it’ll take to fix all this will dwarf the $150B. By several factors at least.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 42 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

The CFPB people he cut were saving citizens - i.e. the very taxpayers Musk claims to represent without a mandate of any kind - $21 billion already.

He was selling our dollars for pennies.

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

It doesn't count unless it goes to the government. Taxes and exploitation are good as long as they come from private companies instead of the government because freedom is a vibe rather than an actual set of circumstances.

Good thing the US is trashing all their trade agreements, then. That'll make paying for it so much easier.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blacklisted@lemmy.org 63 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He did the absolute reverse of saving. He destroyed and cost the US TRILLIONS of dollars. The IRS alone will not collect an additional +$500 billion in revenue this year and every year going forward. Over ten years, that's $5 trillion in extra uncollected revenue, and I'm sure this is a conservative estimate.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 32 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

You mean the IRS alone will not steal an additional +$500 billion from the poor, helpless billionaires this year, right? /s

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

for half a second I thought this comment was just poor because of how late the billionaires part came in the sentence.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] moitoi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

People don't understand that a state isn't a private company, and you can't manage the state like in the private sector.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

$150 billion

Does this even take into account all the extra work and thus spending doge's flailing caused?

[–] nolannice@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago (2 children)

In addition to that cutting NOAA staff only saves money until the next hurricane hits, cutting the CDC only saves money until the next outbreak hits, cutting the FDA only saves money until the next foodborne contamination etc. etc.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

FDA only saves money until the next foodborne contamination etc. etc.

We've already had an e. coli outbreak that the FDA tried to keep quiet.

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 8 points 3 days ago (2 children)

One would think the US already has enough experience in how it does not work like that, but it seems the guys in power are determined to walk that road til the end. What's the end though?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 days ago

And lawyer time

[–] fox2263@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

Doesn’t matter to the supporters. They believe he has streamlined government and saved gazillions. And if you don’t like DOGE there must be something wrong with you. Why wouldn’t you want a more efficient government without fraud and waste? Do you want waste?

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 27 points 3 days ago

just as planned girl fire meme

I feel I'm doing Me-lon a favor by comparing him to this amazing piece of internet history but there we are.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I'm possibly more worried about what he didn't destroy at this point. What's gone will at least be rebuilt largely from scratch by people that care about restoring those institutions.

My huge worry now is what backdoors are now in systems like social security that impacts us all and we may not find out about for a long time. How much identity theft and scamming will go on now that outside actors likely have access to some or all of that data?

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

https://www.npr.org/2025/04/15/nx-s1-5355896/doge-nlrb-elon-musk-spacex-security

Every. Fucking. Thing that doge touched has been backdoored to Russia. Doge is a front to get sensitive information to the Kremlin. Elon is a fucking traitor.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, exactly, and once I read this yesterday I allowed myself to rule out that I was just thinking the worst.

Daniel Bertulis appeared on The Lead, joined by his attorney Andrew Bakaj, and explained the details of how he apparently uncovered a massive amount of missing data from the NLRB following DOGE’s efforts. He ostensibly mocked a White House statement touting the transparency at play, noting that none of the code used by DOGE technicians has been shared publicly.

But the most shocking allegations came from Bakaj, who not only claimed that accounts based in Russia were using newly created DOGE usernames and passwords to access sensitive data, but also directly tied the effort to Elon Musk and his Starlink concerns, which has a relationship with the Kremlin.

“There are two data points that I wanna point out that should give everybody pause,” Bakaj said. “The first thing, what Dan witnessed was that within 15 minutes of DOGE employees creating user accounts, i.e. Usernames and passwords, within 15 minutes of those accounts being created, somebody or something from Russia tried to log in with the right username and right passwords — that is to say — the right credentials. And that happened over 20 times.”

“The second data point, which is really critical, is that DOGE has also been using Starlink as a means to exfiltrate data,” he continued. “What that means is that, from our understanding, Russia has a direct pipeline of information through Starlink, which means that anything going through Starlink is going to Russia.”

I think I got this link from some Lemmy post yesterday, and I don't like that I don't know the source, but it seems to fit what is being talked about in regular mainstream reporting.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The whistleblower and his lawyer were on Rachel Maddow if you want a more reputable source. He also said that they taped a picture of him walking his dog to his door that was taken via drone as a sort of threat.

https://youtu.be/DLPL0MZ7aVQ

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Hikuro93@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Heard of the whistleblower related to DOGE who claims the tech group hired by Musk had already tried to breach government for years or so?

And how with each DOGE visit to a given department it always followed tactics of distraction and getting stored data, then suddenly leaving?

And how there's suddenly many breach attempts by suspicious hackers linked to Russia right after DOGE visits?

Or how the biggest culprit of government bloating by hecking far, the Department of Defense, same department who has failed several audits, was never a target of DOGE?

Hm... Not suspicious at all. Sadly I can't recall the source, but I think it was on YouTube.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago

NOT True! NOW that we saved a couple Million we can Afford BILLIONS in Contracts for Elon Musk and El Salvador and Greenland and my Kids is Starving because they Cut his Funding!

[–] SkavarSharraddas@gehirneimer.de 20 points 3 days ago

His goal was to get rid of regulators who dared regulate his companies, and suck up all the data for AI-BS (and possibly extortion). Quit accepting his framing and look at what he really did.

[–] xyzzy@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

$150 billion is the target for FY 2025, not what they've actually saved.

And as the article says, we already know that their "receipts" were mostly wrong or bullshit, so even that number will be inflated.

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago

THAT was not the point

The destruction of the Nation, was.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 12 points 3 days ago (5 children)

To put it into perspective...if Elon Musk were working paycheck-to-paycheck, he found enough money in the couch the night before payday to buy a pack of smokes.

[–] fossilesque@mander.xyz 8 points 2 days ago

With the damage done, it would be like he got a hernia while looking for the change only to find out how shitty his health insurance is.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 11 points 3 days ago (4 children)

It doesn’t matter when the loads of idiots think he’s a genius. My dad is one of them. He refuses to believe anything that would call this into question calling it fake news. What am I even supposed to do?

[–] johndroid@fedia.io 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)

My mother-in-law thinks he's an altruistic genius—essentially a super-hero. It seems the maga boomer internet is filled with AI generated sites that spread the Gospel of Musk. The one I saw was ludicrous: it promised that Elon has developed an amazing sci-fi wheelchair that he will soon be making available for under $200 (!). The wheelchairs pictured were obvious Dall-E level AI slop, the text read like it was translated into English by GPT. Nobody with even rudimentary critical thinking would believe these absurd claims.

But the comment section was littered with desperate old people pleading to knew where they could order these mobile miracles. A Cargo Cult of credulous, desperate fools.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

The generation that warned us all growing up about how we shouldn't believe anything on the Internet will now swallow anything they read on the Internet (without any critical thinking) as long as it has a like from one of their friends.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

And we let him. I propose a sea burial. But let him try to explain fir...nah get in the box!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] meep_launcher@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I mean I've been told this is the year to fudge on your taxes since the IRS is fucked so I mean maybe there's some silver lining. Frankly Elon isn't as bad as- hold on someone's knocking on my door, I'll be back in a bit.

[–] Turret3857@infosec.pub 6 points 2 days ago

just FYI, its easier to audit a poor/middle class person because they dont pay 600 lawyers to play with where the money is for tax loopholes. Unless youre a multimillionaire you'll probably end up regretting fudging anything unfortunately.

[–] huppakee@lemm.ee 4 points 2 days ago

Might not be the year to break laws though, considering even judges can't save you

To call this a monumentally unimpressive number doesn’t do it justice. Musk’s “savings” here — which are already error-ridden and inflated in the first place, created by totaling up spending that never actually existed or that was, alternately, either already cut or never actually was — represent just 15% of the trillion dollars he originally promised he would slash.

7.5%. He promised $2 trillion in cuts.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

He saved all of our personal and national security information to give to the kremlin

[–] 13igTyme@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

The US budget is $7 trillion. Even if we pretend he saved $150 billion, that's 2% of the budget.

load more comments
view more: next ›