this post was submitted on 08 May 2025
629 points (98.8% liked)

196

3152 readers
1648 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 30 points 19 hours ago

The other lesson is that no matter how far you walk in life, it’s just the same background looped over and over again.

Liars ARE monsters. Maybe not like literally, but they are monsters nonetheless.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 87 points 1 day ago (5 children)

And then they undermined that message that one time they made the zombies real, and probably a couple other times I don't remember.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Most of the followups have treated the supernatural as real. It's never that way in the original.

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

But even then, the twist was that even if the monster is real, the bad guys were still mundane crooks.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 5 points 14 hours ago

Scooby Doo on Zombie Island prominently features adults who lie to children.

[–] Lesrid@lemm.ee 42 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Every movie essentially involves the supernatural to some extent.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 22 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

To be fair it started with the Scrappy Doo series. A lot of those villains were real.

[–] Lesrid@lemm.ee 12 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Explains why the first live action movie features him so prominently

[–] dalekcaan@lemm.ee 8 points 21 hours ago

That and to cash in on everyone hating his guts

[–] Killer57@lemmy.ca 16 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Don't get me started on Kiss being aliens with transformation sequences.

[–] kboy101222@sh.itjust.works 16 points 20 hours ago

I mean, that's just Kiss lore. I'm not kidding, there's KISS lore

[–] Maultasche@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Also in the show that is pictured here

[–] _lilith@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago

You gotta know the movie rule tho. If it's a movie, animated or not the monster is real

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 57 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Wow, Scooby Doo must be "woke" or whatever the kids say these days

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 44 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Everything you liked as a kid seems woke and politicized when you were a tiny kid because tiny kids are too dumb to think on purpose.

I'll say, though, I was old enough to be mad at the James Gunn-written Scooby adaptations because they couldn't resist doing actual supernatural stuff and lost this angle entirely.

And then those got reappraised as not being garbage when THOSE kids grew up and a lot of the newer stuff went with that angle as well.

You being too dumb to think on purpose doesn't mean you're not learning, for better and worse. I used to think that wasn't the case when I was a kid because I was too dumb.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 9 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That one's okay because it taught me to respect people with unusual spiritual beliefs.

[–] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ironically I got the opposite, it makes sense in worlds where magic is actually real, not in our reality though.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 2 points 12 hours ago

But Thorn isn't actually a witch. She can't do spells. She does the rituals for her own mental health, she doesn't expect any magic to come out of them.

[–] HEXN3T@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

....the "kids" in question being Republicans.

It's fine, I also respond like this.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Well, you'd be surprised. Going through uni I definitely got to see a lot of left-of-centre young adults get through semiotics and discouse analysis courses and have an absolute fit at the realization that a bunch of the cool stuff they liked as kids had a clear right-wing bent.

I mean, they all had a lot of time to get attached to Back to the Future and Die Hard before they were forced to think about it too hard. Learning! Twice!

[–] lakemalcom10@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Interested in hearing about the right wing bent of Bttf and die hard

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I would lie if I said I wasn't baiting a little bit, but man, see? Cuts both ways.

Die Hard is extremely obvious. I mean, the whole movie is about this guy finding that his wife suddenly has a job, makes more money than he does and may be attractive to smarter, richer people, but then fate conspires to make his blue collar streetsmarts and prepper attitudes having him save the day for the foppish yuppies. The entire movie ends when they throw the eurotrash rich thief out of a building by literally unshackling Holly from the bonus gift her company job gave her, then wrapping her up in a comfort blanket and taking her home. The movie also finds time to clearly establish that all public servants are idiots except for street level cops.

Back to the Future is subtler, but also pretty straightforward. Kid thinks life with middle class parents in the 80s sucks, goes back to the 50s, which turn out to be as ideal as expected but also somehow cooler in a very 80s kind of way, teaches his dad self-assertion and comes back to the future to find he's now upper class and has a 4x4. It's a lot less hardcore, but the reagonomics are running underneath the whole thing. I'd take that it's accidental, because the same team went much more leftward in Roger Rabbit, so I think it's just that a lot of the cultural white noise of the mid-80s is baked into the assumptions. And the nostalgia is a massive driving force of conservatism anyway. BTTF is idolizing this "fifteighties" imagery the same way Grease was to suggest there is a perfect past to return to. Kind of in the way Stranger Things and a bunch of other stuff does to the 80s.

That's maybe the most fun part of breaking down BTTF. The iconic slivers of the film set in the 80s are supposed to show it being run down, realistic and disappointingly drab by comparison.

Also, Lybian terrorists stealing plutonium but being so incompetent they get tricked by Doc and defeated by Marty. That's a very time-specific one, like Rambo praising the Taliban.

[–] MalikMuaddibSoong@startrek.website 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Dare I ask you to go further?

What’s an extreme example of a crypto-rightwing-coded-80s-flick?

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 9 points 23 hours ago (13 children)

I don't know, man, Die Hard is pretty far out there.

The Rambo and Rocky sequels are what they are as well. They are almost naive about it in a way that supports ironic appreciation, though.

Dirty Harry tracks, but that's back in the early 70s. I never went deep enough into the sequels to see if it got really bad down the line.

I've heard some stuff about Field of Dreams, but I don't think I've watched that in one sitting.

I don't know it's often the action stuff. Your Commandos and Death Wishes and so on. Does stuff like Red Dawn and Invasion USA even count as "crypto"? Those are pretty overt.

If you let me break the time frame I will say that I think The Incredibles flies over people's heads as being aggressively conservative. Forrest Gump used to, but I think people got wise to it over time. Another Zemeckis joint, too. Maybe it's Roger Rabbit that was the accident.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

The Incredibles flies over people's heads as being aggressively conservative.

Superheroes are a metaphor for minorities. There's the immigrant experience in constantly moving house, the queer experience in hiding who you are, the neurodivergent experience in being told not to stick out in school.

The villain is a capitalist billionaire who wants to appropriate a minority's culture without understanding what it means. If you're an indigenous minority you've been through that.

There's a scene where the mum has a talk with her kids about treating authority figures they've been trained not to fear as threats to their lives. That talk is familiar to any black family in the USA.

There's a struggle between parents and their children about how to navigate assimilating into the majority culture while retaining their own identity. Many immigrants go through what Dash and Violet did.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 2 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

That's not an invalid read. My problem with it is that the movie doesn't show the supes as being inherently feared or hated. This isn't the X-Men, which does work on that front.

Here the supes are suppressed by the government, not a societal issue. They are presented as being accepted in the past, in a world without intervention. Thriving, in fact. They are celebrities and have a whole James Bond-style support system. They didn't come from a different place with a different culture like Superman or Wonder Woman. Superheroes-as-minorities is a very frequent trope, but The Incredibles isn't rehashing any of those, they're doing the Fantastic 4. Superheroes-as-family. Bit of a different tack.

And when they're suppressed they aren't suppresed into a marginal role in society. They are suppressed into suburban white middle class. Which, incidentally, is presented as less flashy than the life of the one explicitly black character, but that is probably a well-meaning accident.

I do think the concept of cultural appropriation is and has alway been iffy, but beyond that, while I think you can argue that read I don't think it fits the movie particularly well.

And yes, in the moral space the movie is drawing it is explicitly including those characteristics as part of the exceptionality you are supposed to self-realize. As I told you on the other thread, I don't think Bird has a Randian "you should be an asshole if you want to" approach to this. He sees it as moral and ethical and valuable for society when people can self express their exceptional, natural abilities, and I do believe there is an explicit attempt to include those things in the mix. It's why the slightly token black guy is there in the first place.

I should say I also think it's undermined because the one instance of someone even appearing to have a recognizable trait of those things in the main family, which would be Vi's crippling social anxiety, is shown as getting better when she fully expresses her powers and self-realizes, which if a bit of an icky approach.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago

Here the supes are suppressed by the government, not a societal issue. They are presented as being accepted in the past, in a world without intervention

Not true. The government shut down the superhero program because of public pressure. The catalyst was the suicide jumper that Bob saved. But around that time there were a lot of incidents of property damage and lawsuits that made it too expensive for the government to have superheroes, because of what the people were doing.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Bob is marginalised in a way invisible to the people around him, but it's there. As a plus size person, he doesn't fit in his cubicle or his car. When he stops paying attention, the world around him crumbles. World of cardboard. Being huge and super strong isn't easy for him.

But what's even harder is having Bob's justice sensitivity. Justice sensitivity is a symptom of autism in which neurodivergent people are more sensitive to social problems. Bob gets fired because his sense of right and wrong is too strong to fit into the world around him.

Dash also struggles with the same problems as neurodivergent people. Dash's allegory is ADHD. He's not allowed to participate in the parts of school life that interest him; that he's good at. He's constantly holding himself back. I was a gifted kid too, and my giftedness has caused consequences for other students when I dominated a classroom discussion. When I was moved to a gifted school and surrounded by peers, life got better for me. I see myself in Dash.

Violet's marginalisation is more of an immigrant/racialised/misogyny problem. She's accepted the mainstream narrative that her powers make her a freak. That she's different and that's bad. That normality is an ideal to aspire to. She becomes confident in herself after she's allowed to engage with her own native culture and see that it's not bad. She gets a talk from Mum and forges a new relationship with her minority identity. The fighting is secondary. The story isn't about it.

There are queer or disabled people in white middle class nuclear families, and they have problems. I think Brad chose to make the story relatable to everyone by using a cultural image we're very familiar with. But then he showed problems that happen when someone, even someone in that social role, is different from what society expects.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, now you're stretching. Bob isn't "plus size" he's meant to look like a bodybuilder who let himself go (and gets back into shape once the societal restraints on his self-actualization are removed). The scenes where his environment is shown to be too small for his stature are a visual representation of "normal" life holding him back from his natural greatness, not a rendition of the struggles of plus sized people.

I mean, Dash and ADHD works more, but it has the same problem as Vi's anxiety in that he gets better by being himself and doing what he was meant to do and "being the best he can be", which is what he complains his mom is not letting him do. If you want to read the kids' powers as mental health issues actualized then I can't be on board with how the denouement's return to a modified normalcy presents their new situation. They didn't work to get adjusted, they didn't need help or therapy or support, just to be set free to self-actualize.

I don't think that's the idea, beyond the superficial (the kids' mental health is played as growing pains or inherent characteristics of childhood, if anything), but if it was it'd be more problematic than the alternative.

I also take issue with the idea that white suburban middle class is "a cultural image we're familiar with" and so suitable to serve as a projection of a minority alegory. I mean, no, white suburban middle class isn't default human. If you set out to make an allegory about middle class you don't come at it from that premise, that'd be... bad. Again, I think the objectivist read is actually less problematic there.

On that it again helps to look at similar media that DOES use superpowers as a minority allegory. Yeah, the X-Men work as a metaphor for that, and you do see it transposed to white middle class. X2's "Have you tried NOT being a mutant" scene comes to mind. But they are also presented on the run from authorities, living in the sewers, looking visibly different to non-mutants and being shunned on sight and in all sorts of other situations analogous to real world discrimination. The Incredibles does very much not. Suburban middle class life is stiffling in that very 90s way where it's fine but it's not the self-realization that special people like the Parrs were meant for, so it makes the men in particular feel restless and frustrated.

The Incredibles is a bit of an anti-Fight Club, now that I think of it. Which is weird to think about, but it fits. Both get interpreted backwards often, too.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

You know what does more for a trans person's mental health and suicide risk than any amount of talk therapy? Being themself.

Besides that, it's a movie. There isn't any time for a therapy scene in a 115 minute family movie about superheroes with everything else going on. The core theme of the movie is family, and family is what helps Dash and Violet. Helen accepts them for who they are instead of telling them to repress, and Bob gets on Helen's side and encourages restraint. That's actually kind of accurate - children's mental health issues are so often caused by a bad family environment. Bob and Helen weren't on the same page for most of the movie, and they were giving their kids conflicted messaging. When they reconcile and agree on how to parent the kids, the kids are able to reconcile too. Dash stops parroting Dad's supremacist views and Violet stops internalising Mum's conformist views. Good parenting is the very best thing for a child's development.

And when I say plus size, I don't mean fat. Plus size men's clothing stores are called "big and tall". Mr Incredible is big, and he's tall. His size is plus compared to the body type the world is built for. It's giving him back problems and poor activity levels because he doesn't fit.

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 2 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, but that's not what you said Dash stands in for. Being yourself is not how you treat ADHD.

The solution to not having enough time to cover that is to not make Dash stand-in for that. Which they don't because that's not what the movie is about.

The movie is about a stiffling system making the kids of a white middle class nuclear family struggle by forcing them to conform to a rigid (government-set) standard when they would thrive by self-expression and learning from their parents' experience instead. Which neatly solves the problem of having to find a stand-in for mental health tratment by making the kids' issues in the fictional universe be caused by the conformity, not by their superpowers.

Because the movie isn't interested in the downsides of the powers. Dash getting bored because he's fast isn't presented as a struggle when he's not forced to stay on the level of the normies. It's not a day-to-day problem in the way The Thing being a monster made of rocks is a problem for him. It's not caused by his powers, it's caused by society trying to hold him back. Dash isn't trans and he doesn't have ADHD, he is a precocious kid being dragged back because the system is meant for people with less talent than he has.

That is what the movie is concerned with, and it overlaps with the ideology that it does. You are projecting what is at most a secondary concern (the feelings of otherness and isolation) onto the text because they are a more palatable interpretation.

Which, hey, is the point of this entire thread.

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Don't forget any movie that includes a fleet of Chevrolet Suburbans being driven as a government vehicle!

[–] MudMan@fedia.io 4 points 19 hours ago

Oh, man, way too new for the conversation.

But I guess we can add Bad Boys 2 to the list. I mean, all of Michael Bay's oeuvre, but holy crap, Bad Boys 2. That MUST have been some form of weird Florida-lobby/CIA psyop, there is no other explanation.

Ahh Deathwish I haven’t thought about that in years but yeah it does have white flight, brown gangs, and one NYC architect-cum-vigilante savior.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] egrets@lemmy.world 13 points 20 hours ago

Life is full of mysteries, yeah
But there are answers out there
And they won't be found
By people sitting around
Looking serious
And saying 'Isn't life mysterious?'
Let's sit here and hope
Let's call up the fucking Pope
Let's go watch Oprah
Interview Deepak Chopra

If you wanna watch telly, you should watch Scooby Doo
That show was so cool
Because every time there was a church with a ghoul
Or a ghost in a school
They looked beneath the mask and what was inside?
The fucking janitor or the dude who ran the waterslide
Because throughout history
Every mystery
Ever solved
Has turned out to be
Not magic

- Tim Minchin, Storm

[–] gabbath@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

The bad guys in every episode aren't monsters, they're liars.

In reality, they're both.

load more comments
view more: next ›