this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
314 points (99.7% liked)

World News

46074 readers
5277 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Would a decade in prison be a tariff? If not, maybe the execs would prefer that, rather than make the company pay the fine. Won't someone think about the company?

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

They call it a 'tariff', I call it a light slap on the wrist. Add a few zeros to make the fine match the damage, EU!

[–] Susurrus@lemm.ee 30 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This is neither new nor surprising. They casually break EU-US personal data transfer agreements like they're nothing. They know perfectly well they will be fined, but they profit infinitely more from breaking EU law than they have to pay up in fines. It's a simple business decision. The EU Comission is being very lenient here, like they've been for years.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 4 points 10 hours ago

They are used to not having to respond to rules and laws and make more money than the fines take so it is a business as usual, and the reason is that "they" in this context is not human. It is an entity of raw unapologetic competitor for ending planet earth, an entity that strives only for profit and harvest any human in the way, even those inside it that help it. There exist no compassion or afterthought for if human lives are worth anything, instead if one of the zealot lawyers in its show any sign of not obeying they are replaced so that the giant demonic machine can ensure that every human inside it is currently doing their best to betray their own race. All the blood money from profits is available to use for this goal, but also the minds of humans that can strategically plant comments and enact articles like this, where they play off the political divide and wars and destruction of the planet. Only to distract even, they don't need anything but time until we die out so they can focus on profits more

[–] etuomaala@sopuli.xyz 10 points 9 hours ago

More of a flick than a whack.

[–] riodoro1@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Let them operate just a couple years more and the far right will win elections in half of the eu.

Are these people blind? Can’t they see who’s pushing the idiot propaganda?

[–] Aliktren@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Can you imagine the backlash if governments started banning social media, banning politics on social media seems more doable but also problematic

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 11 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

This isn’t just about a fine; the Commission forcing us to change our business model effectively imposes a multibillion-dollar tariff on Meta

Technically true I guess, (A Fine is a Price, U Gneezy) but only since it's not enough of a fine. Make it €200 billion instead of €200 million.

[–] vxx@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

If your business model is violating personal rights, you should have never made it a business model in the first place. Same goes for anti-competetive actions that violate the laws.

[–] Skydancer@pawb.social 5 points 12 hours ago

They could have imposed up to €55 billion across the two companies. That doubles for repeat offenders. This was clearly meant as a warning.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Yes fuck because a demonic data harvesting entity is not okay with humans. In our contry we do not have corpos deciding laws, it's also very illegal because corporations are not human and considered gods like in your empire. Hope this helps to explain

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

In Australia corporations aren't considered people, Hope that helps to explain.

[–] Litebit@lemmy.world 35 points 21 hours ago

fine Meta for calling it a tariff.

[–] Hikuro93@lemmy.world 24 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Looking forward to where this goes if Europe sticks to its guns when things get ugly. Let them belittle us, let them antagonize, misdirect and make fun.

We haven't even started pressing where it really hurts the US and its oligarchs. Which is precisely their precious digital exports we all consume and barely tax.

Never give in to bullies. Absolutely never, no matter how enticing or harmless they make it seem. Watch them repeat a Trump-China by poking the bear then sheepishly back down and say "Europe needs to make a deal with us" when it bites their behind.

[–] thericofactor@sh.itjust.works 97 points 1 day ago

Of course they want to politicize this. And the EU is being far too careful here, these amounts are only 1.5% of the maximum penalty. They got off easy

[–] MolecularCactus1324@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 1 points 2 hours ago

I'd suggest banning them from existence, but maybe that's just me.

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 1 day ago

The cost of doing business for them. Make the fines actually proportional and ongoing until they stop breaking the laws

[–] roserose56@lemmy.ca 12 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Penalty Tariff ? no, no Meta, this is what you need to pay monthly, for all the data you sell and use without consent!

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 5 points 12 hours ago

€200 million per month for all European users data is likely well within 'cost of business' for Facebook...

[–] lily33@lemm.ee 39 points 1 day ago

Meta calls its penalty a ‘tariff’

That's a retaliatory tariff. Meta broke the law, and the EU retaliated.

[–] ColdWater@lemmy.ca 9 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

800m is just a small change for them

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 8 points 21 hours ago

That's true, but they got fined for their violations which they want to continue, and future fines are likely.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, no. The real tariffs come when the EU starts to charge them through the nose for using EU customer data. This is on the agenda for when some real retaliation is needed.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 17 points 1 day ago

Well, the Italian IRS decided that the Italian users data is worth €18 billion so they want to get €4 billion in vat from Facebook lol

[–] adarza@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

has zuck always been this fucking stupid, or has he just been eating his own dog food too long?

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It’s manipulative, not stupid.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 4 points 10 hours ago

Yeah more hateful and betraying humanity plotting to end the life of our entire planet. Stupid is such a small word

[–] Fingolfinz@lemmy.world 31 points 1 day ago

Don’t let him off the hook by claiming it’s him being stupid. He’s spewing bad faith bullshit

[–] NoForwardslashS@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 day ago

Meta is a tariff on humanity.

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, now we know why Trump and JD Vance were saying anti-EU things lately

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 9 hours ago

The corpos control your laws, narrative, everything and they are considered to be human. They are demonic entities of destruction and you are slaves to their unending urge to divide and ruin our race. To kill us as profits are easier to achieve when humans are out of the equation

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

The rich and powerful are going mask off about being above the law. Fuck you lizard boy, and fuck Meta and their "products"

[–] joelvdc@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Oh yeah, wait! Law should be shaped after Meta’s way of doing business, so unfair.

[–] commander@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Just trying to market on stupidity like Trump

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, apparently, meta can be charged with higher tariffs