this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
665 points (97.2% liked)

News

28981 readers
4023 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OmegaMan@lemmings.world 10 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Crazy how so many people have been begging for bare ones, affordable electric vehicles.

Then when one comes on the scene they do nothing but complain. Can't please anybody these days it seems.

[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

They claim 20k, which is nice, but noone will believe it will stay that way. Given the [gestures broadly to everything] they likely will need to find an non-lithium based alternative battery before the reserves run dry, the price sky-rockets and then would-be buyers deal with scalper prices (not like thats much different than going to a dealership anyway).

This would have been a smash hit in 2022, but now its too little, too late.

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

The 20k is after government incentives, definitely not permanent pricing. Lithium isn't scarce in the US, at least. The McDermitt Caldera reserves are quite substantial. More than half of the world's total supply.

[–] droans@midwest.social 1 points 4 hours ago

Its range is also only 180 miles. The smaller battery definitely helps keep the cost down.

This car might not be for me but I definitely see its value and hope they're successful.

[–] OmegaMan@lemmings.world 1 points 6 hours ago

20k after 7500 tax incentive. So 27,500 approximately. Cheapest EVs are I think 29k right now. So this is well within the realm of possibility imo. It will probably go up a bit by the time it makes it out the door. And probably no one will get the barebones model and spend 2-3k at least on accessories.

[–] ArchaicHuman@lemmy.world 23 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

It’s backed by Bezos. Wouldn’t even consider it for that reason alone.

[–] Texas_Hangover@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

What else are you going to do? I hate Bezoz as much as anybody, but if I could actually get one of these for 25k? I'd buy three of them just to keep around for emergencies.

[–] the_q@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago

Just not buy one?

[–] untakenusername@sh.itjust.works 2 points 8 hours ago

I'm sure, somehow, mostly everything is at least slightly backed by bezos

[–] b161@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 7 hours ago

Lost me at “American”.

[–] jaykrown@lemm.ee 22 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (6 children)

The design is bad. The front trunk is a bad use of space, and the Japanese figured this out decades ago with the Kei truck. If you want to see real utility, look at this design.

[–] jmf@lemm.ee 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Front trunks save lives in collisions though. I'd 100% rather be in a vehicle with a hood between me and another car, and I say this as an avid kei-truck fan.

[–] ExtraPartsLeft@lemmy.world 10 points 9 hours ago (9 children)

The front trunk is a safety feature called a crumple zone and is objectively safer to be in a crash with.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Counterpoint: One of the first things people buy for a truck is a container for the bed for things they don't want to be in the weather but also not in the cab.

A front-trunk eliminates this need which also frees up bed space.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BiteSizedZeitGeist@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago (3 children)

Americans won't buy a Kei truck though. Granted, the frunk is a marketing concession, but it's a fine one, if it can help push the market away from huge and expensive SUVs.

Or, more succinctly, don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 5 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Americans can't buy them new because of the so-called Chicken Tax. We can only import them if they're speed-governed, or at least 25 years old.

Even with those restrictions, lots of Americans want them, including me. There are quite a few importers bringing them over, including one that just started up in my area. They're desirable enough that major media outlets are running articles about how people who need to get real work done covet kei trucks.

Yes, Americans would buy them. Americans are buying them.

[–] jaykrown@lemm.ee 2 points 4 hours ago

Yep, the Chevrolet Bolt is the closest I could get to a Kei van.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] wowwoweowza@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Is it a networked surveillance nightmare?

[–] Rhusta@midwest.social 2 points 5 hours ago

It doesn't seem to come with any gadgets. No touch screen, not even a radio. It's possible that it still broadcasts location data and it's possible they could hide a mic to record audio as well. But it isn't connecting to your phone with Bluetooth, it can't exploit the Bluetooth connection to scrub your messages and socials. So it's a LOT better than most new cars.

[–] SuperSpruce@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

Less reason to believe that it is than most cars that literally market themselves as connected

[–] uis@lemm.ee 13 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

no touchscreen

Sounds like a dream. Or public transport. It doesn't have touchscreen either.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tfm@europe.pub 15 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I hate that Bezos backed them

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] etuomaala@sopuli.xyz 21 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I find this minimalism strangely appealing. Unfortunately, I do not live on a farm. I hope this thing is useful to those who do, though.

[–] A_Union_of_Kobolds@lemmy.world 11 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I pretty much do and I'm kinda stoked, cautiously

If I can have a Linux truck that works and can tow something if need be... I'm down

[–] admin@sh.itjust.works 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Linux truck

And has to resemble the late 1970s-1980s body styles because of the kiss methodology. I'd love me a 1972 C10 or a 1981 F150 with Debian.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 6 points 9 hours ago

The msrp of this truck is $28000. For having nothing in it that is absurd. Not to mention the rebates put it at 20k but you still have to pay upfront which deters most people from getting. Overall shit truck, shit design, shit price.

[–] TheObviousSolution@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

Good luck, independent car manufacturers usually get bankrupted out of business directly or indirectly by a market dominated by traditional car manufacturing lobbies designed to be replete with minefields that usually go up in difficulty just before it's supposed to reach mass production. There have been plenty of innovative EV designs that have died off because of this, and it's telling how much power those lobbies have when its the one thing countries will unite against to keep Chinese competition off of their borders.

[–] elucubra@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 hours ago

This is like the electric version of the bare-bones Toyota ICE pickup

[–] ShotDonkey@lemmy.world 5 points 10 hours ago

Frugal design. I love it.

[–] PacMan@sh.itjust.works 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Glad someone has the balls to produce a truck people actually want. Give me power windows, locks, radio, cruise and a cheap radio and I am fine. I guess I throw in 4x4 because I live in Colorado.

I would love to also see an ice or a hybrid version of this truck too. This is exactly want so many people are wanting right now. Very excited to see this EV when it hits the road

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] eurisko@lemmy.ca 3 points 9 hours ago

But does it break when water ?

load more comments
view more: next ›