this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
710 points (97.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

34151 readers
924 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Everything that makes advertisers happy is to the detriment of humanity as a whole. Everything that makes advertisers' jobs easier also makes it easier for authoritarian governments. "Innovation" is no longer about creating new things, it's about taking what already works, breaking it, shoving ads on it and charging a ransom in the form of a premium subscription.

On the other hand, there are endless ad-skipping tools, pages and sites where the main attraction is the lack of ads without a subscription. More and more people are talking about how intrusive and annoying ads are, even those who make their living from them. As the efforts of big tech to please advertisers grow, so do the efforts of ordinary people to screw them.

Very Cyberpunk.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 7 points 5 hours ago

On the one hand, yes. But also, it's mostly capitalism.

I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with "I'm starting a frisbee club for fun. We're going to meet saturdays in the park. I'm going to put up some flyers and tell my friends about it".

But at some point that can mutate into "i put a 30 second unskippable ad for FrisbeeFranchise on youtube, and a giant billboard over the subway stop that implies if you don't play frisbee you'll never be happy". That's bad.

I think targeted ads should be illegal as a first step. I don't think anyone except the worst sort of advertisers would go to bat for those. Old fashioned static ads where they put an ad for bike stuff by the bike lane in town is annoying, but somehow we've invented things so much worse than that.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 6 hours ago

LOL no, the advertisers won that war decades ago. It's been an occupation ever since.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world 9 points 6 hours ago

Say it with me:

"Its Capitalism"

The profit motive is killingbus and the planet.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 5 points 6 hours ago

Advertising is the reason why privacy is nonexistent now... it is kinda incredible just how much information they gather.

In centuries past when people were writing constitutions and what rights people have they had privacy and warrants and spying and all that shit done based on what evil governments can do to their citizens. I don't think a single one of them ever realized just how fucking massive corporations would be and how much shit they steal from us.

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 3 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

The wildest part is that advertising has become so poisonous that now over 50% of a Americans use adblockers and over 1/3 of people world wide. It's not just techies installing adblockers for their grandmas, it's become mass market!

[–] BeatTakeshi@lemmy.world 10 points 8 hours ago

I think you mean Capitalism

[–] QueenFern@lemmy.world 4 points 7 hours ago

What Bill Hicks said

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

i don't know what happened to us as a society... we seem to have lost all semblance of media literacy.

it feels like in the 90's we were all very ad-aware, and actively opposed the idea of 'selling out'... then the rolling stones sold the rights to Start Me Up to windows and we've been in a race to the bottom ever since. why are we talking about 'monetizing your hobbies'.

what happened to shows like Media Television, magazines like AdBusters? does nobody remember reading Naomi Klein's 'No Logo'??

edit: Remember when Adam Curtis made 'A Century of the Self?

[–] KelvarIW@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 6 hours ago

Oh god the "side hustle" hobby culture gets me fuming mad.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 34 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

People are taking the piss out of you everyday. They butt into your life, take a cheap shot at you and then disappear. They leer at you from tall buildings and make you feel small. They make flippant comments from buses that imply you’re not sexy enough and that all the fun is happening somewhere else. They are on TV making your girlfriend feel inadequate. They have access to the most sophisticated technology the world has ever seen and they bully you with it. They are The Advertisers and they are laughing at you.

You, however, are forbidden to touch them. Trademarks, intellectual property rights and copyright law mean advertisers can say what they like wherever they like with total impunity.

Fuck that. Any advert in a public space that gives you no choice whether you see it or not is yours. It’s yours to take, re-arrange and re-use. You can do whatever you like with it. Asking for permission is like asking to keep a rock someone just threw at your head.

You owe the companies nothing. Less than nothing, you especially don’t owe them any courtesy. They owe you. They have re-arranged the world to put themselves in front of you. They never asked for your permission, don’t even start asking for theirs.

– Banksy

[–] avattar@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

It's that...the reason we are so dissatisfied with our lives? We may not even pay attention to most adverts, but subconsciously, they affect us and make us fell unhappy?

[–] zebidiah@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

yep, it's a psychological attack (on your subconscious) to create unrealistic expectations and feelings of inadequacy among consumers who do not experience the same outcomes.

whether you pay attention to it or not, it's still a psychic attack

[–] avattar@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I think that is literally, objectively evil. How can we fight back? I already use adblocks online, that is one way, I think.

[–] witten@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

Stop giving your money to the giant companies that fund and perpetuate surveillance ad tech. Shop local.

[–] Guns0rWeD13@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

hi. you must be new here. welcome to capitalism, consumerism, and the modern dystopia. what will you be doing to destroy it?

[–] LarmyOfLone@lemm.ee 7 points 16 hours ago

I feel the same. Besides what you mentioned, there is also the effect on what news and content will be produced and shown (see Manufacturing Consent). The advertisers who are the customers of shows want the viewers in a buying mood. So while "if it bleeds it leads" works fine but controversial topics that disturbs people or make them think will not be shown.

Best example is youtube - once the demonetization came there must have been significant effects on what topics were discussed and how. Without sponsorings and patreon it would be worse, but this or rule is shaping our global civilization for the worse.

People pay far too much attention to ideology, but it's the rules of a system that lead it to converge to different outcomes. And advertising is a big one.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 23 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Advertising exists to manipulate behavior beneficial to clients, out of target groups. It is propaganda and psychological manipulation. The days of simply informing people of products and services is a fairy tale. Maddison Avenue was built off of Nazi Germany's mass media propaganda strategies.

[–] Shady_Shiroe@lemmy.world 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I loved those old Chevrolet commercials from the 1930s that explained things like how a differential or transmission works in a car and I'm not even a car guy

[–] Jarix@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

I only remember the one, but yeah that was an absolute gem

[–] OccamsRazer@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Advertising, marketing, and the stock market are the worst aspects of capitalism, and the system could be improved dramatically with heavy restrictions on all of those. Yeah it would shrink the economy, but the new steady state would be much better. Less waste, better stuff.

[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

The economy doesn't represent the people, doesn't feed anyone and doesn't reflect their well being.

You have my vote.

[–] Skellysgirl@lemm.ee 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If I had a magic internet/media button I know what it would be.

It would be a brand banish button. If I see an ad, I wanna just have a button to banish them from all my devices…forever. I already have a rule you poss me off with adverts …I defo won’t buy.

So much tech potential that just does not exist!

[–] SynopsisTantilize@lemm.ee 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

YouTube ads were only ever advertising to me on what not to entertain purchasing.

[–] Sarmyth@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

I agree. Everything being advertised on YouTube is sketch. Same with all the repeated podcast adverts honestly.

The fact that youtube hits me with an ad for a game that says everyone thinks its fake, with the most bullshit sounding voice over, tells me they are happy to take money for obvious scam products.

[–] Dragonstaff@leminal.space 24 points 1 day ago

Yes, but you misspelled "capitalism".

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They're building the internet for AI now, and were building it for advertisers for years before that, what with SEO choking up search results.

What should have been a wonderfully expressive, collaborative, and unifying medium is just being completely ravaged.

I, unfortunately, work in web development.

[–] SeboBear@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Ay they even do Seo for LLM now where their product is recommended more likely by an llm

[–] rayquetzalcoatl@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Haha yeah that's what I mean; the marketers at work are constantly blathering on about how we need to develop for ChatGPT and it's just like... Fuck off 😂

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 46 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (8 children)

With modern advertising techniques, adverts mainly work by psychological manipulation - putting a name in your mind, making you associate it with an emotion (for example cars are "freedom", perfume is "lust"), induce fear of a non-existing problem and then sell you a "solution" and so on.

It's like being the focus of a crowd of untiring salesmen who are slick manipulators with training in Psychology and with no ethics at all.

That's how it is every day in every place (even the comfort of your own home) in the advert heavy world we live in if one doesn't fight to keep that shit away.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] flop_leash_973@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Advertising as a concept is not bad. But given the realities of capitalism, the greedy executive and shareholders can never resist the easy money. As a result anything that implements ads will eventually be completely overrun and ruined by them. Might take a year, might take 10, but once that door is opened it is inevitable.

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 1 points 19 hours ago

As a service meant to inform people of things they could benefit from, I see it. Like, we have public service announcements about food banks, giveaway days, and fun events. Honestly, if it was done for something other than profit, I'm not even sure the term "advertising" really applies - at least not how we usually use it.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 10 points 1 day ago

Very Cyberpunk.

Just another battle ground of the class war that has been waged since ruling class figured out they can dunk on pedons

[–] utopiah@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

At least you are an adult so you have the tools, cognitive and cultural, helping you see the problem. Imagine a very young kid, say 5 years old, watching exciting video content. They do not yet possess such ways to protect themselves from for-profit manipulation.

Just few days ago I finished the IMHO excellent "Buy The Mouse that Roared: Disney and the End of Innocence" by Henry A Giroux and Grace Pollock so you can already understand where I'm going with this.

Yes, advertisers are terrible, they make money by manipulating our thoughts, probing our deepest desire, toying with our emotions in order to sell us whatever is made by whomever pay them the most. But... you and I are fully formed human beings in the sense that we are adults. We spend years navigating through the world, getting scamming, learning how to spot lies and marketing pitches. The problem is, as showcased by Disney in that example (a very important example!), the process is not random. It is a very thoughtful and strategical one, namely how to transform a human being to a consumer from the youngest age.

Anyway I won't dig into the obvious but the book ends with a couple of practical links e.g. commercial free childhood (what a name, how can how even imagine that would be needed?) which since then became https://fairplayforkids.org/

If you prefer a video on the topic the 2001 yes still relevant 2001 documentary (52 min) "Mickey Mouse Monopoly - Disney, Childhood & Corporate Power" https://films.mediaed.org/Film/Mickey_Mouse_Monopoly/f56fd530-8724-460b-b2bc-6eba9868f0e7

I personally pulled that thread also thanks to the more recent 2016 article "Teaching Disney Critically in the Age of Perpetual Consumption" https://www.jstor.org/stable/45157190 but, again, the point is that it's systemic.

load more comments
view more: next ›