293
submitted 1 year ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Highlights:

On Friday, a Trump-appointed federal judge struck down an electoral map in Galveston, Texas, saying it violates the Voting Rights Act and amounts to “egregious” discrimination against Black and Latino voters.

Their map would have effectively erased representation of people of color at the highest levels of local government in a county that is 45 percent non-white.

If the new Galveston voting map had been upheld, the county would likely have lost its sole Black commissioner, Stephen Holmes.

Judge Brown ordered the county to redraw the map by October 20. Galveston County Judge Mark Henry, the county’s chief officer, says the county plans to appeal.

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 34 points 1 year ago

Galveston County Judge Mark Henry, the county’s chief officer, says the county plans to appeal. “The County followed redistricting law and did not engage in any racial discrimination,” he wrote in a statement. “We believe this will be vindicated by the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. As County Judge, I have never lost a Voting Rights Act case on appeal.”

Well, yeah. The Fifth Circuit is basically a Conservative rubber stamp, so of course you'd never lose. However, you're not the only one that gets to appeal, and with SCOTUS upholding that Alabama did exactly the same thing you are doing, you might ultimately lose anyway.

Either way, I hope your balls explode.

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Either way, I hope your balls explode.

Los Locos kick your ass!

Los Locos kick your face!

Los Locos kick your balls into outer space!!

[-] CaptainFortissimo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Wow. Now that's a reference I have heard in a long time. More input, Number 5!

[-] lingh0e@lemmy.film 4 points 1 year ago

Goddammit I love Lemmy.

[-] ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.de 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trump-appointed

In a functioning democracy, it should not matter who appointed the judge.

[-] Rhoeri@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Your keyword is “functioning democracy.” That doesn’t exist anymore.

[-] cultsuperstar@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

In a functioning anything, any judge, lawyer, clerk, whatever shouldn't have any political affiliation and their religious beliefs wouldn't influence their law decisions.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

I can't wait for the day the GOP tries to draw a map that completely discriminates against people and it turns out to make that happen, the districts are drawn like a swastika

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

When 4chan gets officials elected to office, we’re all doomed

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2023
293 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19138 readers
3354 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS