this post was submitted on 06 May 2025
1079 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

72859 readers
3046 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nous@programming.dev 365 points 2 months ago (17 children)

Yen also pointed out how such a court decision could help cut inflation in the US, too, "by dropping the price of a significant chunk of digital purchases by 30% overnight".

I bet most companies will just take that extra 30% as profit rather than giving it back to their users like proton has.

[–] athairmor@lemmy.world 81 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Yeah, even of the companies don’t pocket the difference, he’s an idiot to suggest that this will cut inflation.

This guy is just not very smart, I think.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 114 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I think he’s a salesperson trying to sell the idea that getting rid of the apple tax is good for consumers.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 2 months ago (9 children)

getting rid of the apple tax is good for consumers.

I mean that's not wrong. I had no idea Apple was double-dipping like this. I wonder if Google is doing the same thing...

[–] lepinkainen@lemmy.world 44 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Every store does this. Even Holy Valve

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

Every company who takes a cut from in-app purchases, be it subscriptions or DLC, should be kneecapped by this ruling.

It's one thing for the hosting marketplace (App Store, Steam, Play Store, etc) to take a cut from the initial purchase of a game/app. But it's a whole other issue for that initial marketplace to keep reaching further into the dev's pockets and take a cut from in-app purchases unrelated to where it was originally obtained.

[–] Greercase@lemmus.org 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That just turns paid apps into splash screens for in-app purchases though. That way apple never gets a cut because the "purchase" is in-app. Pay to be listed (maybe tiered depending on downloads) seems fair especially because it doesn't incentivize people to do scammy things with pricing. It's already a fee anyway.

[–] lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That just turns paid apps into splash screens for in-app purchases though

Welcome to Android lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] hikaru755@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

What? Since when does Valve prohibit companies from redirecting customers to non-Valve purchasing flows? Because that's what this ruling is about, it says Apple can't prohibit apps from telling users to go buy off-platform for lower prices. Valve isn't doing that with Steam afaik, actually I'm not aware of any other platform that does this

[–] JimmyMcGill@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Valve will even allow developers to create their own Steam keys free of charge and sell them wherever they want with no commission whatsoever

That’s pretty open I’d say

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] plz1@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago

Yeah, Proton is bucking the obvious trend, with this one. Most companies will totally take the profits rather than lowering prices.

[–] Zak@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

Companies that were app-first like mobile games probably won't cut prices much if any. Companies that were web-first like Proton and Patreon probably will.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] philycheeze@sh.itjust.works 129 points 2 months ago (26 children)

Do he still think fascism is good for small businesses though?

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] commander@lemmy.world 91 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Damn. People here sure love purity testing. The guy could pay for their cancer treatment and still slap him every chance because they got it wrong publicly in the past but once you get it wrong publicly once, you're out of the club. Go be a conservative we don't want you. When someone at Tuta has a bad year and ends up in the wrong publicly, find another email service to try and convince people to go too. Probably worse in functionality than Tuta as you go down to smaller and worse funded efforts in this niche field of Internet activism

But people here do it here too to Mozilla because they don't like their social outreach programs and their attempts to get advertising revenue so screw Mozilla too. So because nothing but perfection is acceptable, push away people that may be adjacent/left leaning right and switch to less developed products. Switch from Firefox and attack Mozilla who do the bulk of Firefox development and use Waterfox who do a custom deployment/build. Pure display of perfection being the enemy of good here.

You want people to embrace privacy but keep whiplashing people around when the org/anyone in leadership says something wrong. Screw Signal, they're not perfect. Screw Matrix/Element, some developer said something one day so it's all bad. I'm surprised anyone here uses any privacy software or a major open source software like Linux or Krita or Blender at the risk that someone in the background may be wrong in someway which I am 100% certain they exist in important positions. Same with Lemmy

Go back to the 60s and you all would be shitting on Fred Hampton for accepting the impure and the color coalition for everyone that had ever said something wrong. Al Franken definitely would not make it with y'all. Y'all can't build up leftist communities because y'all are bitter assholes that can't move on and spend so much time purity testing. Y'all are probably mediocre too so can't make a difference in privacy and data ownership activism anyways so should be lining up to support not just Tuta, someone hasn't screwed up publicly yet, and Proton

Reminds me of Aung San Suu Kyi. She was under the gun of the military ruling class that permitted limited democratic government and because she didn't make speech as if she lived in the US, a bunch of Americans turned on her and celebrated when the military dictatorship came back to rule and put her in prison the moment it seemed like the civilian government would actually assert more power

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (12 children)

It's not a purity test so much as a fear that publicly signaling loyalty to trump devalued their trustworthiness as private and secure. If their CEO legitimately believes that Republicans are better on tech policy than democrats because conservatives want to weaponize the federal government to control speech online, then I don't really trust him not to cooperate with federal authorities when they want to access someone's emails or vpn traffic. Conservatives are simply not trustworthy to me

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] suicidaleggroll@lemm.ee 87 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

If they can charge 30% less without Apple's fees, then why are their prices the same whether you buy on their iOS app or direct on their website? Why have they been overcharging users who don't buy through the iOS app by 30% all this time?

[–] Scipitie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 110 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Old knowledge disclaimer, but if they didn't change it then:

Because Apple literally tells people that they're not allowed to charge less somewhere else - at least that was the case several years ago...

[–] patrick@lemmy.bestiver.se 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Some things do charge different amounts though. YouTube Premium for example is more expensive if you subscribe in iOS but maybe that’s just because it’s Google.

They also could have just not let anyone subscribe through the iOS app. Lots of things do that.

[–] errer@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’ve noticed this too, there’s no consistency. Some companies seem to get away with two prices, others not.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is the same on most platforms. You'll rarely find a product for different prices in different places because if they're listed on Amazon, Steam, Apple, Google, etc. they're not allowed to.

[–] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

That isn't exactly true with Steam. Valve does allow a dev to offer a discount at a different store as long as that same discount comes to Steam in a reasonable amount of time.

Straight from the docs:"It's OK to run a discount for Steam Keys on different stores at different times as long as you plan to give a comparable offer to Steam customers within a reasonable amount of time."

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

Because Apple prohibited that.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Likely they were not allowed to by the terms they agreed to with apple.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] compostgoblin@slrpnk.net 72 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Cool! Still not gonna put all my eggs in the fascist-sympathetic basket

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ABetterTomorrow@lemm.ee 65 points 2 months ago (1 children)

“Up to”…… here’s 5% off

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 30 points 2 months ago

Very true. I'm giving you up to* 1000 upvotes.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 45 points 2 months ago (11 children)

I am sad because of all the people in this thread who think the CEO is "fascist-sympathetic" because he said Trump did something better than the Democrats one time.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, having only just switched from GMail to Proton last week my heart sank when I saw “Proton are MAGA”.

Then I spent three minutes reading up on it and it’s like, the CEO said one thing about policy on regulation of big tech that was critical of the Democrats for not doing enough, and the internet has decided that means he’s MAGA.

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

He said Republicans are better on tech policy than democrats. Republicans tech policy is motivated entirely by the fact that their racist and conspiratorial views were getting them banned on social media sites from 2015 - 2024

Conservatives have absolutely zero principles. If they say they want to break up big tech, it's because they want to control it in some way. They want the platforms to promote speech that's beneficial to them.

If you believe that Republicans truly are better for tech policy than democrats, then you either whole-heartedly agree that a group of criminals and wannabe dictators should be able to destroy any business that publishes speech against them, or you are extremely gullible. Either way, why would I want to give you my business?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

No doubt Proton’s CEO will use this to justify his “Trump is better for regulating big tech” claim, while ignoring that the judge is an Obama appointee.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Inb4 Trump invents tariffs on foreign coded software

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dutchkimble@lemy.lol 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But I already use proton and purchased outside the Apple Store (on the proton website) and use it on my iPhone? What changed?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

This the trump-licker? Yeah, bye Proton.

Buh bye now

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's not exactly 30%. For sales below $1M, it's 15%: https://developer.apple.com/app-store/small-business-program/

In Europe, where this was established last year, they started charging a Core Technology Fee to cover the cost of hosting and data transfer: https://developer.apple.com/support/core-technology-fee/

And if you switch payment providers, you have to pay at least 2.5% plus transaction and any intermediary fees.

It's nice that Proton is offering a discount, but for everyone else there may be additional ongoing costs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 19 points 2 months ago

It's time to end monopolies

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Should have done a valve and allowed selling anywhere but require price parity. Now from their greed there will be financial incentive for people to use another platform.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›