That's quite the number of assumptions you made there
Opinionhaver
Reddit is more diverse. The same kind of cynicism exists there too but it's dilluted by all the other content so it's easier to ignore. Here that is less the case as majority of the content is news articles - granted that I haven't been to reddit for over a year so I don't know what it's like today.
Agreed. This is the most cynical corner of the internet I've ever been to, yet here I'm.
There's plenty of censorship here though. Some instances are worse than others but even on a community basis, your average moderator is just some random dude who is free to remove your posts/comments and ban you just because they don't like something you said and there's not really anything you can do about it.
Fediverse as a technology yes but the userbase here does the opposite. By definition someone commenting on a message board is not a normal person because normal people don't do that, but to be commenting on a niche platform like this makes you hyper not-normal, and yes, that applies to me as well and I'm well aware of that.
Wolves don't indiscriminate between invasive and endangered species though.
Not that I as a small bussines owner would expect anyone to use this to call me about my pricing or services but the call would end real quick when I realise I'm talking to an AI. I don't even have anything against AI per se, I talk with LLMs a lot. It's just that if you can be arsed to personally call me then I can't be arsed to serve your needs either - I have more serious customers to cater to.
It's hilarious how people turn everything into conspiracies nowdays, while at the same time dismissing every narrative they don't like as a conspiracy too. Just today, there's another thread about Gemini "refusing to discuss Bernie Sanders" while at the same time it gives the exact same answer when asked about Trump.
Isn't that what streamers are for?
This kind of "active" stock trading is essentially an attempt to predict the future. If you own Nvidia stock and hear about a new disruptive technology entering the market, you might predict that its stock value will drop. So, you sell now before the price falls too much, intending to buy back at a discount once you think it has stabilized.
When enough people do this, it triggers a chain reaction - investors see their holdings losing value and rush to sell before it's "too late." But in reality, it’s rarely too late because, more often than not, the price eventually rebounds. The only reason people lose money is that they panic and sell at a loss. There hasn’t been a single stock market crash in history that we haven’t recovered from.
That’s why writing news articles about short-term stock fluctuations is mostly pointless - these movements barely even register on the graph when viewed over the long term.
That’s a strange assumption. My pricing and services are listed on the flyer they likely first heard about me from, as well as on my website. You can also just call, email, or text and ask.
If you have a job for me but don’t want to "waste your time" by reaching out, I’m not too concerned about losing you as a customer. Virtually all of my previous clients seem to appreciate not just a job well done, but the one-on-one human connection as well. In fact, some of them seem to just want someone to talk to - the work itself feels almost secondary.