this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
39 points (91.5% liked)

No Stupid Questions

40175 readers
1295 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 12 points 3 hours ago

The selection process is via an election of cardinals. Generally, if a small group elects someone for a position, that person usually comes from that voting group. Therefore, while not a requirement, an elected pope is generally a cardinal.

Beyond that, a pope has great influence over the Catholic Church. It would be very remarkable that a young person could have that much influence over the cardinals to get elected. It could happen, but the likelihood is rare.

[–] libra00@lemmy.world 21 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Because only cardinals can be pope and it takes a long time to work your way up through the priesthood into administration and such like any organization. Also, unlike most businesses or governments they never hire some young(-ish) new ceo or department head from outside.

[–] ChairmanMeow@programming.dev 1 points 35 minutes ago

Actually any Catholic man could be Pope, but the cardinals usually pick one of their own.

[–] chirospasm@lemmy.ml 73 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

The short, easy answer: it typically takes a lifetime of service for the rest of the church to determine if they fit the bill to be Pope.

Also, old people run everything these days

[–] stankcheez@lemmy.world 39 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Also, the cardinals who choose the next pope typically don’t choose candidates who are only “moderately” old (in their 60s) b/c they might end up living with a pope they regret electing for 20+ years

[–] TheFogan@programming.dev 7 points 6 hours ago

You'd think there's not much reason for that... I mean, the god they believe in famously selected a lot of unqualified crazy people. Noah an alchoholic, David couldn't keep it in his pants, and had to arrange the death of one of his best soldiers to deal with it.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 29 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (2 children)

The older the average pope, the shorter the average term, and the more papal elections in a given span of time.

One of the main powers of cardinals is electing the pope, so more papal elections means more power for the college of cardinals.

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 19 minutes ago* (last edited 18 minutes ago)

It doesn't really makes much sense.

The amount of power is the same. They don't get more power by voting a pope every 5 years rather than every 30 years. They still vote for the pope, the person in that position is always there because it was voted by the Cardinals.

If something it would be the opposite. Selecting a person for a longer period would give you more power as your decision is more time in place unable to be challenged.

[–] gigachad@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I guess this is a side effect, but I doubt it is the reason.

[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 9 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

It’s an emergent phenomenon—institutions will naturally behave in ways that increase their power, without that necessarily being the conscious intention of any given member.

[–] zxqwas@lemmy.world 31 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)
  1. Because you can see his previous work and determine if you think he is suitable for the job.

  2. If you make a bad pick he will see himself out soon enough anyway.

Pun intended.

[–] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 22 points 7 hours ago

Technically, they don't have to be. They could elect a venerable whippersnapper cardinal - Dan Brown wrote a book about that. And that tells you how likely that is if he wrote the story. But it is possible.

It would be rare because it takes seniority to get into the position. And politics to be well liked enough to be put forward and then elected. By mostly old people. Some of whom would like the job themselves.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 7 hours ago

They serve for life (or until resignation), so if someone relatively young is elected pope, the same person will be pope for many decades. The cardinals don't typically want that to happen, so they'll tend to want to elect someone who is probably going to die soon.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 11 points 6 hours ago

What do you call old? John Paul II was 58 (? - I can't find the exact dates he took power so I might be off by a year depending on birthday) which is relatively young. He then remained in power for 27 years (again because I can't find exact days I might be off by a year). Which as others have pointed out is a problem: that was 27 years where anyone (read cardinal) who didn't like the current direction had no ability to do anything. IIRC the previous popes before him only served a few years and so there was concern that they hadn't served long enough to be useful leaders and at the time someone who would be around longer was desired.

Of course if you are 20 58 seems really old. However when you get older it no longer seems old. With average lifespans of about 80, at 60 you still have 20 more years. OTOH, starting about 65 deaths from natural causes start taking off (younger than that death is nearly always an accident) . How do you want to define old?

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Im not sure if its exactly a requirement but priests have to have a degree and usually an advanced degree. Granted many get it in divinity but they also have to do seminary which can't start until age 25 and it is at least 5 years. So priests basically start out at age 30 and technically a pope could make one a cardinal right away in practice the average age of a cardinal is like 70. Popes can be drawn from anyone but are usually biships. Bishop are required to have a doctorate in divinity and be over age 35. They are also expected to be known for all sorts of good qualities. So figure to be known enough you can add 10 years being a biship. So for all practical purposes its very doubtful someone would be name pope before age 50 and they have usually been 60's or 70's.

[–] OfCourseNot@fedia.io 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

While you are right on everything said there's only three requirements to be pope: having a penis, being baptized in the Catholic Church, and having being ordered a bishop. The last too can be done real quick in a pinch so the only hard pre-requisite is having your junk hanging down there, no need to be a priest even.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 5 hours ago

yeah technically, but as I said they are usually bishops and actually usually cardinals actually which has a average age in the 70's. So technically it could be younger but realistically it will not.

Gotta make sure they've had time to put together enough blackmail material on a candidate first. That way if he (c'mon, like it'll be anything other than a "he" within our lifetimes) turns out to be too much of a reformer, they can shut that shit down.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social -1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Because Gerontocracy is the true law of the land, and is older than both capitalism and feudalism.